Saturday, April 12, 2025

Saturday Night Genealogy Fun -- Two Truths And One Lie

 Calling all Genea-Musings Fans: 

 It's Saturday Night again - 

Time for some more Genealogy Fun!!


Come on, everybody, join in and accept the mission and execute it with precision. 

1)  Let's play the game "Two Truths - One Lie."  Tell three family stories - two must be true, and one must be a lie - an untruth.

2)  Have your readers guess which story was the lie, and their reasons for picking that story.

3)  Share your three stories on your own blog, on Facebook or other social media, or in a Comment on this blog.  Share the link to your stories on this blog, so readers can respond.

4)  After all Comments are in, share the Lie in a Comment on your post.

Here's mine:

1)  My 2nd great-grandmother, Rebecca (Spangler) Carringer (1832-1901) died after a tornado on her farm in Washington County, Iowa.

2)  My 2nd great-grandfather James Richman (1821-1912) migrated in 1855 from Wiltshire to New York City because he was embarrassed to be accused of stealing coal on the canal near Hilperton, Wiltshire.

3)  My 5th great-grandfather, Norman Seaver (1734-1787) died after falling off the roof of the church in Westminster, Massachusetts.

Which story is the lie?  Why do you think that story is the lie?  

UPDATE 14 April 2025:  #1 is the lie - the tornado happened in 1873 in Iowa, and Rebecca died in 1901.  Janice knows my family too well, I think - perhaps because I wrote an AI post about the incident just a week ago.   

#2 is true - the church record said "because his reputation was besmirched..." but I think he was planning on coming to America anyway.  He came and his wife and children came a year later.

#3 is true according to the Westminster, Mass. town history.

==============================================


Copyright (c) 2025, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on Twitter, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.comNote that all comments are moderated, and may not appear immediately.

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com.


Ask AI: "Please Describe the Process of Creating Clothing From Sheep Wool in New England in the 1850-1900 Time Frame"

 The Artificial Intelligence tools (like ChatGPT4, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Meta, CoPilot, GenSpark, DeepSeek, and Perplexity) can provide much useful and nearly instant information about subjects in a concise format, especially when they have been pre-trained on a large volume of information about the subjects.

1)  I wondered about making fabric and clothes in the 19th century, since several of my second and third great-grandparents (Richman and Rich) in Wiltshire, England and New England, and their children, were weavers and/or worked in a woolen mill, in the 1850 to 1900 time frame.

My prompt was:   "You are an expert in textile manufacturing history.  How did wool get from a sheep to a man's suit or woman's dress in the 1850-1900 time frame in New England?  What jobs were there, who performed them, and what machines were used.  How did technology change over this time period?"


(image created by Google Gemini 2.0 Flash)

2)  I used the Grok 3 response for this question:

The process of transforming wool from a sheep into a finished suit or dress in New England between 1850 and 1900 was a complex journey involving multiple stages, skilled labor, and evolving machinery. During this period, the textile industry was a cornerstone of New England’s economy, particularly in states like Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Maine. Below, I’ll outline the key steps, the jobs and workers involved, the machines used, and how technology evolved over this time frame.
Overview of the Process
The journey from sheep to finished garment involved several stages: shearing, sorting and cleaning, carding, spinning, weaving, dyeing, finishing, and tailoring or dressmaking. By the mid-19th century, much of this process had shifted from small-scale, home-based production to large, mechanized factories, though some tasks remained manual or semi-mechanized.
Step-by-Step Process (1850–1900)
  1. Shearing the Sheep
    • Description: The process began with shearing, where wool was cut from the sheep, typically in spring to ensure the fleece was clean and at its peak length.
    • Jobs and Workers:
      • Shearers: Mostly men, often farmers or hired laborers, used hand shears to remove the fleece. Shearing required skill to avoid injuring the sheep and to maximize wool yield. In New England, shearers were typically local farmers or itinerant workers who traveled between farms.
    • Machines/Tools:
      • Hand shears (two-bladed scissors) were standard in the 1850s. By the 1880s, early mechanical clippers began to appear, though they were rare in New England until after 1900.
    • Technological Change:
      • Shearing remained largely manual throughout this period. Mechanical shears, powered by hand-cranked or foot-pedal mechanisms, started to emerge in the 1890s but were not widely adopted until the early 20th century.
  2. Sorting and Cleaning (Scouring)
    • Description: Raw wool was greasy, full of lanolin, dirt, and vegetable matter. Sorting separated high-quality wool (from the back and sides) from coarser wool (from the legs or belly). Scouring removed impurities.
    • Jobs and Workers:
      • Wool Sorters: Skilled workers, often men, who graded wool by quality and type. This job required experience to assess fiber length and fineness.
      • Scourers: Men and women operated scouring vats or assisted with washing. Women were increasingly involved in factory-based cleaning by the 1870s.
      • Child Laborers: Children sometimes assisted in sorting or picking out debris, especially in smaller mills.
    • Machines/Tools:
      • In the 1850s, wool was often cleaned by hand in tubs with soap and water. By the 1860s, mechanical scouring machines—large vats with rollers or agitators—began to automate the process.
      • Willowing Machines: Used to remove burrs and dirt before scouring, these machines shook or beat the wool.
    • Technological Change:
      • Scouring machines became more efficient by the 1880s, using steam power to heat water and agitate wool. Chemical detergents, like soda ash, improved cleaning, reducing reliance on manual labor.
  3. Carding
    • Description: Carding aligned wool fibers into a loose, continuous web or sliver, preparing it for spinning. This step removed remaining impurities and blended fibers for uniformity.
    • Jobs and Workers:
      • Carders: Men and women operated carding machines in factories. This was semi-skilled work, as operators needed to adjust machines to avoid damaging fibers.
      • Card Room Hands: Often young women or adolescents, they fed wool into machines and cleaned equipment.
    • Machines/Tools:
      • Carding Engines: Large, steam-powered machines with rotating cylinders covered in wire teeth (cards) replaced hand carding by the 1850s. The Crighton carding machine was common in New England mills.
    • Technological Change:
      • Carding machines became faster and more precise by the 1870s, with improvements in cylinder design and automation. Double-cylinder carders increased output, reducing labor needs.
  4. Spinning
    • Description: Spinning twisted carded wool into yarn or thread, determining its thickness and strength for weaving.
    • Jobs and Workers:
      • Spinners: Mostly women and girls operated spinning machines. This was a key factory job, requiring dexterity to repair broken threads and monitor machine output.
      • Doffers: Young boys or girls replaced full bobbins with empty ones on spinning frames.
      • Overseers: Men supervised spinning rooms, ensuring productivity and machine maintenance.
    • Machines/Tools:
      • Spinning Mules: The self-acting mule (invented earlier but refined in the 1850s) was widely used. It stretched and twisted wool into fine yarn.
      • Ring Spinning Frames: Introduced in the 1870s, these were faster and produced stronger yarn, gradually replacing mules for coarser wool.
    • Technological Change:
      • Ring spinning gained popularity by the 1880s due to its speed and reliability. Steam-powered mules and frames increased production, reducing the need for skilled spinners.
  5. Weaving
    • Description: Yarn was woven into fabric on looms, creating woolen (soft, fuzzy) or worsted (smooth, tightly woven) cloth for suits and dresses.
    • Jobs and Workers:
      • Weavers: Men and women operated looms. Women dominated weaving rooms by the 1870s, as the job became less physically demanding with mechanization.
      • Loom Fixers: Men maintained and repaired looms, a skilled trade requiring mechanical knowledge.
      • Warpers and Beamers: Workers (often women) prepared yarn for looms by arranging it on beams.
    • Machines/Tools:
      • Power Looms: The Crompton loom (for woolens) and Northrop loom (introduced in the 1890s for simpler fabrics) were standard. Worsted fabrics required specialized looms for tighter weaves.
      • Jacquard Looms: Used for patterned fabrics, these were operated by skilled weavers for high-end dresses.
    • Technological Change:
      • Power looms became faster and more automated. The Northrop loom (1890s) introduced automatic shuttle changes, reducing downtime. Steam engines powered larger looms, increasing output.
  6. Dyeing
    • Description: Fabric or yarn was dyed to achieve desired colors. Wool was often dyed after weaving, though yarn-dyeing was used for patterns.
    • Jobs and Workers:
      • Dyers: Skilled men mixed dyes and oversaw vats. Knowledge of chemical reactions was critical.
      • Dye House Workers: Men and women handled fabric immersion and rinsing, often in harsh conditions.
    • Machines/Tools:
      • Large dye vats and steam-heated kettles were used. By the 1870s, mechanical agitators ensured even dye distribution.
    • Technological Change:
      • Synthetic dyes (e.g., aniline dyes, introduced in the 1860s) replaced natural dyes, offering brighter, more consistent colors. Automated dyeing machines emerged by the 1890s, improving efficiency.
  7. Finishing
    • Description: Finishing included processes like fulling (shrinking and felting wool), napping (raising a soft surface), shearing (cutting nap for smoothness), and pressing to prepare fabric for garments.
    • Jobs and Workers:
      • Fullers: Men operated fulling mills or machines to compact fabric.
      • Nappers and Shearers: Men and women used machines to raise and trim the fabric surface.
      • Pressers: Workers (often men) used heavy presses to smooth fabric.
    • Machines/Tools:
      • Fulling Mills: Water- or steam-powered machines pounded fabric to shrink it.
      • Gig Mills: Raised the nap with teasels or wire brushes.
      • Shearing Machines: Cut nap evenly, replacing hand shears by the 1860s.
      • Steam Presses: Flattened fabric for a polished look.
    • Technological Change:
      • Finishing machines became more automated, with steam-powered gig mills and shearing machines increasing precision. Hydraulic presses (1880s) improved fabric smoothness.
  8. Tailoring or Dressmaking
    • Description: Finished wool fabric was cut and sewn into suits or dresses, either in small shops or, increasingly, in ready-made clothing factories.
    • Jobs and Workers:
      • Tailors: Mostly men, they cut and sewed men’s suits, requiring precision for fit. Custom tailors served wealthier clients, while factory tailors produced ready-made garments.
      • Dressmakers: Women designed and sewed dresses, often working from home or in small shops. By the 1890s, dressmaking factories employed women for mass production.
      • Seamstresses: Women performed repetitive sewing tasks, especially in factories.
      • Cutters: Skilled men marked and cut fabric based on patterns.
    • Machines/Tools:
      • Sewing Machines: The Singer sewing machine (patented 1851) revolutionized garment production. By the 1870s, foot-pedal models were common in homes and factories.
      • Cutting Tools: Hand shears and, later, mechanical cutting machines for factories.
    • Technological Change:
      • Sewing machines became electric by the 1890s, speeding up production. Ready-made clothing factories adopted standardized patterns, reducing custom work. Band-saw cutting machines (1880s) allowed precise cutting of multiple fabric layers.
Workforce Demographics
  • Gender: Women and girls made up a significant portion of the textile workforce, especially in spinning, weaving, and sewing. Men dominated skilled trades like dyeing, loom fixing, and tailoring, though women began entering these roles by the 1890s.
  • Age: Child labor was common in the 1850s–1870s, with children as young as 10 working as doffers or card room hands. Labor laws in the 1880s raised minimum ages and limited hours.
  • Ethnicity: Early mills (1850s) employed native-born New Englanders, often young women from rural areas (the “Lowell mill girls”). By the 1870s, Irish, French-Canadian, and later Eastern European immigrants filled factory jobs as urbanization grew.
  • Conditions: Factory work was grueling, with 10–12-hour days, loud machinery, and poor ventilation. Wages were low, especially for women and children, though skilled workers like loom fixers earned more.
Technological Evolution (1850–1900)
  • Mechanization: The shift from water-powered to steam-powered machinery (1860s–1880s) allowed mills to operate year-round and scale up production. Steam engines powered carders, looms, and spinning frames, increasing output.
  • Automation: Self-acting mules, ring spinning, and automatic looms (e.g., Northrop) reduced the need for skilled labor, making production faster and cheaper.
  • Synthetic Dyes: The introduction of aniline dyes transformed aesthetics, enabling vibrant colors that appealed to fashion-conscious consumers.
  • Sewing and Cutting: The sewing machine and, later, electric cutting tools revolutionized garment production, paving the way for ready-made clothing by the 1890s.
  • Transportation: Railroads expanded wool and fabric distribution, connecting New England mills to national markets and reducing reliance on local sheep farms (Western wool began to dominate by the 1880s).
Impact on Suits and Dresses
  • Men’s Suits: Woolen or worsted suits became standardized, with factories producing affordable, ready-made options by the 1880s. Custom tailoring persisted for the wealthy, using finer worsted fabrics.
  • Women’s Dresses: Wool dresses ranged from sturdy, everyday garments to elaborate, patterned designs for the middle and upper classes. Dressmaking remained labor-intensive, but ready-made dresses grew common by the 1890s, driven by sewing machine efficiency.
Conclusion
From sheep to suit or dress, the wool textile industry in 1850–1900 New England was a blend of manual skill and mechanized innovation. Jobs ranged from shearers and sorters to spinners, weavers, and tailors, with women and immigrants playing increasingly central roles. Machines like carding engines, spinning mules, power looms, and sewing machines transformed production, while steam power and synthetic dyes boosted efficiency and variety. By 1900, technological advances had shifted the industry toward mass production, making wool garments more accessible and setting the stage for the modern clothing industry. 
If you’d like me to dive deeper into a specific stage, machine, or worker role, let me know!

3)  My second prompt was:  "How long did it take to make a man's suit from sheep wool to suit on the rack?"

Grok 3 described each step in the process as it changed over time due to better technology (but it is not included herein).  The Grok 3 conclusion was:

Conclusion

For a man’s wool suit in 1870s–1880s New England, the process typically took 20–30 days for a ready-made suit on the rack, assuming efficient factory production and pre-sheared wool. Custom suits took 30–40 days due to slower, personalized tailoring. These estimates reflect the era’s balance of mechanized mills and labor-intensive garment-making, with ready-made production becoming faster and more common by the 1890s as technology and infrastructure improved.

4)  The reason I asked the second question is because the published biography of my 2nd great-grandfather James Richmond (1821-1912) has this paragraph:

"James Richmond, above mentioned, is an expert in his line, as is evidenced by the fact that he had charge of the famous feat of making a suit of clothes in six hours and four minutes.  In the hands of a tailor supplied with materials this might not seem an impossible undertaking, but in this instance the wool was taken from the back of the sheep and placed on the back of the wearer in the shape of a finished suit, within the specified time of six hours and two minutes."

I think that this "famous feat" was performed by the son of James and Hannah (Rich) Richman, James Richmond (1849-1929), with everything set up for him to actually take the wool and create clothing in a custom manner - going one step at a time and using machines in the 1890s (and perhaps ignoring some of the steps in the process, like dyeing).

5)  The Grok 3 response to the prompts was interesting and probably is accurate.  Making clothes was not a quick and easy process!   I may ask the same question about the process used in England during the 18th and early 19th centuries. 

I asked the same questions of ChatGPT4 and Gemini and received essentially the same responses. 

==============================================

Links to my blog posts about using Artificial Intelligence are on my Randy's AI and Genealogy page.  Links to AI information and articles about Artificial Intelligence in Genealogy by other genealogists are on my AI and Genealogy Compendium page.

Copyright (c) 2025, Randall J. Seaver

The URL for this post is:  https://www.geneamusings.com/2025/04/ask-ai-please-describe-process-of.html

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on X, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.  Note that all comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately.

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com.