Your mission, should you decide to accept it (and I hope more of you do than participated in the last several SNGF challenges), is to:
1) Determine how complete your genealogy research is. For background, read Crista Cowan's post Family History All Done? What’s Your Number? and Kris Stewart's What Is Your Genealogy "Score?" For comparison purposes, keep the list to 10 or 11 generations with you as the first person.
2) Create a table similar to Crista's second table, and fill it in however you can (you could create an Ahnentafel (Ancestor Name) list and count the number in each generation, or use some other method). Tell us how you calculated the numbers.
3) Show us your table, and calculate your "Ancestral Score" - what is your percentage of known names to possible names (1,023 for 10 generations).
4) For extra credit (or more SNGF), do more generations and add them to your chart.
5) Post your table, and your "Ancestor Score," on your own blog, in a comment to this post, or in a Facebook Status post or Google+ Stream post.
Here's mine:
1) I did this by creating an Ahnentafel Report in RootsMagic 7 (Reports > Lists > Ahnentafel Report) for 15 generations, then saved it as a PDF, opened it, and counted, by hand, the persons on the list in each generation. The numbers included duplicate persons (due to marrying cousins) and persons I had either a first or last name for.
2) My chart (if you want a blank chart in Microsoft Word format, please email me!).
Randy
Seaver's Ancestral Name Score – January 2016
Generation
|
Relationship
|
Possible People
No. Sum1
|
Identified People
No. Sum2
|
Percentage
100*(Sum2/Sum1)
|
||
1
|
You
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
100.00%
|
Parents
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
100.00%
|
|
3
|
Grandparents
|
4
|
7
|
4
|
7
|
100.00%
|
4
|
1x Great-grandparents
|
8
|
15
|
8
|
15
|
100.00%
|
5
|
2x Great-grandparents
|
16
|
31
|
16
|
31
|
100.00%
|
6
|
3x Great-grandparents
|
32
|
63
|
30
|
61
|
96.83%
|
7
|
4x Great-grandparents
|
64
|
127
|
50
|
111
|
87.40%
|
8
|
5x Great-grandparents
|
128
|
255
|
77
|
188
|
73.72%
|
9
|
6x Great-grandparents
|
256
|
511
|
127
|
315
|
61.64%
|
10
|
7x Great-grandparents
|
512
|
1023
|
210
|
525
|
51.32%
|
11
|
8x Great-grandparents
|
1024
|
2047
|
352
|
877
|
42.84%
|
12
|
9x Great-grandparents
|
2048
|
4095
|
497
|
1374
|
33.55%
|
13
|
10x Great-grandparents
|
4096
|
8191
|
321
|
1695
|
20.69%
|
14
|
11x Great-grandparents
|
8192
|
16383
|
290
|
1985
|
12.12%
|
15
|
12x Great-grandparents
|
16384
|
32767
|
163
|
2148
|
6.56%
|
3) My "Ancestor Score" for 10 generations is:
* Number of known ancestral names = 525
* Number of possible ancestral names = 1,023
* 10 generation Ancestral Name Number = 525/1,023 = 51.32%
4) Extra credit: For 15 generations, I have 2,148 known Ancestral Names, out of 32,767 possible, for an Ancestor Score of 6.56% for 15 generations.
It really helps, in my case, to have a New England ancestry for about 50% of my 4th great-grandparents. All of those New England ancestors have English ancestors and those are the lines back to the 15th generation.
Note: I counted only persons in my ahnentafel list that had at least a given name. I didn't count persons with an unknown first name. I disconnected my Smith/Bell line because I know Devier Smith was adopted.
The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2016/01/saturday-night-genealogy-fun-your.html
Copyright (c) 2016, Randall J. Seaver
Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post. Share it on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ or Pinterest using the icons below. Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.