Randy Seaver (RS) When will you drop the Old Search capability in Ancestry.com?
RS: What happened to the Article Archive on the Learning Center? Will it disappear?
RS: Why doesn't the Search field on the Learning Center work better?
RS: Will the source citations created by attaching an historical record to a Member Tree ever comply with Chicago Manual Of Style or Evidence Explained style standards?
RS: Which states will be indexed first in the 1940 U.S. Census?
RS: Why don't you include Fold3.com matches in Ancestry.com search results? And vice versa? Especially the FREE collections.
RS: Why do you charge customers every year for a Family Tree Maker upgrade which has marginal changes from the previous version?
RS: Are you working with the BetterGEDCOM group or the GEDCOM X group on GEDCOM-like standards? Will you adopt a GEDCOM standard and implement it on your websites and in Family Tree Maker?
RS: * Are there any historical record collections on Genealogy.com that are not on Ancestry.com? If so, what are they?
RS: Is www.Mundia.com still a beta website under development? What are the plans for Mundia?
letzelfarm asked in Comments: Does Ancestry plan to allow its members to merge separate trees that are posted?
Lastly, I wish they had a check mark box or some other way of marking a record that I've already reviewed. You know, maybe offer a red X for those that are not what you're looking for (negative searches), or a green for positive searches. Then when they continue to show up in my future searches, I won't waste my time revisiting the same darn records over and over!