Thursday, February 27, 2014

Treasure Chest Thursday - Post 203: 1862 Burial Record for Rebecca Rich in Hilperton, Wiltshire

It's Treasure Chest Thursday - time to look in my digital image files to see what treasures I can find for my family history and genealogy musings.

The treasure today is the Burial Record for Rebecca Rich in Hilperton, Wiltshire in 1862:



The information for Rebecca Rich's burial is (handwritten information in italics):

Heading:  BURIALS in the Parish of      Hilperton     
in the County of      Wilts     
in the Year One Thousand, Eight Hundred and    sixty two    .

No.:  42
Name:  Rebecca Rich
Abode:  Hilperton
When Buried:  March 7 [1862]
Age:  78
By Whom:  J.H. Tait, Rector

The source citation for this burial entry is:

Church of England, Parish Church of Hilperton (Wiltshire, England), Bishop's Transcripts, 1622-1880, "Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1837-1880," FHL BRITISH Microfilm 1,279,404, Item 15 (accessed 5 February 2014); Burials, Page [ ] (blank), 1862, No. 42, Rebecca Rich entry.

The information in this burial entry is very limited, but the age of 78 tells me that this is my 3rd great-grandmother, who was born in about 1784.  On the other hand, the burial date is much more definitive than the entry in the Civil Registration records which just indicate the first quarter of 1862.  I have not ordered the Civil Registration death record to date.

I obtained this image from the Hilperton, Wiltshire Bishops Transcripts on microfilm at the Family History Library on 5 February 2014.  


Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Dear Randy: Check Out This Town Clerk's Lament

I received an email from reader Karen recently, who forwarded a digital image from one of the FamilySearch record collections that she thought was interesting.  Here is what Karen told me:

"While researching the death of my 5th gr-grandfather Charles West who died in Southbridge, Massachusetts in 1842, I came across a commentary (you might even call it a "rant") by the Town Clerk at the bottom of the register page.  I know from your blog that you do a lot of research in Massachusetts, so I thought you might find these comments of interest.  It appears that the prior town clerk was less than fastidious in his work and the current clerk had his work cut out for him.

The record on Family Search for Charles West's death is here: https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.2/MDPF-N9Y/p_11817296716 and I've also attached the image itself so you don't need to navigate to the page.

I guess I'll have a little more perspective the next time I'm frustrated when I cannot find a birth, marriage or death record!  (Though, to be honest, I'll be no less frustrated!)"


Here is the image from the FamilySearch "Massachusetts, Deaths, 1841-1915" collection:



The note at the bottom of the page, for the Southbridge, Massachusetts death records for the year ending May 1, 1843, says:

"Sir. I am completely discouraged and out of patience trying to make a correct return.  Last year I returned 7 Births, no pains having been taken by my predecessor to collect them.  This year I have collected 58 which cannot be far from the exact number.  At any rate I have taken great pains having been to nearly every house in Town.  I have not been able to give names in every instance - 1st Because many have left town since the date of the Birth, 2nd Because parents have not named them & are not obliged to within six months.  In some I could only ascertain that there had been a birth whether male or female not known.  I have given notice calling attention to the  subject and perhaps & returned to me as the law requires.  Does not the law which requires me to send a "copy of my Record" also require you to furnish Blanks?  If I remain in office another year I shall in open Town Meeting give notice of such laws as may be existing at the time, & that they will be enforced without regard to standing or other circumstance (however inconvenient they may be & I may so that they cannot be more so).  

"I return the Marriages which have taken place in this town which you will see falls short of my "Copy of Records" - Individuals in Town go out to be Married nearly 1/3 go out of the State into Connecticut where the laws of our State have nothing to do with them.  Nothing like accuracy can be obtained from the border Towns while the laws permit this, as by going 6 miles from this Office a Couple may be married & no person in Town know for months, if at all that the ceremony had taken place, & if known nothing can be done  to assist correctness in Statistics.
                                                                       Respectfully &c  W.S. Knowlton"

There are several lessons here for genealogists searching in all localities:

*  Not every town clerk recorded every birth, marriage or death in their locality

*  Some town clerks were not as diligent as Mr. Knowlton to visit every household in town.

*  Not every child was immediately given a name after birth.

*  Some families moved before the town clerk could visit them

*  Some events took place in neighboring towns or states.

Obviously, all researchers need to understand that these types of problems are endemic to every kind of vital record recorded by a government official.  Granted, this was 1843, only two years after the State of Massachusetts required towns to record births, marriages and deaths and forward a copy of their town records to the State. Compliance was not perfect and town/county clerks may not have been diligent enough to record every vital event.  On the other hand, Massachusetts town clerks had been recording births, marriages and deaths in their town record books for over 200 years by 1843, so this should have been a routine activity by now, unless a town clerk had serious physical or mental problems.

When I read information like the above, I realize how fortunate we are to have any records for our ancestors birth, marriage or death at all.

Thank you to Karen for the excellent "catch" at the bottom of the page in this record collection, and for sharing it with me, and agreeing to let me publish it.

If you find funny or quirky things in record collections, and want to pass them along, I will be happy to publish them along with your, or my, pithy comments.


Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver


Indexing Obituary Collections Using FamilySearch Indexing

FamilySearch made a big announcement at RootsTech 2014 that they were starting an Obituary Indexing project - see a blog article at Obituaries + Volunteers = A Treasure Trove of Searchable Stories, posted 7 February 2014.  One of the recurring themes at RootsTech was that "Dead Men Don't Tell Stories ... But Their Obituaries Do!"  FamilySearch also declared that 2014 was the "Year of the Obituaries" on 16 January 2014.

The first blog article highlights an Indexing Obituaries video that helps potential indexers understand the indexing process.  There is also a link to a PDF presentation for Indexing Obituaries and Death Notices.


I wrote Which Obituary Collections Are In FamilySearch Indexing? (posted 21 February 2014) and indexed a few batches last week.

This post will describe some of my experiences in indexing batches in this collection:

1)  First, I had to download the updated FamilySearch Indexing program and install it on my computer (I think a new version is being released soon).


2)  That was easy to do, and I opened the program, logged into FamilySearch, and tried to figure out what to do next.  The Dashboard looks like this:


I checked the instructions again (I recommend reading them carefully!) and decided that I needed to Download a Batch (the button is in the upper left-hand corner of the screen above right under the "My Work" title).

3)  That gave me a list of available projects to work on:



There were only two "Obituaries" projects - one for "Idaho -- Obituaries, 1880-2013 (Part B) and one for "Obituaries of German Immigrants, 1871-2013.  Both were labeled as "Intermediate" in difficulty level.

4)  I chose the Idaho project, and downloaded a Batch by clicking "OK":


5)  I clicked on the "Work on Batch" button on the screen above, and a helpful set of "Project Instructions" appeared in a new window:


6)  After closing that window, I now had my first batch to index.  It appears that a Batch in this collection consists of three items to index.  Here is the screen for the first item:


Over on the left, is a list of "Image Record" numbers of the form "01-01."  The first number is for the item number in the batch, and the second number is for the person number in the batch.  Each person named in the actual record gets a person number for indexing purposes.  For the person number 01-01 above, I entered the appropriate information from the prompts provided by the program.  As always, you enter only the information clearly provided by the record information.  Although the birth date and death date for the person were provided in the record, I did not enter the age because it was not explicitly given in the record.

I finished that batch of 3 record items quickly just by tabbing down the "Image Record" list on the left-hand panel.  When I was done, I clicked the "Quality Checker" button in the right-hand panel and after completing that, I clicked on the "Submit Work to the Computer and Server" icon on the menu line above the "Header Data" tab - it's the first one on the left.  It took me awhile to figure that out being a relative newbie to this process.

My other problem was figuring out how to insert <blank" into the balance of the "Image Record" items when there are no more persons to be indexed from the record.  The keystroke on Windows is Ctrl-Shift-B.  And then my dilemma was how to enter <blank> in the indexing fields for those marked "<Required>"  I tried "Ctrl-Shift-B" and it wiped out everything I had entered so I had to enter it again (but now the <blank> indicator was in the fields already.  So I guess that if you indicate <blank" before you enter any information, you'll be OK.

In order to submit the Batch and have it accepted, I had to reach 100% Complete.  On the screen above, I was at 57% complete because I had not entered <blank> in any of the blank fields.  After I did that, I was at 100% complete.

Even then, I still had not submitted the batch.  Back on the "My Work" screen (second image above), I had to click on the "Submit Batch" button and have another quality check

As you can see on the image above, the records were from a set of burial or death record cards in Idaho.  I wondered if there were actually obituaries, rather than index cards, in this project.

7)  I downloaded another batch, and this one had an actual obituary in it:



8)  If readers have suggestions for how to deal with the blank lines, I would appreciate knowing them.  I didn't see an explicit instruction about putting <blank> in the Age and other fields in the instructions - maybe I missed them.

9)  Well, that was interesting.  I either forgot how to do it since I indexed the 1940 U.s. Census in 2012, or they've changed the program.

I encourage readers to participate in this Obituary Indexing project, and any other project on the list to be indexed.  I'm going to try to do some Indexing every week.

It will be interesting to see how far the Obituary Indexing Project gets in 2014.  100 million indexed names is a pretty ambitious goal.  But if 100,000 indexers do it, that's 1,000 per indexer on average, so its doable just as the 1940 U.S. census indexing was achieved in only 5 months.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/02/indexing-obituary-collections-using.html

copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver



The Carringer House in San Diego in 1897 -- Post 296 for (Not So) Wordless Wednesday

I'm posting family photographs from my collection on Wednesdays, but they aren't Wordless Wednesday posts like others do - I am incapable of having a wordless post.

Here is a photograph of an ancestral home taken by a photographer in San Diego, California:




This house was built on the northeast corner of what is now 30th Street (running north-south) and Hawthorn Street (running east-west) in San Diego by by great-grandparents, Henry Austin and Della (Smith) Carringer.  The left-side of the house in the picture above faced west, and the right-side of the house face south.  The walkway from the porch towards the street goes to the corner of the block.

The photograph above was taken in about 1900, and includes the following people (from the left):

*  Della (Smith) Carringer (1862-1944, in white dress and hat) standing next to her son, Lyle.
*  Lyle Lawrence Carringer (1891-1976, wearing a hat) and standing next to his mother, Della.
*  David Jackson Carringer (1828-1902, in dark clothes and hat, with a white beard, looking toward the west)
*  Henry Austin Carringer (1853-1946, standing on the center walkway)
*  Rebecca (Spangler) Carringer (1832-1901, standing on the south side of the house) next to her son, Harvey.
*  Harvey Edgar Carringer (1852-1946, standing on the south side of the house) next to his mother, Rebecca.
*  Abbie (Vaux) Smith (1844-1931, standing on the south side of the house) on the far right.

I don't know the name of the family horse on the far left side of the photograph.

This Victorian gingerbread house had two bedrooms, a kitchen, a bathroom, and a parlor on the first floor There was a staircase in the center of the house up to the second story. The second story had at least four rooms - including at least two bedrooms, topped by a widow's walk with a lightning rod. There was a large front porch on the west and south sides of the house.

Della (Smith) Carringer bought the lot on the southern part of this block for $450 in 1894.  The house was built (mostly by Austin) over several years, and they resided in it from 1897 until their deaths in 1944 and 1946.  

I grew up in this house, on the second story, but that's another story that I'll tell next week.

The photograph above was pasted onto a page in an Ohio county history book, probably by my grandfather, Lyle L. Carringer, when he was a child.  It was probably taken by a professional photographer in about the 1900 time frame.  I carefully removed the pasted page and scanned it.  The image above is cropped to remove borders on the original photograph.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/02/the-carringer-house-in-san-diego-in.html

Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver


Tuesday, February 25, 2014

I'm a Social Media Maverick too! Family Tree Magazine Names 40 SMMs

I received an email today from Diane Haddad, editor of Family Tree Magazine and writer of the Genealogy Insider blog saying:

"We announced 40 Social Media Mavericks to follow in the March/April 2014 Family Tree Magazine, in Lisa Louise Cooke's article Social Media Mavericks (available online at http://familytreemagazine.com/article/40-social-media-mavericks ). Cooke recommends 40 genealogy individuals and organizations to follow on blogs, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube or Pinterest. This article recognizes the important role of social media in the way we share family history research, find inspiration and advice, connect with distant relatives, share and discover new resources, and more."




Genea-Musings was noted in the Blogging category, along with 8 others.  There were many other geneabloggers named in the Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Pinterest categories.

The article had this to say about me:

"Randy Seaver reliably serves up genealogy research tips, techniques and news, as well as commentary on his own research. And nobody does software evaluation better, so if you’re trying to choose a genealogy database or want to use the one you have more effectively, this is the blog for you."

I thought that the list should have included Google+ posters and Hangouts, and a number of active and notable genealogy bloggers/social media mavens were not included.

For example, I think that DearMYRTLE deserved to be included, perhaps on the YouTube list.  She is one of the persons very active on Google+ and Facebook, and has been doing weekly "Mondays With Myrt" Hangout On Air that are archived on YouTube.  In addition, she has done one series of "Mastering Genealogical Proof Study Group" Hangouts On Air and just started a second series.  This "Hangout On Air" medium is one of the few "active collaboration/discussion" forums available for researchers in video format that I think can be very useful for genealogical research.

I also have other social media outlets which I mainly use to highlight my blog posts and genealogy issues, including:

*  Facebook Profile:  https://www.facebook.com/Geneaholic

*  Twitter Feed:  https://twitter.com/rjseaver  or @rjseaver

*  Google+ Profile:  https://plus.google.com/u/0/+RandySeaver/posts

*  Genea-Musings blog:  www.geneamusings.com

*  Geneaholic blog:  www.geneaholic.com

*  Chula Vista Genealogy Cafe blog:  http://cvgencafe.blogspot.com

*  My Flipboard Magazines:  https://flipboard.com/profile/Geneaholic

*  My Rebel Mouse page:  https://www.rebelmouse.com/rjseaver/

Congratulations to all of the other social media mavericks that are listed - I think that I follow almost all of them already!

My thanks to Lisa Louise Cooke and Family Tree Magazine for the honor of being named a Social Media Maverick.   i'm in good company!  My daughters would be surprised at this...

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/02/im-social-media-maverick-too-family.html

Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver

Dear Randy: Do You Ever Check Your Ancestry.com Hints?

On the Many More AncestryDNA Matches Now - and a Bug (Update: Fixed!) (posted 20 February 2014) post, reader Joe Lowry asked:

"Randy, I noticed your shaky tree hint number is really high! Do you ever check your hints, even out of curiousity? How long have you gone without checking them to get the number that high? Just curious."

The short answer is:  Yes, I do, but I don't obsess about it.  There is also an explanation.

1)  On one of the screen shots on the noted post, my Ancestry.com Hints indicated that I had 1533 unreviewed new Hints (in five trees).  If I click on the Hint list at the top of the home page, I can see a list of all of the Hints (well, 20 at a time), and when I click out of that list the number goes down to zero.  The Hints on the tree pedigree view or on a person profile page don't go away until after I've reviewed them.

2)  One of my current Ancestry Member Trees has about 42,000 individuals.  I replace this database every year or two because I keep adding content to my genealogy management program (RootsMagic at this time) and want to update my "cousin bait" tree occasionally.  For this tree, I don't access the green leaf Hints, or attach them to persons in the tree, or click on ignore the hint.  That would be a waste of time, in my humble opinion, because I will replace that tree eventually and get a whole new set of Hints.  

3)  I have another Ancestry Member Tree (my "Hints" tree) which has only my ancestral families in it (with about 7,400 individuals) which I use to add Hints to persons in my ancestral families. I review the Hints in this tree, and review them to attach or ignore them, especially for my ancestral persons.  Then I save the record image (if there is one) to my computer "Downloads" file folder, rename it with my file naming convention, move it to the appropriate Family file folder, and upload it to my genealogy management program as a Media item.  

I go through these Hints every six months or so in order to let them "collect" and then I review them in an orderly way using the Pedigree View in my Ancestry Member Tree.

For instance, here is a view from my "Hints" Ancestry Member Tree:



The screen above shows that Ancestry.com has found 263 more new Hints for me on all of my trees in the system.  

As you can see, I've reviewed all of the Hints through the 16 people in the generation headed by Benjamin Seaver on the chart above.  The view above is for ancestors of Elizabeth Keyes.  I will work on reviewing the Hints for her ancestors with shaky leaves sometime this week.  Then I'll move on to the next person on the list in the generation below Elizabeth Keyes.  

This "Hint" tree is the one I keep synced with Family Tree Maker 2014 and with the iPhone and Android apps (so that I can see what I have when I'm away from home without my laptop or desktop computers).

4)  The real challenge I have with this "Hints" tree is to keep it updated with new information not found on Ancestry.com.  I need to add information for my ancestors (I don't care that much about adding additional information for their siblings or siblings parents) on a regular basis.  So I add the information, either entering it using the keyboard or by merging a small GEDCOM file to my FTM 2014 database, and then sync it to the Ancestry Member Tree.  

5)  Joe asked how often I review the Hints.  It was probably a month or so when he saw my 20 February blog post.  263 more Hints appeared between 20 February and 25 February.  The current new Hint count is zero right now.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/02/dear-randy-do-you-ever-check-your.html

Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver



Tuesday's Tip: There are 26 Wisconsin Historical Collections on FamilySearch

This week's Tuesday's Tip is:  Search Wisconsin Historical Collections on FamilySearch.org.

The list of record collections on FamilySearch.org for Wisconsin is now at 26.  To see the list for any location, go to https://familysearch.org/search/collection/list and enter the state or country name in the search box on the top left of the screen.



The list of record collections available is (with number of indexed records if indexed, and the last update date):

*  Wisconsin, Birth Index, 1820-1907 (985,659 records, 27 Oct 2012)
*  Wisconsin, Births and Christenings, 1826-1926 (1,440,965 records, 24 Jan 2014)
*  Wisconsin, Calumet County, New Holstein Public Library Records, 1900-2001 (Browse Images, 10 Nov 2011)
*  Wisconsin, County Naturalization Records, 1807-1992 (Browse Images, 27 Sep 2012)
*  Wisconsin, Crew Lists of Ship Arrivals, 1925-1956 (Browse Images, 11 Feb 2014)

*  Wisconsin, Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at Manitowoc, 1925-1956 (Browse Images, 11 Feb 2014)
*  Wisconsin, Dane County Naturalization Records, 1887-1945 (Browse Images, 13 Jan 2012)
*  Wisconsin, Death Index, 1820-1907 (435,208, 10 Feb 2012)
*  Wisconsin, Death Index, 1959-1997 (1,629,093, 07 Dec 2011)
*  Wisconsin, Death Records, 1867-1907 (432,959, 24 Jan 2014)

*  Wisconsin, Deaths and Burials, 1835-1968 (34,928, 24 Jan 2014)
*  Wisconsin, Divorce Index, 1965-1984 (231,499, 07 Mar 2012)
*  Wisconsin, Fond du Lac Public Library Records, 1848-1980 (Browse Images, 23 Nov 2011)
*  Wisconsin, Marriage Index, 1973-1997 (948,961, 10 Feb 2012)
*  Wisconsin, Marriages, 1836-1930 (734,524, 24 Mar 2012)

*  Wisconsin, Milwaukee Naturalization Index, 1848-1990 (71,819, 23 Dec 2013)
*  Wisconsin, Milwaukee Petitions to Naturalization, 1848-1991 (Browse Images, 30 Dec 2013)
*  Wisconsin, Outagamie County Records, 1825-1980 (Browse Images, 12 Nov 2011)
*  Wisconsin, Probate Estate Files, 1848-1948 (Browse Images, 21 Nov 2013)
*  Wisconsin, Shawano and Oconto Counties, Indexes and Records, 1850-2007 (Browse Images, 09 Dec 2011)

*  Wisconsin, State Census, 1855 (133,164, 02 Mar 2013)
*  Wisconsin, State Census, 1865 (21,162, 18 Jun 2013)
*  Wisconsin, State Census, 1875 (296,899, 28 Feb 2013)
*  Wisconsin, State Census, 1885 (407,138, 21 Jan 2011)
*  Wisconsin, State Census, 1895 (494,911, 28 Feb 2013)
*  Wisconsin, State Census, 1905 (489,005, 30 Apr 2010)

For the "Browse Images" collections, the user has to click through to find the waypoints in each collection and then search for an index to the records of interest, then search for the actual record using volume numbers and page numbers.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/02/tuesdays-tip-there-are-26-wisconsin.html

Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver


Monday, February 24, 2014

Crafting a Source Citation for the U.S. Veterans Affairs Death File, 1850-2010

In comments on my blog post U.S. Veterans Affairs BIRLS Death File, 1850-2010, on Ancestry.com (dated 2 November 2011), reader Jason W. Crews asked:

"Randy, how do you cite this source? Should I use Evidence Explained 11.36 Military: Headstone & Burial Records - Online Database & Indexes? I could not find anything on EvidenceExplained.com in regards to U.S., Department of Veterans Affairs BIRLS Death File."

Reader Rosemary offered:  "@Jason - I would use a generic online database template for this. I think of it as similar in function to the SSDI."

My grandfather's entry in the "Beneficiary Identification Records Locator Subsystem" on Ancestry.com is:




The title says that it is a "Death File" compiled by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.  Is it a vital record?  Is it a military record?  It has both sets of information.  It's an online searchable indexed database, but it doesn't have record images.  It is on Ancestry.com as a database indexed from records at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

The Ancestry.com source citation for this record is:

Ancestry.com. U.S., Department of Veterans Affairs BIRLS Death File, 1850-2010[database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011.
Original data: Beneficiary Identification Records Locator Subsystem (BIRLS) Death File. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

The Ancestry.com source citation does not describe the specific source detail like the Evidence Explained models do.  If I cite this record, I want to be sure that I, and other researchers who see the citation, can find it again and use it to evaluate all the evidence for the birth date, death date, military enlistment, military release, and military ID number for this person.  

I decided to see which Evidence Explained source citation model that could be used. I think that the most similar record type and record source is the source citation model in Evidence Explained is section 11.33 for the "Military, Draft Registrations," except that the BIRLS database does not have an online image of the record.

In RootsMagic 6, I used the "Military Records, Databases" source template to craft this source citation for my grandfather, Lyle L. Carringer (1891-1976):

Footnote: "U.S., Department of Veterans Affairs BIRLS Death File, 1850-2010," indexed database, Ancestry.com, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 2 November 2011), entry for Lyle Carringer (1891-1976), SSN 553109373; citing Beneficiary Identification Records Locator Subsystem (BIRLS) Death File. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

Short Footnote: "U.S., Department of Veterans Affairs BIRLS Death File, 1850-2010," indexed database, Ancestry.com, entry for Lyle Carringer (1891-1976), SSN 553109373.

Bibliography: "U.S., Department of Veterans Affairs BIRLS Death File, 1850-2010." Indexed database. Ancestry.com. Ancestry.com. http://www.ancestry.com : 2011. 

I usually put the "citing ..." information in the Source Comment field in the RootsMagic source citations rather than include it in the Footnote.

As Rosemary noted, a generic online database source template can be used, and her example of the Social Security Death Index is an excellent suggestion.  The format is the same as the BIRLS Death File - it's an online database without an image created from government records.  

For the record, all of the information in this record matches well with the information about my grandfather's birth, death, enlistment date, release date, and social security number.

Thanks for the question, Jason, and I hope that this helps.  

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/02/crafting-source-citation-for-us.html

Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver


Reminder: OCCGS Genealogy BASH is Saturday, 1 March 2014 in Huntington Beach, California

If you reside in Southern California, I hope that you have put the OCCGS Genealogy BASH and Book Faire on your calendar - it's Saturday, 1 March 2014 at the Huntington Beach (California) Central Library (7111 Talbert Avenue, Huntington Beach CA 92648) from 8 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. 

This is an all-day conference with four session times, 18 genealogy classes and 9 speakers.  The Book Faire will be in Room E from 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.  The BASH sponsor is Legacy Family Tree, and there will be experts available to answer questions about their software product.  There will be other exhibitors also.

Registration for the Genealogy BASH and Book Faire can be done online or by postal mail - see the registration page at http://www.occgs.com/mtg_event/bash/registration.html.  The registration fee is $45 for OCCGS members, $55 for non-OCCGS members, and $10 for a box lunch.  

Here is the flyer (download it here) announcing the details:


The nine speakers, times and their topics, are:

*  Barbara Renick (Theater): 
1:00 p.m.:  How Money Affected Our Ancestors
2:30 p.m.:  Genealogy and Technology: State of the Union

*  Hank Jones (Theater):
9:15 a.m.:  When the Sources Are Wrong
10:45 a.m.: Tracing the Origins of 18th Century Palatine and Other Immigrants

*  Geoff Rasmussen (Room C):
9:15 a.m.:  Genealogist's Guide to Working With Digital Images
10:45 a.m.: Organizing, Planning and Sharing Using Legacy Family Tree

*  Gena Philibert-Ortega (Room B):
10:45 a.m.:  Elusive Genealogy Sources
1:00 p.m.: The Secret Lives of Women: Research Female Ancestors Using the Sources They Left Behind
2:30 p.m.: Enhancing Your Genealogy Using American Memory

*  Colleen Fitzpatrick (Maddy Room):
9:15 a.m.:  A Different Kind of DNA Talk
10:45 a.m.: How DNA Can Help You With Your Family History

*  CeCe Moore (Room C):
1:00 p.m.: Chromosome Mapping With Autosomal DNA: Discovering the Ancestors in You
2:30 p.m.: Real World Stories From the Desk of a DNA Detective

*  Morris Thurston (Room B):
9:15 a.m.: Telling Your Family Story Using Google Earth

*  Linda Serna (Maddy Room):
1:00 p.m.: Using Online Sources to Expand Your Family Story
2:30 p.m.: Foreign Research

*  Chris Hansen and Lloyd Budwig (Balboa Room):
9:15 a.m.: Beginning Genealogy (FREE)
1:00 p.m.: Beginning Genealogy (FREE)

*  Randy Seaver (Talbert Room):
1:00 p.m.: Understanding the Genealogical Proof Standard
2:30 p.m.: Crafting Source Citations the Easy Way

You can read the presentation summaries on the Lecture Summaries page and theSpeaker Biographies here.

I look forward to this all-day seminar each year and making two presentations.  This is the second year - I had a great time last year doing two other presentations.  I hope to see two morning presentations but haven't decided which ones to attend yet.  I also look forward to browsing the genealogy collection at the Huntington Beach library again. 

The URL for this post is:   http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/02/reminder-occgs-genealogy-bash-is.html

Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver

Reminder: Attend the FREE Escondido Family History Fair on Saturday, 1 March

The FREE Escondido (CA) Family History Fair "Life in the Past Lane"  will be on Saturday, 1 March 2014, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m, at the Escondido Family Discovery Center at 2255 Felicita Road in Escondido (760-745-1662).  

The Escondido FHFair website is at http://www.escondidofhc.com/family-history-fair/.


At the top of the page are links for the Fair Information, Workshops OfferedPresenter Biographies,Fair Registration, and Order Lunch (which costs $9.75 and benefits the Boy Scouts).

There are five presenter session times, and a total of 43 classes, with 12 speakers, including Dan Poffenberger, Jean Wilcox Hibben, Debby Horton, Michaele Burris, Ann Montgomery, Tom Underhill, Del Ritchhart, Joel Weintraub, Cassandra Helzer, Ed Ries, Alice Volkert, and Butch Hibben.

Attendees should register to attend, and choose the classes they wish to attend.


This is an excellent opportunity to obtain genealogy education for little or no cost from well-known presenters.  I encourage local San Diego society members to sign up and attend this event.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/02/reminder-southern-california.html

Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver