tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26204193.post7865470435441083755..comments2024-03-26T11:22:41.940-07:00Comments on Genea-Musings: Importing a FamilySearch Family Tree Source Into RootsMagicRandy Seaverhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17477703429102065294noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26204193.post-2566763861135180782016-06-29T08:26:20.087-07:002016-06-29T08:26:20.087-07:00Randy, you usefully point up the faulty and non-st...Randy, you usefully point up the faulty and non-standard source-citation structure in FamilySearch and the Family Tree. There is no provision for Master Source or repository, and often the FS citation omits specific data for citations (such as volume and page numbers for records).<br /><br />Thus there will be lack of real integration of source citations between FS-FT and genealogy software that does have a standard citation structure.<br /><br />This is just one of the limitations of some web-hosted trees.<br />Geoloverhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12050268303916428230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26204193.post-32749567924307142252016-06-29T03:36:58.817-07:002016-06-29T03:36:58.817-07:00Hi Randy, I have the same problem here, and create...Hi Randy, I have the same problem here, and create my own citations, just like you. And I really hope that some time, maybe with the help of FHISO, FamilySearch and software authors like RootsMagic can agree on a format where for instance the collection title becomes the master source title, or simply the source title, as we call it in Gramps, and references to the person, page number, whatever is there, are sent to source details, of citation fields in Gramps.Enno Borgsteedehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15212823867293147091noreply@blogger.com