Tuesday, August 4, 2026

Genealogy News Bytes - Week of 29 July to 4 August 2026

 Welcome to Genealogy News Bytes, posted on Tuesday afternoon for the past week, where we try to highlight the most important genealogy and family history news  items that came across our desktop since the last issue.    


1)  Genealogy and Family History News Articles:








2)  DNA Testing and Genetic Genealogy

3)  Genealogy Book/Magazine Notices and Reviews:






4)  Genealogy Software/Mobile Apps


*  Ancestor Map Builder AND Journey Builder [Jason Duncan - webjmd]

*  Introducing TreeScope [Boyle Genealogy by Tracie Boyle]

5)  New or Updated Genealogy Digital Record Collections:















6)  Did you miss the last post in this series?  See Genealogy News Bytes - Week of 22 to 28 July 2026.


                          =========================================


Copyright (c) 2026, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on X, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.  
Note that all comments are moderated, and may not appear immediately.

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com.

Ask AI: "Describe 20 Genealogy Pitfalls While Researching and Building a Family Tree" - Gemini Response

 I requested the free Google Gemini 3 AI tool to list twenty "genealogy pitfalls" that genealogists and family historians make while doing research and building a family tree.  My prompt was "Please describe 20 genealogy pitfalls that genealogists and family historians make while doing research and building their family tree."

(AI Gemini Notebook Infographic - 20 Genealogy Pitfalls that Genealogists Suffer)

The Google Gemini 3 response was:


20 Genealogy Pitfalls While Researching and Building a Family Tree

Here are 20 common genealogy pitfalls that researchers make when searching for family records and building their family trees:

1. Assuming Names Were Spelled Consistently

Expecting ancestral surnames to be spelled the same way in every record. Historical record keepers spelled names phonetically, and ancestors often changed or simplified spellings over time. Always search using wildcards and alternative spellings.

2. Relying Solely on Online Family Trees

Copying branches from public trees on sites like Ancestry or FamilySearch without verifying the underlying primary sources. This perpetuates unchecked errors and "orphan" lineages across multiple family trees.

3. Neglecting to Source and Cite Records

Adding facts to a family tree without recording where the information came from. Without proper citations, it becomes impossible to evaluate the credibility of a claim or retrace your steps later.

4. Conflating Individuals with Similar Names (Name Merging)

Assuming that two people with the same name living in the same general area are the same person. Failing to thoroughly cross-reference birth dates, spouses, and children leads to blended or incorrect lineages.

5. Ignoring Collateral Lines

Focusing exclusively on direct ancestors (parents, grandparents, etc.) and ignoring siblings, aunts, uncles, cousins, and in-laws. Collateral lines often hold crucial clues, land and probate records, and DNA matches that solve brick wall challenges.

6. Misinterpreting Census Data

Taking relationships, ages, and birthplaces in census records at absolute face value. Census enumerators made mistakes, respondents lied about their age, and neighbors or older children were sometimes miscategorized as children or boarders.

7. Falling for "Internet Lore" and Family Myths

Believing romantic family legends (such as "we are descended from royalty" or "three brothers came over from Europe") without demanding documentary proof. Most family myths don't survive rigorous genealogical proof.

8. Jumping Generations Too Quickly

Connecting an ancestor to an older person with the same surname simply because the dates fit roughly. Skipping generational proofs creates impossible timelines and inaccurate lineages.

9. Failing to Exhaust All Localities and Jurisdictions

Searching only in the current county or state where an ancestor lived, without checking historical boundary changes, neighboring counties, or migration paths. County lines and courthouse jurisdictions shifted frequently.

10. Overlooking Women's Maiden Names

Researching married women solely under their husband's surname. Failing to search for marriage records, land and probate documents, and death certificates under a woman's birth surname cuts off half of your ancestral tree.

11. Misunderstanding DNA Results

Assuming a DNA ethnicity estimate or a distant cousin match tells the whole story immediately. Genetic genealogy requires careful triangulation, mapping, and a solid paper trail to interpret accurately.

12. Relying on Extracted Indexes Instead of Original Images

Trusting database transcriptions blindly. Indexers frequently misread faded handwriting, leading to completely incorrect names, dates, and locations in searchable databases. Always view the original document image.

13. Not Building a Chronology or Timeline

Adding random life events to a tree without plotting them out chronologically. A timeline quickly reveals logical impossibilities, such as a child born after a mother's death or a marriage that occurred when a person was five years old.

14. Neglecting Probate and Land Records

Limiting research to vital records (birth, marriage, death) and censuses. Wills, deeds, and land patents often provide the definitive proof of family relationships that vital records lack.

15. Disregarding Negative Searches

Failing to document when you searched a record set and found nothing. Recording negative searches prevents you from wasting hours re-examining the exact same dead ends years later.

16. Assuming Adoption or Step-Relationships Don't Exist

Forcing biological connections onto every historical household. Step-parents, informal adoptions, and foster children were common in the past and are frequently misidentified as biological offspring in early records.

17. Misidentifying Immigrant Origins

Assuming an immigrant ancestor came from a major city just because it was listed as the port of departure or on a naturalization paper. Always look for ship manifests, passenger lists, and hometown church or naturalization records.

18. Failing to Re-evaluate Old Conclusions

Treating early research conclusions as untouchable dogma. As new digital collections are digitized and indexed every day, old assumptions should be regularly re-tested against newly available evidence.

19. Ignoring Social and Historical Context

Analyzing ancestral actions without understanding the historical, economic, or legal backdrop of their era. Knowing local laws, epidemics, wars, and migration triggers helps explain why families moved or vanished from records.

20. Treating the Tree as "Finished"

Believing that a family tree can ever be completely "done." Genealogy is an ongoing process of discovery, correction, and refinement as new records and historical insights come to light.

Biggest Lesson To Be Learned

The biggest overarching lesson in genealogy is that evidence must always outweigh assumption.

Every major mistake in family history research—whether it is copying a flawed online tree, misidentifying an ancestor based on a shared name, or believing a comforting family myth—stems from jumping to conclusions without rigorous proof.

Adopting a "proof mindset" transforms a collection of unverified names and dates into an authentic, accurate family history. This means treating every piece of data as a working hypothesis until it is backed by multiple independent, original sources, primary information, direct evidence, a solid timeline, and careful documentation, including source citations and written conclusions.

=================================

A Google Gemini Notebook Video Overview of this post is below and on my YouTube channel:

What other significant genealogy pitfalls can you think of?  Maybe I should ask Claude, ChatGPT and Perplexity too?

==============================================

Links to my blog posts about using Artificial Intelligence are on my Randy's AI and Genealogy page.  Links to AI information and articles about Artificial Intelligence in Genealogy by other genealogists are on my AI and Genealogy Compendium page.

Copyright (c) 2026, Randall J. Seaver


Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on X, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.  Note that all comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately.

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com. 

Emily and Lyle’s Story: Ordinary Days, January and February 1918

Here is the latest chapter in the story of the courtship and early married life and times of my maternal grandparents, Emily Auble and Lyle Carringer, who married in June 1918. The background information and the list of chapters of their life together are listed at the end of this post.  This is historical fiction with real people and real events, and is how it might have been.

And now we are into the winter of January and February 1918.

I asked my AI Assistant Anthropic Claude to tell the story of Emily and Lyle in January and February 1918 (I offered helpful suggestions...):

(AI Google NotebookLM Infographic:  January-February 1918) 


Emily and Lyle’s Story: The Rhythm of Ordinary Days -- January and February 1918

January — A Good Routine

There is a particular kind of happiness that doesn't announce itself. It arrives quietly, through repetition — the same walk taken enough times that your feet know the way without consulting your mind, the same face seen often enough that its absence would register before its presence does. January 1918 was that kind of month for Lyle Carringer and Emily Auble.

Every Thursday, without exception, Lyle was at Hawthorn Street by nine o'clock. Emily was always ready — had always been ready, though she would not acknowledge that she'd been watching the street from the parlor window since eight forty-five. Georgia would appear briefly in the hallway, confirm their plans for the evening with one or two precise questions, and return to whatever she had been doing with the air of someone whose schedule was entirely her own.

The walk to the waterfront took twenty minutes at an easy pace, which they took, because January in San Diego was not a month that demanded urgency. The harbor was always busy — supply ships, the Navy's growing presence, the particular wartime industry of a port city that understood its own strategic importance. They would stand at the seawall for twenty minutes or half an hour, watching the water, talking about the week just past, and then find their way to the café on Broadway for lunch.

The café had settled entirely into their routine now. The waitress who called them both "honey" had recently begun calling Emily "dear" and Lyle "the Marine," which they both found precise and fair. The chicken salad was reliable. The pie changed. They always ordered it anyway.

After lunch they would walk downtown for a while — sometimes with purpose, window shopping or running an errand, sometimes without, just moving through the city they both knew and loved. Then the trolley to 30th Street, where Austin and Della were always glad to see them both in the specific way that parents are glad when they can see that things are going the way they'd hoped.

January dinners at 30th Street had their own particular character. Austin was deep in winter work at Rockwell Field — training programs accelerating as America's need for pilots grew more urgent — and brought his stories to the table with the organized mind of a man who spent his days troubleshooting. The Jenny biplane, he reported in the second week of January, was performing well under routine training conditions but had a documented tendency in cold temperatures to— and here he would catch himself, remembering that he was at the dinner table and not in a debrief — to behave in ways that required experienced handling.

"In ways that required what?" Lyle asked.

"Experienced handling," Austin repeated, with finality.

"He means it goes sideways," Della said, serving the potatoes.

"Aeronautically sideways," Austin said. "Which is a different category."

Emily asked questions about the aircraft with the genuine curiosity that Austin found irresistible — not social questions designed to extend a conversation but actual questions about how things worked, what the training protocol was, how you taught someone to respond to a machine that was misbehaving at altitude. Austin would sit forward in his chair and explain properly, using the salt and pepper shakers to model relative positions when words got complicated, and the dinner table would become temporarily a briefing room, which everyone found more interesting than the alternative.

Abbie Smith contributed to January dinners from her chair in the parlor — she had developed the habit of remaining in earshot while the younger people ate, participating in the conversation when it interested her and ignoring it when it didn't. On the third Thursday, she asked Emily, without preamble, whether she had any opinions about the New York approach to winter.

"I was born in Illinois," Emily said. "We had opinions about winter."

"Illinois winter is a different category from New York winter," Abbie said, which was, Lyle reflected, exactly the kind of thing his grandmother would say, and exactly the kind of thing that was entirely correct.

Georgia was always waiting at Hawthorn Street when they returned from 30th Street, with dessert ready and the table already set. She had discovered in November that Lyle preferred his coffee strong and that Emily took hers with a small amount of sugar, and she produced these without being asked, which was the highest form of hospitality Georgia offered. The dessert changed from week to week — bread pudding one Thursday, apple cake the next, gingerbread when she felt the week had earned it.

On the second Thursday of January — the seventeenth, a year and two days after the high school dance — Emily brought it up as they walked back from the trolley stop.

"A year ago Thursday," she said.

Lyle calculated. "Almost exactly. The nineteenth was a Friday in 1917."

"The nineteenth," she corrected herself. "Frank Morrison. The gymnasium. You stepping on my toes."

"Once," Lyle said. "I stepped on your toes once."

"Twice," Emily said pleasantly. "But the second time was debatable. The floor was uneven."

He took her hand on the dark January street. "Are you glad I came?"

She looked at him with the expression she wore when a question was beneath its own answer. "Are you?"

"Every day," he said.

She squeezed his hand and didn't say anything, because some things are complete without an answer.

At Hawthorn Street, Georgia had made gingerbread, which told them she had known what the date was and had planned accordingly. She set it on the table without comment, poured the coffee, and sat down with them in the warm kitchen while January moved past outside.

"One year," Emily said, looking at her cup.

"One year," Lyle confirmed.

"Good year," said Georgia, which settled the matter entirely.

Rhythm At the PX

At the PX, January had its own rhythm. The holiday rush had subsided into the regular tempo of a military base in winter — the money orders still moved steadily, men sending home what they could after the Christmas gifts had been posted. Lyle had taken on more responsibility in the inventory and ordering side of the operation, working with Corporal Briggs on supply projections and tracking the patterns he'd been noting in his leather notebook since August.

The notebook was half-full now. He'd developed a system — daily tallies on the left page, anomalies and observations on the right. He had identified three recurring discrepancies in the supply chain that suggested either a counting error at the warehouse or a systematic problem in the requisition process. He had written a careful, factual memo about these discrepancies and placed it on Briggs's desk in the second week of January.

Briggs had read it, made no comment, and forwarded it upward.

In the third week of January, Lyle was called into a meeting with Briggs and Lieutenant Goss, the base supply officer, who asked him to walk through his findings in detail. Lyle did so from his notebook, speaking clearly and specifically, the way he'd learned to present figures at Marston's — no editorializing, just the numbers and what they indicated.

When he finished, Lieutenant Goss was quiet for a moment. Then he said: "How long have you been tracking this?"

"Since August," Lyle said. "When I first started."

"And you didn't report it until January?"

"I wanted to be certain," Lyle said. "Four months of data is more useful than two weeks of suspicion."

Lieutenant Goss looked at Briggs. Briggs looked at the middle distance with the expression he wore when he had already known something and was waiting for everyone else to confirm it.

"Carringer," the Lieutenant said, "do you know what a staff sergeant makes?"

"Yes, sir," Lyle said.

"You might think about it."

Lyle thought about it, on the trolley to Hawthorn Street that Thursday, and decided that thinking about it was exactly the right amount to think about it for now.

February — The Stripe

The promotion came on the fifth of February, issued with the brisk efficiency of an organization that moves paperwork when it has decided to move paperwork. Private First Class Lyle L. Carringer, USMC. The stripe on his sleeve. The additional eight dollars a month in pay.

Hennessey shook his hand and said he'd seen it coming since October. Corporal Briggs made a notation in the duty roster and said nothing, which from Briggs was a ceremony.

Lyle wrote to Emily that evening, in the Waterman ink on the Christmas paper:

My Darling Emily,

Private First Class. The stripe is on my sleeve and the mathematics have changed. Tell your mother I'm making progress.

Thursday. I'll explain further.

All my love, Lyle

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Emily read the letter Tuesday morning at the breakfast table and showed it to Georgia, who read it, set it down, and poured herself more tea.

"Good," Georgia said.

"That's all?"

"What else is needed?" Georgia said, returning the letter. "He was always going to be promoted. Now he has been."

Emily folded the letter and put it in the pocket of her skirt, where she would move it to her bag and then to the drawer in her room where she kept all of them, in order, in the small cedar box that had once held Georgia's correspondence and had been repurposed without ceremony.

At Marston's, she told Gladys.

"Pay raise?" Gladys asked immediately.

"Eight dollars a month."

Gladys performed a rapid mental calculation. "And he's been saving since August," she said. "For the you-know-what."

"He hasn't told me the amount."

"He doesn't need to tell you the amount," Gladys said. "You know the amount."

Emily had, in fact, calculated the approximate amount herself, which she felt was reasonable behavior for someone who intended to be a bookkeeper. "Around May," she said.

"June," Gladys said. "He'll want it to be June."

Emily said nothing, but she thought about the date her mother had mentioned once, the date on the marriage certificate that lived in the cedar box alongside Lyle's letters — June 19, 1898, when Emily's parents had married in Milwaukee, twenty years before.

Valentine's Day, February 14, 1918

The Tivoli on a Thursday in February was its winter self — warmer than outside, the old bar gleaming under the gas lamps, the room populated with the particular mix of San Diego's evening crowd and the Navy's off-duty population that had become characteristic of the city's downtown establishments since the war began.

Lyle arrived at Hawthorn Street with a paper cone of red carnations from the flower concession near the base — the florist hadn't had roses in February, and carnations were, Lyle had decided, underrated by people who associated them with funerals and had never looked at them properly. Georgia accepted them on Emily's behalf, put them in water before Lyle could explain that they were for Emily, and said they would last longer this way.

"Thank you," Lyle said.

"Don't thank me," Georgia said. "I did it for the carnations."

Emily came down the stairs in the deep green wool dress — her second-best, the ivory being reserved — and found Lyle in the hallway holding his cap and looking like a man who has been presented with a carnation situation beyond his control.

"She put them in water," Emily said.

"She moved very quickly."

"She always does." Emily kissed his cheek. 

They walked to the Tivoli in the February evening, the city around them in its wartime quiet — less traffic than before the war, more uniforms, a different quality to the street life that everyone had adjusted to without quite deciding to. The gas lamps along the Gaslamp streets made the night golden, and the Tivoli's corner entrance was bright and welcoming in the way of places that have been welcoming people for thirty years and know how it's done.

The Boston bar gleamed its customary welcome. They found a table near the back, ordered the roast beef as tradition now required, and settled into the easy companionship that a year of Thursday lunches builds into two people.

"Private First Class," Emily said, touching the stripe on his sleeve with one finger.

"Since the fifth," Lyle confirmed. "Eight dollars more a month."

"Gladys says June," Emily said.

Lyle looked at her. "Does she."

"She calculated. So did I."

"I see." He was quiet for a moment, turning his glass. "She's not wrong. June was what I was thinking."

The dinner arrived and they ate, and the Tivoli moved around them in its February way — a table of Navy officers nearby, two older couples, a group of young men who were clearly on liberty and equally clearly not yet old enough to handle it with complete composure.

It was over the apple pie that Lyle said what he had been composing in his mind for two weeks, since the promotion and the mathematics had changed.

"I want to talk about the wedding," he said. "Not the ring yet — that's still a few months. But the wedding itself."

Emily set down her fork. She gave him the full attention.

"I've been thinking about what makes sense," Lyle continued. "Given the war, given the cost, given that we both have people who matter to us but not in the hundreds." He looked at her. "I was thinking small. Family. The Reverend Crabtree. Central Christian. A dinner somewhere modest after."

"I was thinking the same," Emily said.

"Georgia's lemon cake?"

"Obviously Georgia's lemon cake."

"Then we agree on the structure." He looked at her. "What about the date?"

Emily had been thinking about this since Gladys said June, and since she had gone home and looked at the cedar box and taken out the marriage certificate. She looked at Lyle now with the directness she brought to things that mattered.

"My parents were married on June nineteenth, 1898," she said. "It would be their twentieth anniversary this year." She paused. "I don't want to replace what they had. But I think a date that carries something with it is better than a date chosen at random."

Lyle was quiet, thinking about this with the seriousness it deserved. He thought about Emily's father, who had died before Lyle had met Emily. He thought about what it would mean to carry a date that already held something.

"June nineteenth," he said. "1918."

"If you can get the liberty."

"I'll get the liberty." He looked at her steadily. "Emily, I'm going to say this clearly, because I said it last time in the dark outside a pavilion and I think it deserves saying in proper light." He reached across the table and took both her hands. "Will you marry me on June nineteenth, 1918?"

Emily looked at him. Around them, the Tivoli went about its business, entirely unaware that something important was happening at the table near the back.

"Yes," she said. "I will."

The roast beef was done. The apple pie was finished. The gas lamps did what gas lamps do, which is to make everything look warmer than it is. Outside, San Diego was still February, still wartime, still uncertain about a hundred things that wouldn't be resolved for years.

Inside the Tivoli, Lyle Carringer held Emily Auble's hands across the table and both of them knew that June was coming, that a date had been chosen, that a future had moved from possible to planned.

"We should dance," Emily said.

They had discovered in December that the Tivoli had a small cleared space near the back on Thursday evenings when the crowd thinned, barely large enough for two people, where the sound from the corner musician's guitar was good enough for the purpose.

The guitarist was playing something slow, the kind of melody that knows it's February and accounts for it.

Lyle stood and offered his hand. Emily took it.

They danced in the back of the Tivoli on Valentine's Day, 1918, in the light of gas lamps that had been burning since before either of them was born. They danced slowly, because the music was slow and February deserved slowness. And when the song ended and another began—quicker this time, the guitarist finding a different gear—they danced quickly, because that was also who they were: the kind of people who could do both, together, without losing each other in the change.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Postscript — written that night at the barracks:

My Darling Emily,

June nineteenth.

I'm writing it down so it exists in the right ink on the right paper.

I'll get the ring before May. I'll get the liberty for June. I'll speak to Reverend Crabtree on the next Thursday we pass by the church.

The rest — the cake, the family, the day itself — I leave to you and Georgia, because you will do it better than I could plan it, and because the day should be yours before it is mine.

One hundred and twenty-five days. I have written it in the notebook.

I love you, Emily. I have loved you since January 1917, and I intend to love you until considerably after that.

Yours entirely,
Lyle

==============================

Here is the Video Overview of this story by Google NotebookLM (also on my YouTube channel here):  

This is historical fiction based on the facts that are available for the life and family of my maternal grandparents, Lyle and Emily(Auble) Carringer.  It is based on my research, social history and society norms at the time and place, and it is likely realistic. It might have happened this way.

Stay tuned for the next chapters in this family story.

                                                          ==========================

The AI-assisted biography of my maternal grandmother is in ABC Biography of #7 Emily Kemp (Auble) Carringer (1899-1977) of Illinois and California. I wrote a story about her life in 1916 in Ask AI: Describe Emily Auble's Life After the Death of Her Father In 1916.

The AI-assisted biography of my maternal grandfather is in ABC Biography of #6 Lyle Lawrence Carringer (1891-1976) of San Diego, California. I wrote a story about Lyle being a young working man in 1916 being teased about being boring in Lyle's Story: Finding Courage in 1916-1917.

Then I wrote seven more chapters of their life together:                   
==============================================

Links to my blog posts about using Artificial Intelligence are on my Randy's AI and Genealogy page.  Links to AI information and articles about Artificial Intelligence in Genealogy by other genealogists are on my AI and Genealogy Compendium page.

Copyright (c) 2026, Randall J. Seaver


Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on X, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.  Note that all comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately.

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com.

Monday, August 3, 2026

Randy's Genealogy Pot-Pourri - Week Ending 2 August 2026

 Here are the highlights of my family history and genealogy related activities over the past week (ending Sunday, 2 August 2026). 

1)  Attended the Chula Vista Genealogical Society (CVGS) General Meeting on Wednesday with Allison DePrey Singleton as the speaker on "Getting to Know The Genealogy Center: Researching from Home" (about Allen County Public Library offerings).

2)  Attened the San Diego Genealogical Society (SDGS) DNA Interest Group meeting on Saturday with Colin Whitney presenting his "Ancestry 2026" update.

3)  Curated genealogy-related articles to keep myself and my readers updated on the genealogy world in:

8)  Wrote an AI-assisted short story about my grandparents lives and romance on Genea-Musings and Substack:
9)  Posted another genealogy-related poem "The Genealogist's Lament" and song "The Genealogy Blues" in An AI Poem -- "The Genealogist's Lament," and AI Song "The Genealogy Blues." Used Canva.com to put the song video on YouTube.

10)   Posted a genealogy-related poem and song written a year ago but never posted in An AI Poem -- "The Genealogist's Lament," and AI Song "The Genealogy Blues."

11)  Housekeeping -- updated my Randy's AI and Genealogy page.  Added a number of the recent Google NotebookLM Videos to my YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/@RandySeaver.

12)  Checked out Jason Duncan's Ancestor Map Builder 2.0Pretty useful, will probably be improved over time.

13)  Searched for more records of ancestral families on Ancestry, FamilySearch and MyHeritage, downloaded record images to my digital file folders, and added research notes, events and sources to RootsMagic profiles.  My RootsMagic family tree now has 75,119 profiles (up 0 from last week)  and 148,075 source citations (up 3).  

14)  My AncestryDNA test now has 52,308 DNA matches (up 55 from 26 July) with 2,219  "close" matches (20 cM or more) today (up 5), with 1 New ThruLines.  Added Notes to no Matches, and added no new DNA match lines to RootsMagic. MyHeritageDNA test now has 14,773 DNA matches (up 27 from 26 July) for me, with 26 Theories of Family Relativity.  

15) Wrote 23 Genea-Musings blog posts last week (Sunday through Saturday), of which one was a press release. The most viewed post last week was Amanuensis Monday -- 1793 Quitclaim Deed of David Kirby to John Kirby for Land in Westport, Bristol County, Massachusetts with 307 views.  Genea-Musings had about 354,000 page views last week and over 902,000 views over the past month (lots of bots I think). 

16)  Real life events:  Visited Linda several days this past week at her memory care facility.  Went to the grocery store on Monday and Friday. Finished reading Double Tap by Steve Martini and started Billy Striaght by Jonathan Kellerman. Watched the Padres games - they were 5-1 this past week and are 58-54.

NOTE:  I spent about 30 hours on these genealogy activities this wee,  learned quite a bit, and had some genealogy fun!.  

                           =============================================

Copyright (c) 2026, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post. Share it on X, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below. Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.  Please note that all comments are moderated and may not appear immediately. 

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com.