Saturday, February 21, 2026

Saturday Night Genealogy Fun -- What Are Your Major Genealogy Research Challenges?

 Calling all Genea-Musings Fans: 

It's Saturday Night again - 

Time for some more Genealogy Fun!!


Come on, everybody, join in and accept the mission and execute it with precision. 

1)  What are your major genealogy challenges - the family mysteries that you haven't been able to crack to date? 

2)  Tell us about five of your real genealogy challenges with a short paragraph, and link to blog posts if you have written about them.

3)  Share your five challenges in your own blog post or in a Facebook, SubStack, BlueSky or other social media post.  Leave a link to your post on this blog post to help us find your post.

Here's mine (I did 7):

My seven "real genealogy challenges" are:

a)  Who are Devier James Lamphier Smith's ((my 2nd great-grandfather, 1839-1894) biological parents?  He was adopted in about 1840 in Henderson, Jeffereson County, New York.  One of his birth parents was probably a Lamphier/Lanphere/Lanfear/etc. person.  See 52 Ancestors - Week 19: #26 Devier James Lamphier Smith (1839-1894).

b)  Who are Sarah (Fletcher) Kemp's ((my 3rd great-grandmother, 1802-c1849) parents?  She married Abraham Kemp in Upper Canada in 1818.  See 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks - Week 54: #61, Sarah (Fletcher) Kemp (1802- before 1850). The only resource found to date is a Family Bible page transcript.  

c)  Who are Hannah (Smith) Sawtell's (my 4th great-grandmother,  1768-1827) parents?  She married Josiah Sawtell in Amherst, Massachusetts in 1789.  See 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks - Week 68: #75 Hannah (Smith) Sawtell (1768-1827).  There are way too many Hannah Smiths in eastern Massachusetts in the late 1760s, and not enough definitive records!

d)  Who are William Knapp's (my 3rd great-grandfather, 1775-1856) parents? He was born in New York, married in 1804 and died in New Jersey.  See 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks - Week 51: #58, William Knapp (1775-1856).  There are many Knapp families in southeastern New York and western Connecticut but I cannot connect him.

e)  Who are Mary Palmer's (4th great-grandmother, 1788-1845) parents?  She married James Vaux in Martock, Somerset in 1808, and they emigrated to the United States in the 1830s and settled in Aurora, New York.  See 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks - Week 89: #109 Mary (Palmer) Vaux (1790-ca 1845).  No reasonable birth or death records have been found. 

f)  Who are Philip Row's (my 4th great-grandfather, 1753-1817) parents?  See 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks - Week 94: #114 Philip Row (1753-1817). Some family trees say his parents were  Johannes Rau (1722-1771) and Catherine Loscher of Dutchess County, New York, but I disagree.

g)  Who are Hannah Brown's (my 5th great-grandmother, 1725-1774) parents?  See 52 Ancestors - Week 130: #159 Hannah (Brown) Phillips (about 1725 - before 1774). This is another needle in a Brown family haystack.

===========================


Copyright (c) 2026, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on Twitter, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.comNote that all comments are moderated, and may not appear immediately.

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com.

Using Steve Little's Genealogy Research Assistant V8 to Develop a GPS Proof Summary

As a member of the GeneaBloggers group, I attended Steve Little's webinar on Sunday hosted by GeneaBloggers about using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to improve genealogical writing.  

Steve's 21 page syllabus (with additional text documents linked) was provided in Monday afternoon in Beyond Spell Check: The Steve Little Presentation.  The webinar video is on the GeneaBloggers YouTube channel. 

Here is page 1 of the syllabus which explains Steve's five ways that AI can improve genealogical writing. using his processes:

I reviewed the syllabus, and the first prompt for the "Genealogy Narrative Assistant V3" (GNA), and decided to try it out.  See Using Steve Little's Genealogy Narrative Assistant V3 to Develop a GPS Compliant Narrative Sketch (dated 17 February 2026) for an example.

I then reviewed the second prompt for the "Genealogy Research Assistant V8" (GRA), and tried it out using one of my thorny ancestral research problems. Devier James Lamphier Smith (1839-1894) was adopted as a young child and his birth date and birth place have conflicting evidence. I compiled this record in 2009 and updated it in 2015 in Resolving an Evidence Conflict - Post 2: The Evidence (Updated 2015) with an 1889 newspaper interview article and an 1894 obituary.  An updated genealogical sketch for Devier J. Lamphier Smith is in 52 Ancestors Week 19: #26 Devier James Lamphier Smith (1839-1894).

Steve's Genealogy Research Assistant V8 is designed to:

  • Review your writing against GPS (Genealogical Proof Standard) methodology
  • Flags overclaiming — "definitely" when evidence says "probably"
  • Corrects terminology — "primary source" → "original source" (GPS doesn't use "primary
  • source" for sources — only for information)
  • Three-layer evidence analysis: Sources (original/derivative/authored), Information
  • (primary/secondary), Evidence (direct/indirect/negative)
  • Calibrated confidence language: proved, probable, possible, not proved

I copied the prompt for the GRA from the syllabus and input it to Anthropic Claude. [NOTE: I have only the free account, but Claude provides limited access to the "Thinking" capability (I assume Claude Opus 4.6), so I don't know how much I can do throughout this process.]  

The GRA top prompt is:

"You are a genealogical research assistant operating under the Genealogical Proof Standard (GPS). Help users from beginners to credentialed professionals with GPS-informed analysis."

I chose to not upload all of my source documents for this analysis.  I attached a PDF of my blog post about Devier Smith's birth records, a PDF of Steve's Genealogy Research Assistant V8 Prompt, and launched Anthropic Claude requesting it to apply the Prompt to my problem.

Here is the Analysis by the Genealogy Research Assistant V8 of my problem (with original capitalization and bolding) by Anthropic Claude:


Genealogical Research Assistant v8 Analysis

Devier James Lamphier Smith — Birth Record Conflict



STEP 1: SOURCE & EVIDENCE INVENTORY

Before resolving the conflict, I'll apply the Three-Layer Model to each source bearing on birth date and birth place.


Birth Date Conflict: 1839 vs. 1842

Source

Source Type

Information Type

Informant

Birth Date Implied

Evidence Type

S1 — Family Bible (Devier's hand)

Original

Primary

Devier J. Smith (self)

7 May 1842

Direct

S2 — 1850 U.S. Census

Derivative

Indeterminate

Unknown (prob. Ranslow/Mary Smith)

~1838–1839

Indirect

S3 — 1860 U.S. Census

Derivative

Indeterminate

Unknown (prob. Ranslow/Mary Smith)

~1838–1839

Indirect

S4 — 1870 U.S. Census

Derivative

Indeterminate

Unknown (prob. Devier/Abigail Smith)

~1839–1840

Indirect

S5 — 1880 U.S. Census

Derivative

Indeterminate

Unknown (prob. Devier/Abigail Smith)

~1838–1839

Indirect

S6 — 1875 KS State Census

Derivative

Indeterminate

Unknown (prob. Devier/Abigail Smith)

~1839–1840

Indirect

S7 — 1885 KS State Census

Derivative

Indeterminate

Unknown (prob. Devier/Abigail Smith)

~1838–1839

Indirect

S9 — Cemetery record (1842)

Authored

Secondary

Unknown (prob. son David D. Smith)

1842

Direct

S11 — Abigail's family papers

Original

Secondary

Abigail (Vaux) Smith (widow, post-1894)

7 May 1839

Direct

S12 — 1889 newspaper biography

Authored

Primary

Devier J. Smith (interview subject)

1839

Direct

S13 — 1894 obituary

Authored

Secondary

Prob. son David D. Smith

May 1842

Direct


Birth Place Conflict: New York vs. Wisconsin vs. Ohio

Source

Birth Place Stated

Notes

S2, S3, S4, S5, S6

New York

Five census records, indeterminate informants

S7 — 1885 KS State Census

Ohio

Outlier; same household informant as other censuses

S12 — 1889 newspaper bio

Jefferson County, NY

Primary information — Devier self-reported

S13 — 1894 obituary

Dodge County, Wisconsin

Secondary information; likely son as informant; almost certainly an error



STEP 2: CONFLICT ANALYSIS

Birth Date: Weighing 1839 vs. 1842

The 1839 case:

  • Six census records (S2–S7) across four decades consistently produce calculated birth years of ~1838–1840. While census ages are indirect evidence and individually unreliable, their consistency across independent enumeration events is significant — each census was a fresh recording, not copied from another.

  • S12 (1889 newspaper biography) provides primary information — Devier himself gave 1839 to an interviewing journalist. This is arguably the most analytically powerful single piece: the subject, alive, speaking from personal knowledge (or belief), without obvious motive to misstate.

  • S11 (Abigail's notes, written after Devier's 1894 death) gives 7 May 1839 — the same year as the newspaper interview, and a specific date matching the Family Bible's day and month.

The 1842 case:

  • S1 (Family Bible, Devier's own hand) gives 7 May 1842. This is an original source with primary information — Devier wrote it himself. Family bibles are generally strong evidence. However: the first entries were made in 1889, meaning this was a retrospective recording, not a contemporaneous birth record. The gap between event and recording (~47 years) weakens its primacy.

  • S9 (gravestone/cemetery record) and S13 (obituary) both give 1842, but both likely derive from a single informant — son David D. Smith — making them potentially not independent of each other.

Assessment: The preponderance favors 1839 (more likely ~7 May 1839):

  • The 1889 Family Bible entry and the 1889 newspaper interview were made in the same year. If Devier gave 1839 to the journalist but wrote 1842 in the Bible that same year, he was inconsistent with himself. It is possible he genuinely did not know his birth year with certainty, given adoption/name change circumstances.

  • The son's 1842 date (obituary + gravestone) may reflect what Devier told family in later life — or what was found in family papers — but as secondary information it carries less weight.

  • Abigail's 7 May 1839 is notable: she gives the same day and month as the Family Bible (7 May) but the year consistent with the censuses and interview. This combination suggests the day/month "7 May" is likely correct, and the year dispute is specifically 1839 vs. 1842.

Confidence: Probable that birth year was 1839, and birth date was 7 May 1839. The 1842 date cannot be dismissed — it warrants the label not proved rather than disproved.


Birth Place: Weighing New York vs. Others

  • Ohio (S7 only) is a clear outlier — a single census with no corroboration, same household informant as censuses that say New York. Almost certainly an enumerator or informant error. Weight: negligible.

  • Dodge County, Wisconsin (S13 obituary): The family moved to Wisconsin from New York and Devier was enumerated there in 1850 census. The son likely confused place of residence during childhood with birth place. Weight: low.

  • Jefferson County, New York (S12, primary information from Devier himself in 1889): Combined with five census records stating New York and the contextual note that the Ranslow Smith family resided in Henderson, Jefferson County, NY in 1840, and that the Isaac Lanfear/Lamphier family was in neighboring Lorraine, Jefferson County — this is a strong convergence.

Confidence: Proved (to a genealogical standard) that birth place was Jefferson County, New York, most likely in or near Henderson or Lorraine.



STEP 3: THE NAME/ADOPTION DIMENSION — AND ITS BEARING ON EVIDENCE QUALITY

Source 8 (Wisconsin name change law, 1866) and Source 10 (Ranslow Smith probate, "adopted son Devier J. Lamphear alias Devier J. Smith") establish that Devier was adopted and changed his name. This is critical context for evaluating evidence quality:

  • A person adopted in infancy or early childhood may have genuinely uncertain knowledge of their own birth date and circumstances. This would explain why Devier himself gave contradictory dates (1842 in Bible, 1839 in interview) — he may not have known with certainty.

  • The surname variant "Lamphier / Lamphear / Lanfear" and the Isaac Lanfear family in Lorraine, Jefferson County (with three unmarried daughters of childbearing age c. 1840) provides a strong circumstantial lead to Devier's biological origins.



STEP 4: RECOMMENDED ADDITIONAL SOURCES

Here are targeted record searches to resolve remaining conflicts, prioritized by likely yield:

To Resolve Birth Year (1839 vs. 1842)

  1. Jefferson County, New York birth/baptism records (1838–1842) — Church records (Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian) for Henderson and Lorraine townships. A baptismal entry for a "Lamphier" or "Lanfear" child c. 1839–1842 would be direct evidence. Repository: Local churches, Henderson Town Historian, Jefferson County Historical Society.

  2. 1840 U.S. Census, Jefferson County, NY — Locate the Ranslow Smith household and any Lamphier/Lanfear households. If Devier was born in NY before the family moved to Wisconsin (which they appear to have done before the 1850 census), a male child aged 0–5 in a Lamphier household in 1840 would be significant indirect evidence.

  3. Ranslow Smith family in Wisconsin pre-1850 — Wisconsin territorial/early statehood records. When did the Smiths move? If Ranslow Smith was in NY in 1839–1840 and Devier was in his household by 1850, a NY birth is consistent.

  4. Wisconsin Name Change petition (S8) full text — Does the legislative record include any age statement or other biographical details beyond the name change itself? The full session laws may contain a petition with more detail.

  5. Ranslow Smith probate file, Andrew County, Missouri (S10) — full file review — The index entry references Devier. The full probate file may contain an affidavit, inventory, or testimony that includes Devier's age or birth information stated under oath.

To Identify Biological Parents (Lamphier/Lanfear Connection)

  1. Isaac Lanfear household, 1840 Census, Jefferson County, NY — Identify the three unmarried daughters. Then search for their subsequent marriages, or any child born to an unmarried Lanfear woman c. 1838–1842.

  2. Jefferson County, NY court records (1838–1845) — Bastardy bonds, guardianship records, or any legal record involving a Lamphier/Lanfear child placed for adoption or fostered.

  3. Deed and land records, Jefferson County, NY (Ranslow Smith) — Did Ranslow Smith own land in Jefferson County before moving to Wisconsin? This could establish his presence there at the time of Devier's birth.

  4. Church membership and removal records — If the Smiths and Lanfears attended the same church, a "letter of removal" when moving to Wisconsin might document who came with them.

To Resolve the Ohio Outlier (S7)

  1. This is almost certainly an error and probably does not warrant significant research investment unless other evidence surfaces linking Devier to Ohio.



STEP 5: WRITTEN CONCLUSION (PROOF SUMMARY)

Name: Devier J. Lamphier (biological name) adopted the name Devier J. Smith by Wisconsin legislative act of 21 May 1866. His name appears variously as Devier, D.J., and "Diver" (likely a spelling variant). Proved.

Birth Place: Jefferson County, New York. Supported by Devier's own statement (primary information, S12), five census records, contextual location of the Ranslow Smith family (Henderson) and the Isaac Lanfear family (Lorraine) in Jefferson County c. 1840. Proved to the genealogical proof standard. The 1894 obituary's claim of Dodge County, Wisconsin is almost certainly a secondary-information error reflecting childhood residence, not birthplace.

Birth Date: Most probable birth date is 7 May 1839. The weight of evidence — six census records, Devier's own 1889 interview statement, and his wife Abigail's post-1894 notes (which preserve the "7 May" day/month while giving the year 1839) — preponderates over the 1842 date found in the Family Bible (retrospectively recorded 1889), gravestone, and obituary. However, because Devier himself was inconsistent, and because an adoptee may genuinely have been uncertain of his own birthdate, a proof argument rather than a simple proof statement is the appropriate vehicle. The 1842 date remains possible but is not the most probable conclusion with current evidence.

The unresolved core question — who were Devier's biological parents — is the key to resolving the birth date conflict definitively. A birth or baptismal record from Jefferson County, NY naming a Lamphier/Lanfear child, or an 1840 census entry placing a male infant in a Lanfear household, would likely settle the matter.


Analysis conducted under the Genealogical Proof Standard. Evidence framework per Elizabeth Shown Mills, Evidence Explained. Prompt framework by Steve Little CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

=================================

Thank you to Steve Little for developing this Genealogy Research Assistant V8. I look forward to using it, especially on difficult research problems with conflicting evidence.

My initial assessment of the finished product was "excellent work" and I stand by that assessment after an hour of critically evaluating the result.  I will address the Suggested Records items in a separate blog post.

I hope that other researchers, especially those who are struggling with understanding the GenealogyProof Standard and dealing with conflicting evidence, can improve their research report writing by applying this AI tool. 

How did this compare to my own analysis done in 2009? However, I didn't update that 2009 article with the obituary and 1889 newspaper article. Well, the conclusions are about the same!  Maybe this was too easy for the Genealogy Research Assistant?

I am painfully aware that I need to revise all of my ancestor biographies to include GPS-compliant statements, research notes similar to the Assistant's notes, and improved EE-style source citations. This may take the rest of my life to finish since I have over 550 ancestor genealogical sketches!  Maybe someone else can finish the job?  

I can see adding my finished GPS-compliant sketches to FamilySearch Family Tree profiles as a Memory in PDF format, or add a Memory for the Research Note developed by the Assistant for thorny issues. Also to WikiTree, and to my Person Notes in RootsMagic (which should add them to the Ancestry Member Tree and MyHeritage Family Tree when I synchronize them using the RootsMagic file.  That's probably another lifetime job.

This is only the second Prompt of the five prompts that Steve recommended for use.  I will proceed to the other three Prompts.

==============================================

Links to my blog posts about using Artificial Intelligence are on my Randy's AI and Genealogy page. Links to AI information and articles about Artificial Intelligence in Genealogy by other genealogists are on my AI and Genealogy Compendium page.

Copyright (c) 2026, Randall J. Seaver

The URL for this post is:  https://www.geneamusings.com/2026/02/using-steve-littles-genealogy-research.html

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post. Share it on Twitter, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below. Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com. Please note that all comments are moderated, and may not appear immediately.

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com.


Ask AI: Describe Edward Hildreth Courting Sophia Newton in 1852 in Northbrough, Massachusetts

 After developing the AI-assisted ABC Biography of #18 Edward Hildreth (1831-1899) of Massachusetts and ABC Biography of #19 Sophia (Newton) Hildreth (1834-1923) of Massachusetts (my paternal 2nd-great-grandparents), I wondered how they might have courted in the year of their marriage in 1852.


(AI NotebookLM infographic of Edward and Sophia (Newton) Hildreth in 1852)

I asked Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5 to write a story about it based on information in the biographies (which are based on my genealogical research). Here is the story of Edward Hildreth courting Sophia Newton in 1852 in Northborough, Massachusetts:


A Christmas Wedding: Edward and Sophia's Story, 1852

Spring 1852 - The Meeting

The spring of 1852 found Edward Hildreth settling into life in Northborough, Massachusetts, a young man of twenty-one making his way in the world. He had left behind his childhood home in Townsend and his clerking position in Berlin to learn the trade of combmaking in Worcester County, where the industry was thriving. The work was exacting -- shaping horn and ivory into the combs that every household needed -- but Edward had steady hands and a quick mind for the craft. He was living with the family of his brother Milo in Northborough.

Edward was boarding with his brother Milo's family, a common arrangement for young unmarried men of the era. Living with family provided not just room and board but also the respectability and connection to the community that a young tradesman needed to establish himself. Milo's household would have given Edward a home base as he learned his trade and began to build his future.

Northborough, with its mix of farms and small manufactories, was a close-knit community where everyone knew their neighbors' business. It was the kind of place where a newcomer like Edward would be noticed, assessed, and -- if he proved himself hardworking and respectable -- welcomed.

It was likely at church or perhaps at a community gathering that Edward first noticed Sophia Newton. She was just seventeen, with the fresh beauty of youth, living with her mother, a seamstress, on the modest income they managed together. Sophia (Buck) Newton, her twice-widowed mother, had been left to raise her daughter alone, and at fifty-five, she kept a watchful eye on the young men who showed interest in her girl.

Edward would have been cautious in his approach. A young tradesman courting in 1852 needed to demonstrate not just affection but prospects -- the ability to provide for a wife and future family. His position as a combmaker, while not making him wealthy, showed he had learned a useful trade and could earn a steady living.

Summer 1852 - The Courtship

As spring gave way to summer, Edward found reasons to be where Sophia might be. Perhaps he timed his walks to coincide with her errands to the dry goods store. Maybe he attended the same church services, lingering afterward in the hope of a few words of conversation. In an era of strict propriety, courtship required patience and creativity.

The formal courtship likely began with Edward calling at the Newton home, presenting himself to Mrs. Newton with the respect due a concerned mother. Sitting in the parlor under her watchful gaze, Edward and Sophia would have conversed about safe topics -- the weather, local news, mutual acquaintances -- while stealing glances that spoke volumes more than their careful words.

Mrs. Newton, having survived the loss of two husbands, raising four children, and the challenges of widowhood, would have scrutinized this young combmaker closely. Was he steady in his work? Did he drink to excess? Was he known for honesty and fair dealing? The small-town network of Northborough would have provided answers to these questions, and Edward must have passed the test, for the courtship continued through the warm months.

As summer progressed, the couple would have enjoyed the simple pleasures available to young people of their time. Chaperoned walks after church, perhaps picnics with other young couples, and always those precious moments of conversation that allowed two souls to discover their compatibility. Edward, having left his own family behind in Townsend as his parents aged, may have found comfort in the warm household Sophia shared with her mother. For Sophia, Edward represented not just romance but the promise of a home of her own, the transition from daughter to wife that marked a young woman's passage to adulthood.

Fall 1852 - The Engagement

By autumn, Edward's intentions were clear. He would have approached Mrs. Newton formally to ask for Sophia's hand in marriage. This was no small request -- he was asking to take her only daughter, her companion and helper, into his own household. But Mrs. Newton, practical woman that she must have been, would have recognized that Sophia needed a husband to secure her future, and Edward seemed a solid choice.

The engagement would have been announced to family and friends, setting off a flurry of preparation. Sophia and her mother would have begun assembling her trousseau -- the linens, clothing, and household goods a bride brought to her marriage. Every stitch in the quilts and hemmed sheets represented hours of work and mother-daughter conversation about the life Sophia was about to begin.

Edward, meanwhile, would have worked to ensure he could provide for a wife. As a combmaker, he needed to prove his reliability and skill, perhaps saving every penny he could toward establishing a household. The practical considerations of marriage -- where they would live, how they would manage their finances -- would have occupied much of their conversation during this period.

During these months of preparation, mother and daughter shared many quiet moments together, and Mrs. Newton knew she needed to prepare Sophia for the realities of married life. One evening, as they worked together on the wedding linens, the older woman set aside her needle and looked at her daughter with the wisdom of her own years of marriage and widowhood.

"Marriage is not always easy, my dear girl," she said gently. "There will be times when money is tight, when you'll need to make a little stretch far. You'll have to manage a household on whatever Edward can provide, and some months will be harder than others." She paused, choosing her words carefully. "And motherhood -- when it comes, as I pray it will -- brings its own trials. The birthing bed is a place of both joy and danger, and raising children tests you in ways you cannot yet imagine."

Sophia's eyes grew serious as she listened, but her mother reached across and took her hand. "But you have been raised to be strong, and Edward seems a steady man. You'll face these challenges together, and that makes all the difference. The hardships of life are bearable when you have a good partner beside you. Remember that on the difficult days -- and there will be difficult days -- but remember too that there will be joys that make it all worthwhile."

Christmas 1852 - The Wedding

As December arrived and the Christmas season approached, the young couple prepared for their wedding day. December 25th -- Christmas Day itself -- was an unusual but not unheard-of choice for a wedding. Perhaps it held special meaning for Edward and Sophia, or perhaps the holiday allowed for family members to gather more easily, or maybe it simply seemed auspicious to begin their married life on such a joyful day.

The morning of Saturday, December 25, 1852, dawned cold, as Massachusetts winters tend to be. Sophia, in her best dress (few families could afford elaborate wedding gowns in those days), would have dressed with her mother's help, perhaps feeling the bittersweet mix of excitement and trepidation that attends every bride. For Mrs. Newton, watching her daughter prepare for marriage, the day must have brought its own complex emotions -- pride in seeing Sophia settled, but sadness at the impending change to their household.

Edward, twenty-one years old and about to take on the responsibilities of a husband, likely dressed in his Sunday best and made his way to the appointed place with a heart full of hope and determination. He was starting a new chapter, creating a family of his own to replace the one he'd left behind in Townsend.

The ceremony was performed by Reverend Samuel S. Ashley in Northborough. It would have been a simple service, perhaps with a few family members and friends gathered as witnesses. In 1852, weddings were often brief affairs -- the long white-gown ceremonies we associate with weddings today were still primarily the province of the wealthy. But what the ceremony may have lacked in grandeur, it made up for in sincerity.

The vows exchanged, Edward Hildreth and Sophia Newton became husband and wife. The marriage record would carefully note the details: Edward, age 21, combmaker, born in Townsend, son of Zachariah Hildreth, first marriage. Sophia, age 18, born in Vermont, daughter of Thomas J. Newton, first marriage.

Beginning Their Life Together

As Christmas Day 1852 drew to a close, Edward and Sophia began their married life together. Rather than Sophia moving into the Hildreth household or the couple finding separate lodgings, the practical solution was for the young couple to live with Mrs. Newton. At fifty-five, the widow would have welcomed having her daughter near, and the arrangement made economic sense for a young combmaker just starting out. Edward would contribute to the household expenses while learning to manage a home with his new bride.

The arrangement also meant that Mrs. Newton would not face the loneliness of an empty house, and Sophia would have her mother's guidance as she navigated the early days of marriage and, eventually, motherhood. For Edward, it provided a ready-made home while he continued to build his skills and savings in the combmaking trade.

For Edward and Sophia, Christmas Day 1852 marked the beginning of a partnership that would last nearly forty-seven years, until Edward's death in 1899. They would face joys and sorrows together -- the birth of their daughter Hattie in 1857, moves from Northborough to Leominster, the long years between children, the birth of their son Clarence in 1874, and the heartbreak of losing him just four years later.

But on that Christmas Day, all of that lay in the unknown future. What they had was each other, their youth, their hopes, and the promise of building a life together in the rapidly changing world of mid-19th-century Massachusetts. It was enough. It was everything.

And so, as winter darkness fell on Christmas evening 1852, Edward Hildreth, combmaker, and his bride Sophia began their journey together in the household they would share with mother Sophia—a journey that would span five decades and create a family legacy that would extend far beyond their own lifetimes.

==================================

The Google NotebookLM Video Overview of this story is below. 

This is historical fiction based on known events in the lives of my ancestors - it might have happened this way. The family mentioned is my ancestral family (Edward and Sophia are my 2nd great-grandparents, and I have significant information about their lives from the available records, but know nothing about their day-to-day lives, especially before 1950.

After I read these types of social history summaries, I wish that I could be a time traveler for one day to visit the Hildreth family in Massachusetts in the 1850s and witness their daily lives.  I'm glad that the general lifestyles and occupations are known from historical records and eyewitness accounts.

==============================================

Links to my blog posts about using Artificial Intelligence are on my Randy's AI and Genealogy page.  Links to AI information and articles about Artificial Intelligence in Genealogy by other genealogists are on my AI and Genealogy Compendium page.

Copyright (c) 2026, Randall J. Seaver


Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on Twitter, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.  Note that all comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately.

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com.

Friday, February 20, 2026

Added and Updated FamilySearch Record Collections - Week of 14 to 20 February 2026

  Each week, I try to keep track of the number of Full-Text Search collections (indexed, searchable) and the Images collections (browsable but not searchable) -- see Sections 1) and 2) below. In addition, I list the genealogy historical record collections (often name-indexed) that are added, removed, and/or updated on FamilySearch and listed on the Historical Record Collection list  --  See Section 3.

1)  As of 20 February 2026, there are now 6,672 searchable and full-text transcribed image collections on FamilySearch Full-Text Search this week, an increase o12 from last week. There are over 1.914 BILLION "results" in the collections.  It is not possible to see which collections are new.  

2)  As of 20 February 2026, there are now 24,619 browsable (some indexed, none transcribed) image collections on FamilySearch Images this week, an increase of 26 from last week. There are over 5.932 BILLION images in these collections.  There are 2,100 collections from the United States, 6,901 from Europe and 221 from Canada.  It is not possible to see which collections are new.  



3)  As of 20 February 2026, there are 3,430 Historical Record Collections (many indexed, browsable) on FamilySearch (a decrease of 0 from last week) on the Signed In screen (and 3,430 on the Signed Out screen). 

 The added, deleted, and updated historical record collections this week from FamilySearch (from a list supplied by Marshall Clow):

--- Collections Deleted ---

--- Collections Added ---

--- Collections Updated ---

Arkansas, Naturalization Records, 1903-1981 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/5000029); 14,509 indexed records with 14,137 record images (was 14,508 records with 14,136 images), UPDATED 17-Feb-2026
Belgium, Antwerp, Civil Registration and Church Records, 1798-1909 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/4496124); 472,691 indexed records with 299,182 record images (was 471,989 records with 299,182 images), UPDATED 13-Feb-2026
Belgium, Antwerp, Civil Registration, 1588-1953 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/2138481); 2,632,332 indexed records with 3,208,709 record images (was 2,480,807 records with 3,208,709 images), UPDATED 20-Feb-2026
Belgium, Brabant, Civil Registration, 1582-1950 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1482191); 968,601 indexed records with 6,411,594 record images (was 934,444 records with 6,411,594 images), UPDATED 20-Feb-2026
California, Births and Christenings, 1812-1988 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1674703); Index only (195,340 records), no images (was 195,340 records with 0 images), UPDATED 17-Feb-2026

District of Columbia, Births and Christenings, 1830-1955 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1674779); Index only (9,965 records), no images (was 9,053 records with 0 images), UPDATED 17-Feb-2026
Florida, Births and Christenings, 1880-1935 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1674799); Index only (24,444 records), no images (was 17,736 records with 0 images), UPDATED 17-Feb-2026
France, Calvados, Census, 1836 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/4279958); 1,621 indexed records with 33 record images (was 1,501 records with 52 images), UPDATED 13-Feb-2026
France, Calvados, Military Registration Cards, 1867-1921 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/2815120); 144,114 indexed records with 123,233 record images (was 144,114 records with 127,060 images), UPDATED 17-Feb-2026
France, Marne, Census, 1876 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/4316511); 412,254 indexed records with 7,852 record images (was 144,863 records with 2,756 images), UPDATED 18-Feb-2026

Hawaii, Births and Baptisms, 1843-1925 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/2390841); 73,643 indexed records with 21,448 record images (was 73,635 records with 21,448 images), UPDATED 18-Feb-2026
Hawaii, Census records, 1878-1896 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/3040537); 49,461 indexed records with 3,536 record images (was 49,441 records with 3,536 images), UPDATED 18-Feb-2026
Hawaii, Honolulu, Voter Registration Applications, ca. 1920-1966 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/3758765); 302,474 indexed records with 305,462 record images (was 302,470 records with 305,461 images), UPDATED 18-Feb-2026
Hawaii, Probate Packet Records, 1814-1917 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/3463463); 91,094 indexed records with 87,909 record images (was 91,089 records with 87,110 images), UPDATED 18-Feb-2026
Hawaii, Tax Assessment Rolls, 1847-1903 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/3159284); 103,773 indexed records with 2,324 record images (was 103,265 records with 2,320 images), UPDATED 18-Feb-2026

Hawaii, Various Islands, Circuit Court Divorce Records, 1849-1915 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/3029264); 28,333 indexed records with 46,945 record images (was 28,276 records with 46,945 images), UPDATED 18-Feb-2026
Italy, Genova, Civil Registration (State Archive), 1796-1812, 1838-1859, 1866-1899 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1928859); 592,470 indexed records with 445,302 record images (was 554,444 records with 445,302 images), UPDATED 13-Feb-2026
Italy, Grosseto, Civil Registration (State Archive), 1866-1942 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/2015751); 185,806 indexed records with 393,814 record images (was 149,419 records with 393,814 images), UPDATED 19-Feb-2026
Italy, Vercelli, Vercelli, Civil Registration (State Archive), 1802-1813, 1838-1942 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1939214); 13,235 indexed records with 1,515,946 record images (was 13,235 records with 1,506,772 images), UPDATED 18-Feb-2026
Italy, Vicenza, Bassano del Grappa, Civil Registration (State Archive), 1871-1942 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/2141952); 449,147 indexed records with 1,637,660 record images (was 419,856 records with 1,637,660 images), UPDATED 18-Feb-2026

Kansas, Naturalization Records, 1856-2003 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/4233290); 105,287 indexed records with 77,015 record images (was 105,287 records with 77,015 images), UPDATED 18-Feb-2026
Kansas, State Census, 1925 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/2659395); 1,878,463 indexed records with 59,864 record images (was 1,843,934 records with 59,120 images), UPDATED 19-Feb-2026
Maine, Births and Christenings, 1739-1900 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1674856); Index only (704,390 records), no images (was 703,997 records with 0 images), UPDATED 18-Feb-2026
Nicaragua, Catholic Church Records, 1740-2014 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1494432); 449,434 indexed records with 86,119 record images (was 450,506 records with 86,119 images), UPDATED 19-Feb-2026
Ohio, Western Division Naturalization Records, 1906-1943 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/3241363); 45,332 indexed records with 44,053 record images (was 45,109 records with 44,020 images), UPDATED 18-Feb-2026

Panama, Marriages, 1800-1950 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1520641); Index only (23,311 records), no images (was 21,904 records with 0 images), UPDATED 19-Feb-2026
Pennsylvania, Allegheny, Pittsburgh, Naturalization Card File Index, 1906-1990 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/3037614); 117,185 indexed records with 115,781 record images (was 117,117 records with 115,779 images), UPDATED 19-Feb-2026
Peru, Baptisms, 1556-1930 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1508603); Index only (1,607,738 records), no images (was 1,562,587 records with 0 images), UPDATED 17-Feb-2026
Peru, Catholic Church Records, 1556-2023 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1877097); Index only (3,442,771 records), no images (was 3,409,289 records with 0 images), UPDATED 17-Feb-2026
Peru, Diocese of Huaraz, Catholic Church Records, 1641-2016 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/2787829); Index only (195,858 records), no images (was 181,572 records with 0 images), UPDATED 17-Feb-2026

Peru, Marriages, 1600-1940 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1520547); Index only (111,182 records), no images (was 111,168 records with 0 images), UPDATED 17-Feb-2026
South Africa, Dutch Reformed Church Registers (Cape Town Archives), 1660-1994 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1478678); 2,890,979 indexed records with 45,728 record images (was 2,890,979 records with 45,728 images), UPDATED 18-Feb-2026
Washington, Native American, Census Records, 1880-1952 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/2790178); 140,814 indexed records with 8,301 record images (was 140,797 records with 8,301 images), UPDATED 13-Feb-2026

--- Collections with new images ---

Argentina, Buenos Aires, Civil Registration, 1861-2018 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/5000041); 1 indexed records with 111,695 record images (was 1 records with 111,693 images), last updated 07-Jun-2024
Brazil, Alagoas, Civil Registration, 1876-2023 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/4469403); 1 indexed records with 454,114 record images (was 1 records with 454,098 images), last updated 07-Jun-2024
Brazil, Foreigner Files, 1653-2022 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/5000160); 134,960 indexed records with 3,065,047 record images (was 134,960 records with 2,632,433 images), last updated 11-Feb-2026
Brazil, Maranhão, Civil Registration, 1827-2022 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/4469402); 1 indexed records with 905,956 record images (was 1 records with 905,941 images), last updated 07-Jun-2024
Brazil, Sergipe, Civil Registration, 1866-2021 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/4470324); 1 indexed records with 268,918 record images (was 1 records with 268,915 images), last updated 07-Jun-2024

England, Somerset, Church Records, 1501-1999 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/4380193); 4,285,771 indexed records with 4,814,484 record images (was 4,285,771 records with 4,776,791 images), last updated 04-Jan-2026
France, Loire-Atlantique, Civil Registration, 1792-1960 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/3288440); 2,710,678 indexed records with 2,897,684 record images (was 2,710,678 records with 2,783,499 images), last updated 03-Feb-2026
West Virginia, Births, 1853-1930 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1417341); 1,047,139 indexed records with 1,289,414 record images (was 1,047,139 records with 1,288,274 images), last updated 11-May-2022
West Virginia, Deaths, 1804-1999 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1417434); 2,220,736 indexed records with 2,375,187 record images (was 2,220,736 records with 2,374,856 images), last updated 16-Nov-2023
West Virginia, Marriages, 1780-1970 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/1408729); 1,470,589 indexed records with 35,892 record images (was 1,470,589 records with 35,269 images), last updated 22-Jun-2022

--- Collections with images removed ---

Philippines, Central Luzon, Civil Registration, 1852-2010 (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/5000349); 1 indexed records with 718,461 record images (was 1 records with 718,467 images), last updated 16-Nov-2024

--- Collections with new records ---

--- Collections with records removed ---

===================================

My friend and SDGS colleague, Marshall, has come up with a way to determine which collections are ADDED, DELETED or UPDATED, and to alphabetize the entries in each category. Thanks to Marshall for helping me out here!

Marshall notes that there are:

  • 0 removed entries
  • 0  added entries 
  • 33 updated entries
  • 11 entries with more or fewer images 
  • 0 entries with more or fewer records

==========================================

See previous FamilySearch-related blog posts in     https://www.geneamusings.com/search/label/FamilySearch

Copyright (c) 2026 Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post. Share it on X, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below. Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.  Note that all comments are moderated, so they may not be posted immediately.

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com.