tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26204193.post4010058193176233305..comments2024-03-26T11:22:41.940-07:00Comments on Genea-Musings: More on Sourcing Names and RelationshipsRandy Seaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17477703429102065294noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26204193.post-74606489893247000772012-08-28T12:37:05.529-07:002012-08-28T12:37:05.529-07:00Since I was slow to read your original post about ...Since I was slow to read your original post about sourcing names and relationships, I'll comment here instead. Names - yes, definitely source those. Regarding sourcing parent-child relationships, as a Family Tree Maker user I can say that this is one of my single biggest bugaboos with the program. Even FTM 2012 provides no straightforward means of sourcing a parent-child relationship. If Ancestry.com "fixes" anything in the recently announced extended product lifecycle of FTM 2012, adding the ability to source parent-child relationships would be the most important one in my book. And having the ability to create non-familial relationships (neighbors, shipmates, etc.) would be the next biggest to me. But I suspect the underlying database structure is probably not designed for either of these changes to be made easily.Aylarjahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07440947193830946558noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26204193.post-53359129330663165402012-08-28T12:35:12.213-07:002012-08-28T12:35:12.213-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Aylarjahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07440947193830946558noreply@blogger.com