Saturday, March 7, 2026

Randy (Not) at RootsTech 2026 - Day 3 (Saturday, 7 March) Activities

The third day of the  2026 Conference was live in Salt Lake City, Utah with thousands of persons in attendance, and thousands more watching some of the conference classes online for free.  I chose to be an online viewer rather than an in-person attendee due to my physical restrictions.

1)  Over the past week, I selected online classes for "My Schedule" and have downloaded syllabus articles and slide decks for many of the online and in-person classes.   You can see the current list of RootsTech 2026 online and in-person speakers and presentation titles in https://www.familysearch.org/en/rootstech/schedule/preview.

2)  My activities today were sandwiched around my visit to the Men'sa Bible Study in the morning, a nap in the afternoon, but I was able to watch some of the classes on my class schedule.   Here are the classes that I watched, either partially or completely:

Are you struggling to find your ancestors’ parents? Learn how to bust those brick walls and find your family by using a variety of sources. This lecture is geared for more advanced researchers and examines two kinship case studies for an Ohio couple who moved west. This advanced-level session is sponsored by BCG and ICAPGen.
  • The Future of AI in Genealogy – Panel with David Ouimette (FamilySearch), Steve Little (NGS), Diana Elder (Family Locket), Dave Vance (FTDNA) and Mark Thompson (Moderator). 
The panel was asked these questions:
  • How AI is impacting genealogy — what is working today, and what is still on the horizon
  • What is driving the change — inside the companies building these tools and among the researchers using them
  • Are we going too fast or too slow — balancing the enormous potential of AI with the need for accuracy, privacy, and trust. 
In DNA Swim School Part 3, you’re ready to go beyond grouping matches—you want to figure out how they’re related to each other and to you. But what if your match network feels incomplete or unclear?

This session is all about what to do when the simple path doesn’t appear. You’ll learn how to take stock of what you do know, test hypotheses using tools like Shared Matches of Matches (SMoMs) and WATO (What Are the Odds?), and follow a process to move forward even when your network isn’t perfectly connected.

NOTE:  Stopped watching – no slides were shown - PICNIC happens.
No matter how long you've been a genealogist, asking yourself the right questions can transform your research and your writing. In this session, we’ll look at how questioning yourself can guide you from the beginning of your process through testing hypotheses, assumptions, deepening analysis, and refining writing. Whether you’re working through conflicting evidence, or polishing your proof arguments, these straightforward strategies will help you sharpen your work. Attendees will benefit from a thorough understanding of the Genealogical Proof Standards and BCG Genealogy Standards. This advanced-level session is sponsored by BCG and ICAPGen.

3)  I checked the Relatives at RootsTech page tonight and saw that I have 49,995 relatives listed at RootsTech 2026 (down from over 74,000 in 2025).


My closest Relative at RootsTech is a first cousin 1x removed whom I know in my Seaver line, and the next closest cousin is George, a 3rd cousin 1x removed in my Kemp line.  I am randyseaver1 if you want to see how I am related to you.  

4)  Finally, this conference is over.  There will be more news articles about it that describe the highlights, and some blog posts, Facebook photographs, and YouTube videos.  I will report the most important ones as I wander through the genealogy weeds in the next weeks.

=============================================

Disclosure:  I am a RootsTech 2026 "Influencer" but will receive no remuneration for my support or posting of RootsTech information.  I will be an online participant this year because of my health issues.

The URL for this post is:  https://www.geneamusings.com/2026/03/randy-not-at-rootstech-2026-day-3.html

Copyright (c) 2026, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post. Share it on Twitter, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below. Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.    I moderate all comments and they may not appear immediately - please write only one comment.

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com.


Saturday Night Genealogy Fun -- Your Favorite Online Class At RootsTech 2026

 Calling all Genea-Musings Fans: 

It's Saturday Night again - 

Time for some more Genealogy Fun!!


Come on, everybody, join in and accept the mission and execute it with precision. 

1)  RootsTech 2026 just finished today.  Did you watch any classes online?  

2)  Which online class was your favorite, perhaps the most informative, most helpful, or most entertaining, for you?  

3)  Share your selected online class in your own blog post, or in a Facebook, SubStack, BlueSky or other social media post.  Leave a link to your post on this blog post to help us find your post.

Here's mine:

I "attended" RootsTech 2026 online all three days, and have daily posts highlighting my viewing selections. See Randy (Not) at RootsTech 2026 - Day 1 (Thursday, 5 March) ActivitiesRandy (Not) at RootsTech 2026 - Day 2 (Friday, 6 March) Activities, and Randy (Not) at RootsTech 2026 - Day 3 (Saturday, 7 March) Activities.

My most useful online class was Daniel Horowitz's Genealogy, Upgraded: AI and Smart Tools on MyHeritage class on Thursday.  Daniel covered AI-enhanced Records, Photo enhancing, Photo colorizing, Time Machine, LiveMemory, AI Biography, the NEW Scribe AI, and the NEW Color Coding for Family Trees.  

Of most help to me was the NEW Scribe AI tool that transcribes, translates (if requested), interprets, summarizes and describes a document, image, or other record. I applied it immediately to an Italian birth record in Trying Out the MyHeritage Scribe AI Tool To Transcribe, Translate, Interpret and Describe An Italian Birth Record.

The most entertaining class for me was Steve Little's AI & Family History: Foundations & First Steps: Mastering AI Basics for Genealogy presentation. Steve is funny, and even pulled out his smart phone to ask ChatGPT some questions. 

An online classes that informed me was What’s New at Ancestry® by Crista Cowan of Ancestry.com.  She reviewed many of the new features on the Ancestry website.

===========================


Copyright (c) 2026, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on Twitter, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.comNote that all comments are moderated, and may not appear immediately.

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com.

Ask AI: Describe the Courtship and Marriage of Norman Seaver and Sarah Read in 1755 in Sudbury, Massachusetts Bay Colony

The Artificial Intelligence tools (like ChatGPT, Claude, CoPilot, Gemini, Grok, Meta, Grok, and Perplexity) can provide much useful and nearly instant information about subjects in a concise format, especially when they have been pre-trained on a large volume of information about the subjects.

I wondered if the FREE AI tools could provide me with information about the courtship and marriage of my 5th great-grandparents, Norman Seaver and Sarah Read.

 My genealogical sketch for Norman Seaver is 52 Ancestors - Week 105: #128 Norman Seaver (1734-1787), based on my genealogical research.

(AI NotebookLM Infographic of the courtship and marriage of Norman Seaver and Sarah Read)

1)  My Prompt to free Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5 was:  "Please describe the courtship and marriage of Norman Seaver and Sarah Read in 1755 in Sudbury, Massachusetts based on the attached sketch."

2)  The AI tool responded with this story (historical fiction, but the way it might have been): 


Norman Seaver and Sarah Read

A Courtship in Colonial Sudbury

Early Winter, 1754

Norman Seaver was twenty years old in December of 1754, and he had a problem. He had fallen in love with Sarah Read, the daughter of Isaac and Experience Read of Sudbury, but time was not on his side.

He had likely known Sarah for some time—Sudbury was a close-knit community where families attended the same meetinghouse, gathered for work parties, and saw each other at militia trainings and town meetings. Sarah, probably around eighteen or nineteen years old, came from a respectable family. Her father Isaac Read was established in the community, and her mother Experience had raised their children with the strict moral standards expected of proper New England families.

Norman had returned to Sudbury two years earlier, after his father Robert’s death, bringing his mother Eunice and his younger siblings back with him. He had spent time as a young man at Narragansett No. 2 working for the proprietors, gaining valuable experience in frontier life and carpentry. Now, as the oldest living son, Norman was the man of the house. He was working as a husbandman—farming and doing carpentry work to support not only himself but also his mother and family. He was the kind of young man parents appreciated: hardworking, skilled with his hands, from a known family, and with enough ambition and sense of responsibility to care for his widowed mother and siblings.

But Norman's problem was this: Sarah was expecting their child.

In 18th-century New England, premarital pregnancy was not uncommon—studies suggest that perhaps one in three first children were conceived before marriage. Often couples considered themselves informally engaged or "pre-contracted" and began their intimate relationship before the formal church wedding. The community generally tolerated this as long as the couple married before the child was born, though the church might require a public confession or fine.

Whatever the circumstances of their courtship, by late winter 1754, Norman and Sarah knew they needed to marry soon. He would need to approach her father Isaac Read and formally request Sarah's hand—a conversation that may have been uncomfortable given the circumstances, but one that had to happen.

Speaking with Isaac Read

We can imagine Norman approaching the Read household on a cold February or early March day, hat in hand, to speak with Isaac Read. These conversations followed certain forms in colonial New England. A young man needed to demonstrate he could provide for a wife and family. Norman would have explained his circumstances: he had his carpentry skills, he was working steadily, and he had prospects. Perhaps he mentioned the possibility of acquiring land, or his connections that might help him establish himself.

Isaac Read, as a father, would have had concerns. Was this young carpenter stable enough? Could he support Sarah and provide her with a decent home, especially when he was already responsible for his widowed mother and younger siblings? But Isaac also would have been practical. His daughter was pregnant, and Norman was clearly willing to do the honorable thing. Moreover, the Seaver family was known in Sudbury—Robert Seaver had been a respected member of the community before his death. And the fact that Norman had taken on the burden of caring for his mother and siblings showed his character and sense of responsibility.

Sarah's mother Experience would have had her own opinions. She would have wanted to know that her daughter would be treated well, that Norman understood the responsibility he was taking on. But she also would have seen something in the young man—perhaps his earnestness, his work ethic, or simply the way he looked at Sarah.

Whatever was said in that conversation, Isaac Read gave his consent. Norman and Sarah would marry.

March 14, 1755: The Wedding

On March 14, 1755, Norman Seaver and Sarah Read were married in Sudbury. The marriage record, preserved in both the Sudbury and Wayland town records, reads: "Norman Sever & Sarah Read both of Sudbury were Married at Sudbury March 14th 1755 ?? Israel Loring."

Israel Loring was likely the justice of the peace who officiated. In colonial Massachusetts, marriages could be performed by ministers or by civil magistrates. Given the circumstances, Norman and Sarah may have opted for a civil ceremony—simpler, quieter, and requiring less public attention than a full church wedding.

The wedding itself would have been modest. Colonial New England weddings were not the elaborate affairs of later centuries. There would have been witnesses—family members certainly, perhaps a few close friends. Sarah might have worn her best dress, perhaps in a muted color suitable for everyday wear afterward. Norman would have worn his good coat and breeches, cleaned and brushed for the occasion.

The ceremony would have been brief. Israel Loring would have asked the required questions: Did Norman take Sarah to be his lawful wedded wife? Did Sarah take Norman to be her lawful wedded husband? They would have exchanged their promises before witnesses. And then it was done. Norman Seaver, age twenty, and Sarah Read, probably eighteen or nineteen, were husband and wife.

There may have been a simple wedding dinner at the Read home—bread, cheese, perhaps a roasted fowl, cider or beer. Family members would have offered their congratulations and blessings. Experience Read, Sarah’s mother, might have pulled her daughter aside for some final words of advice and encouragement. Norman’s mother Eunice would have been there, along with his younger siblings. Eunice, now a widow, would have welcomed Sarah warmly, grateful that her eldest son had found a good woman to share his life. Norman’s siblings who still lived in the Seaver home – sister Hannah, brothers Robert, Moses, Samuel and John—would have welcomed Sarah into the Seaver family.

Setting Up House

After the wedding, Norman and Sarah had to establish their household. Given Norman’s responsibilities as the man of the house caring for his widowed mother and younger siblings, it seems most likely that Norman and Sarah resided with his mother Eunice and the rest of the Seaver family. This was common practice in colonial New England, especially for a young couple just starting out. The household would have been crowded but workable—Norman’s carpentry skills would have been useful in making whatever improvements were needed to accommodate the newlyweds.

Sarah would have brought to the marriage whatever items formed her dowry—linens she had woven, perhaps some cooking pots and utensils, maybe a chest or trunk. These would have been added to the Seaver household, where she would now be living alongside Norman’s mother Eunice and his younger siblings. For Sarah, this meant learning to navigate a new family dynamic—she was now a daughter-in-law as well as a wife, and would be sharing household duties and space with her mother-in-law. But Eunice, having raised many children herself, would have understood what Sarah was going through and likely offered guidance and support.

As March turned to April and then May, Sarah's pregnancy would have become increasingly obvious. In the small community of Sudbury, people would have counted on their fingers and known that the baby had been conceived before the wedding. There may have been whispers, sideways glances, perhaps some disapproval from the more censorious neighbors. But Sarah and Norman had done the right thing by marrying, and life moved forward.

Sarah would have been preparing for the birth—gathering baby linens, making small clothes, preparing cloths and other necessities. Her mother Experience would have been helping her, sharing knowledge about childbirth and infant care that had been passed down through generations of women. Norman’s mother Eunice, living in the same household, would have been another source of wisdom and support. As a woman who had borne many children herself, Eunice could offer practical advice and reassurance. Norman would have been working steadily, trying to provide for his growing household—his wife, his mother, his siblings, and soon, his first child.

May 3, 1755: Eunice Arrives

On May 3, 1755—less than two months after Norman and Sarah’s wedding—their first child was born. (They named her Eunice, after Norman’s mother, Eunice (Rayment) Seaver. This was a significant gesture. By naming their daughter after her paternal grandmother, Norman and Sarah honored the woman who had welcomed Sarah into the household and who would help raise this baby. For the elder Eunice, having a granddaughter bear her name must have been deeply touching—a promise that her legacy would continue.

The birth would have taken place at home, as all births did in that era. Sarah would have been attended by a midwife—perhaps an experienced older woman from the community, possibly a relative. Her mother Experience would almost certainly have been there, supporting her daughter through the ordeal. And Norman’s mother Eunice, already living in the household, would have been present as well—both as support for Sarah and as the baby’s grandmother waiting to meet her namesake. Norman would have been nearby, probably in another room with his younger siblings, waiting anxiously. Men did not attend births, but they waited and worried.

Childbirth in the 18th century was dangerous. Women died in childbirth with sobering regularity, and infant mortality was high. Sarah would have known this, would have heard stories of women who didn't survive, babies who were stillborn or died within days. So when baby Eunice arrived, healthy and crying lustily, there must have been profound relief along with the joy.

When Norman was finally allowed to enter and see his wife and daughter, he would have been overwhelmed. Here was Sarah, exhausted but alive and well. And here was Eunice, tiny and perfect, his daughter. He was a father now, with all the responsibility and terror and wonder that entailed.

A New Family

The weeks after Eunice’s birth would have been a time of adjustment. Sarah, recovering from childbirth, would have spent most of her time resting and nursing the baby. Experience Read would have visited to help her daughter, but the person most able to assist Sarah day-to-day was Norman’s mother Eunice, who lived right there in the household. The elder Eunice, experienced with many births and babies, would have been invaluable—helping with cooking, cleaning, and laundry, offering advice on infant care, and allowing Sarah to focus on healing and caring for her namesake granddaughter.

Norman would have been working to provide for his household—his wife, his newborn daughter, his mother, and his younger siblings—but he would have also been experiencing those first sleepless nights that new fathers have endured throughout history. The baby’s cries, the need for help, the constant vigilance required to keep an infant alive—all of this was new and sometimes overwhelming. But having his mother in the household was a blessing; her experience and calm presence helped steady the young couple through those exhausting early weeks.

But there would have been moments of pure joy too. Holding Eunice as she slept. Watching Sarah nurse their daughter. Seeing the baby's eyes begin to focus, her first smiles, the way she would grip Norman's finger with surprising strength. These were the moments that made everything worthwhile.

The birth record in Sudbury notes simply: "Eunice, born May 3, 1755." Those few words capture nothing of the drama, fear, hope, and love that surrounded her arrival. But they mark the beginning of Norman and Sarah's journey as parents—a journey that would continue for thirty-two more years and encompass twelve more children.

The Years Ahead

Whatever uncertainty may have surrounded Norman and Sarah's courtship and hasty marriage, they were committed to each other now. They had married, established a household, and welcomed their first child. Eunice's birth in May 1755 was just the beginning of their remarkable partnership.

Over the next twenty-five years, Sarah would bear twelve more children. She and Norman would move from Sudbury to Shrewsbury and finally to Westminster, always seeking better opportunities. They would build farms, raise a large family, and weather the storms of the Revolutionary War. Norman would rise from sergeant to lieutenant, and his sons would follow him into military service.

But all of that was still ahead of them in the spring of 1755. For now, they were simply Norman and Sarah Seaver, young parents trying to figure out how to care for baby Eunice, make ends meet, and build a life together. They had started their marriage under less than ideal circumstances, but they would make it work. And they did—for thirty-two years, until Norman's death in 1787.

Sarah, holding Eunice in their modest Sudbury home in May 1755, could not have imagined all that lay ahead. She couldn't have known she would eventually be the mother of thirteen children, that she would follow her husband through three different towns, that she would endure his long absences during the Revolution, or that she would ultimately outlive him by twenty-one years.

But perhaps, looking at Norman as he gazed at their daughter with such wonder and pride, she knew the most important thing: they would face it all together.

Historical Notes

Documentary Evidence

The marriage record of Norman Seaver and Sarah Read exists in both Sudbury and Wayland town records, dated March 14, 1755. The birth record of Eunice Seaver is recorded in Sudbury, dated May 3, 1755. The short interval between the marriage and the birth—less than two months—suggests that Sarah was approximately seven months pregnant at the time of the wedding.

Premarital Pregnancy in Colonial New England

Historical research has shown that premarital pregnancy was relatively common in colonial New England, particularly by the mid-18th century. Studies of church and vital records suggest that between 30-40% of first children were conceived before marriage by the 1750s. The practice of "bundling"—where courting couples would lie together in bed, supposedly separated by a bundling board or with the woman in a bundling bag—was widespread and often led to pregnancy.

Colonial communities generally tolerated premarital pregnancy as long as the couple married before the birth. Churches might require confession or impose fines, but civil authorities rarely intervened if marriage occurred. The concept of "pre-contract" or informal engagement was recognized—couples who had promised to marry each other were sometimes seen as having permission to begin their intimate relationship.

Narrative Interpretation

While we have documentary evidence of the marriage date and birth date, the details of Norman and Sarah's courtship, their conversations with Sarah's parents, the wedding itself, and the immediate aftermath are based on historical context and typical practices of the era. The emotions, thoughts, and specific interactions described in this narrative are reasonably imagined based on what we know about 18th-century New England courtship and family life, but they are not documented in surviving records.

What we know for certain is that Norman and Sarah married on March 14, 1755, that their first child Eunice was born on May 3, 1755, and that they remained together until Norman's death in 1787, producing thirteen children and building a life together through some of the most turbulent years in American history.

==============================

3)  Here is the Video Overview of this post by Google NotebookLM. 

4)  This is historical fiction based only on the facts that are available (marriage of Norman and Sarah), and the birth of their first child, Eunice Seaver).  It is historical fiction based on social history and society norms at the time and place, so it is likely fairly realistic. It might have happened this way.

==============================================

Links to my blog posts about using Artificial Intelligence are on my Randy's AI and Genealogy page.  Links to AI information and articles about Artificial Intelligence in Genealogy by other genealogists are on my AI and Genealogy Compendium page.

Copyright (c) 2026, Randall J. Seaver


Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on Twitter, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.  Note that all comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately.

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com. 

Friday, March 6, 2026

Added and Updated FamilySearch Record Collections - Week of 28 February to 6 March 2026

 Each week, I try to keep track of the number of Full-Text Search collections (indexed, searchable) and the Images collections (browsable but not searchable) -- see Sections 1) and 2) below. In addition, I list the genealogy historical record collections (often name-indexed) that are added, removed, and/or updated on FamilySearch and listed on the Historical Record Collection list  --  See Section 3.

1)  As of 26 March 2026, there are now 6,665 searchable and full-text transcribed image collections on FamilySearch Full-Text Search this week, a decrease o15 from last week. There are over 1.914 BILLION "results" in the collections.  It is not possible to see which collections are new.  

2)  As of 6 March 2026, there are now 24,604 browsable (some indexed, none transcribed) image collections on FamilySearch Images this week, an increase of 4 from last week. There are over 5.938 BILLION images in these collections.  There are 2,100 collections from the United States, 6,901 from Europe and 221 from Canada.  It is not possible to see which collections are new.  

3)  As of 6 March 2026, there are 3,433 Historical Record Collections (many indexed, browsable) on FamilySearch (an increase of 2 from last week) on the Signed In screen (and 3,433 on the Signed Out screen). 


The Deleted and Added collections this week are:

--- Collections Deleted ---
--- Collections Added ---
There were no collections Updated this week, but many collections had records and/or images removed or added.

===================================

My friend and SDGS colleague, Marshall, has come up with a way to determine which collections are ADDED, DELETED or UPDATED, and to alphabetize the entries in each category. Thanks to Marshall for helping me out here!

Marshall notes that there are:

  • 3,430 Historical Record Collection entries
  • 11 removed entries
  • 10  added entries 
  • 0 updated entries
  • 120 entries with more or fewer images 
  • 534 entries with more or fewer records
Marshsll's list shows 3,430 Historical Record Collections this week, a decrease of 1 collection. The image above shows 3,433 Collections, so the Image is not in sync with Marshall's list for some reason.

==========================================

See previous FamilySearch-related blog posts in        https://www.geneamusings.com/search/label/FamilySearch

Copyright (c) 2026, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post. Share it on X, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below. Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.  Note that all comments are moderated, so they may not be posted immediately.

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com.

Randy (Not) at RootsTech 2026 - Day 2 (Friday, 6 March) Activities

 The second day of the  2026 Conference was live in Salt Lake City, Utah with thousands of persons in attendance, and thousands more watching some of the conference classes online for free.  I choose to be an online viewer rather than an in-person attendee due to my physical restrictions.

Over the past week, I selected online classes for "My Schedule" and have downloaded syllabus articles and slide decks for many of the online and in-person classes.   You can see the current list of RootsTech 2026 online and in-person speakers and presentation titles in https://www.familysearch.org/en/rootstech/schedule/preview.

My activities today were sandwiched around my visit to my wife in the memory care facility and grocery shopping, but I was able to watch some of the classes on my class schedule.   Here are the classes that I watched, either partially or completely:

Often our misconceptions can lead us astray. In DNA analysis, sometimes we fall into surname traps, wrong assumptions, and confirmation bias. Learn how to recognize your misconceptions and address them.
In this session, we show how FamilySearch applies generative AI to read historical handwriting and produce complete transcripts of billions of pages of historical manuscripts in a variety languages and scripts. We describe how FamilySearch identifies names, dates, and places in the text distilled from these documents. We then demonstrate techniques for searching the resulting full text by keyword, name, date, and place. We show how to leverage filter and search features in tandem so that you can readily find the records that reveal your ancestors and tell their stories.
The MyHeritage overview talk by Aaron Godfrey included descriptions of Scribe AI, Country Coded Family Tree, GAIA Genealogy AI Assistant, Family Infographic, Whole Genome DNA Testing/Analysis, and  DNA Traits. No real information was provided for GAIA and the Infographic although they can be imagined. 

Industry innovators gather to reveal the latest developments created to simplify your family discovery experience.

The speakers and topics were:

  • Brian Shirts – ConnectMyVariant – cancer genetics, encouraging family to research genetic issues.
  • Richard K. Miller – Goldie May – Genealogy research assistant.
  • Laryn Brown – Storied – NewspaperArchive revision.
  • John Crockett – Ancestry.com – new features -- AI Stories,, Photo insights, Guided Discoveries, Document Transcription, Full-Text Search.
  • Dave Vance – Family Tree DNA – new Family Finder test (400x current); new BigY Haplogroups.
  • Marisa J. W. Humphrey – LifeWeaver.ai – Tell your family story
  • Alon Eherenfeld – MyHeritage.com – Scribe AI.

 This session invites you to connect with your ancestors on a personal level, exploring the context of their lives and digging deeper than a basic genealogical collection of vital events. The presenters (a BYU genealogy professor and BYU genealogy students) will share tactics and fun examples.

Wondering where to begin with AI in genealogy? Foundations & First Steps provides a clear, actionable introduction to using large-language models effectively. Join Steve Little, founder of AI Genealogy Insights, to learn how AI can streamline your workflow through practical templates for summarizing research, extracting key details, transforming how writing looks and sounds, and generating polished family narratives. You’ll see step-by-step demonstrations and leave with essential resources—ready-to-use prompts, transcription scripts, a model-comparison toolkit, and an ethics checklist—to integrate AI into your genealogical work responsibly and confidently. Come curious; leave empowered!
Cornelia Ingersoll was born about 1788 in Carmel, Dutchess (later Westchester) County, New York. Cornelia’s life after her marriage to Henry Stogdill was well documented. However, extensive documentary research in the Carmel area failed to reveal her parents’ names. Autosomal DNA analysis left little doubt that Cornelia was the granddaughter of Josiah Ingersoll, Sr. However, Josiah fathered multiple children with two different wives. This session will illustrate how multiple test takers, DNA networks, half relationships, and maternal surnames were combined with documentary evidence to pinpoint the most likely parents for Cornelia.
Genealogists must transform complex research into clear and convincing conclusions. This session will focus on writing proof arguments that meet the Genealogical Proof Standard (GPS), highlighting how to select and organize the strongest evidence. Additionally, we will also review ways to address conflicting and indirect evidence using correlation tools such as timelines and tables. The importance of incorporating social and historical context will also be discussed. Whether you are writing for yourself or your clients, this session will provide you with the tools to write with clarity, confidence, and credibility.

Lastly, I checked the Relatives at RootsTech page and saw that I have 48,545 relatives listed at RootsTech 2026 (down from over 74,000 in 2025).



My closest Relative at RootsTech is a first cousin 1x removed whom I know in my Seaver line, and the next closest cousin is George, a 3rd cousin 1x removed in my Kemp line.  I am randyseaver1 if you want to see how I am related to you.  

=============================================

Disclosure:  I am a RootsTech 2026 "Influencer" but will receive no remuneration for my support or posting of RootsTech information.  I will be an online participant this year because of my health issues.

The URL for this post is:  

Copyright (c) 2026, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post. Share it on Twitter, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below. Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.    I moderate all comments and they may not appear immediately - please write only one comment.

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com.

Added and Updated Ancestry.com Record Collections - Week of 28 February to 6 March 2026

 The following genealogy record collections were added to the Ancestry.com Card Catalog page by "Date Updated" during the period from 28 February to 6 March 2026:

The ADDED and Updated collections include:

  • U.S., Family History Books; 255,789,675 indexed records with record images; Updated 3/5/2026. This collection contains over 64,000 family history books of families living in the United States. Some books may include information about ancestors who were born in other countries.
  • Quebec, Canada, Notarial Records, 1637-1935; 16,529,462 indexed records with record images; Updated 3/4/2026. Notarial records are private agreements (contracts), written by official notaries. This collection consists of notarial records for Quebec from the years 1637 to 1935.
  • Quebec, Canada, Vital and Church Records (Drouin Collection), 1621-1968; 41,012,598 indexed records with record images, Updated 3/4/2026. This collection holds over thirty million records pertaining to births, baptisms, marriages, deaths, and burials in Quebec between roughly 1621 and 1968. 
  • Jalisco, Mexico, Catholic Church Records, 1590-1995; 15,493,931 indexed records with record images; Updated 3/4/2026. This collection contains catholic parish records created by the state of Jalisco in Mexico.
  • England & Wales, Prerogative Court of Canterbury Wills, 1384-1858; 1,012,964 indexed records with record images; Updated 3/4/2026. Prior to 12 January 1858, wills in England and Wales were proved in ecclesiastical courts. The largest one was the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, 1384–1858.
  • Virginia, U.S., Wills and Probate Records, 1652-1900; 1,383,805 indexed records with record images; Updated 3/4/2026. You can’t take it with you. Find out what was left behind and to whom in 200 years of Virginia probate records.
  • UK, Wartime Records and Material, 1914-1918, 1939-1945; 30,182 indexed records with record images; Updated 3/3/2026. This collection contains military and wartime images from The Imperial War Museums, from 1914 to 1918 and 1939 to 1945. The majority of the images are photographs.
  • Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, U.S., Female Sole Trader Ledgers, 1875-1906; 4,798 indexed records with record images; ADDED 3/2/2026. This collection contains records from Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, dated between 1875 and 1906 related to women seeking the right to conduct business independently or own property separately.
  • Arkansas, U.S., County Sheriff Census, 1829; 2,635 indexed records with record images;   ADDED 3/2/2026. This collection contains census returns from counties in Arkansas from 1829. Full returns are available for Arkansas, Chicot, Clark, Conway, Crawford, Crittenden, Independence, Lawrence, and more
  • Shropshire, England, Electoral Registers and Poll Books, 1676-1954; 6,852,775 indexed records with record images, ADDED 3/2/2026. This collection contains electoral registers and poll books from Shropshire, England, dated between 1676 and 1954. Electoral registers in this collection were produced between 1832 and 1954.

=========================================

The complete Ancestry.com Card Catalog is at https://search.ancestry.com/search/CardCatalog.aspx.  

By my count, there are 3 NEW record collections ADDED this past week, per the list above.  There are now 33,896 collections available as of 6 March 2026, an INCREASE of 3 from last week. 

                              ==============================================

Disclosure: I pay for an All-Access subscription from Ancestry.com. In past years, Ancestry.com  provided a complimentary All Access subscription, an autosomal DNA test, material considerations for travel expenses to meetings, and hosted events and meals that I attended in Salt Lake City.

The URL for this post is:  https://www.geneamusings.com/2026/03/added-and-updated-ancestrycom-record.html

Copyright (c) 2026, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post. Share it on Twitter, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below. Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com. Please note that all Comments are moderated so they may not appear immediately.

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com 

Ask AI: "Describe Joseph Champlin's Revolutionary War Military Service"

The Artificial Intelligence tools (like ChatGPT, Claude, CoPilot, Gemini, Grok, Meta, Grok, and Perplexity) can provide much useful and nearly instant information about subjects in a concise format, especially when they have been pre-trained on a large volume of information about the subjects.

I wondered if the FREE AI tools could provide me with information about the events in the Revolutionary War experienced by my 4th great-grandfather, Joseph Champlin (1757-1850) of Rhode Island.

  My genealogical sketch for Joseph Champlin is 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks - Week 79: #94 Joseph Champlin (1757-1850), which included a summary of his military service and his pension file, was attached to the prompt.

(AI NotebookLM Infographic of Joseph Champlin's service)

1)  My Prompt to free Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5 was:  "Please describe Joseph Champlin's (1757-1850) Revolutionary War military service in chronological order based on the attached document."

2)  The AI tool responded with:


Joseph Champlin's Military Service During the Revolutionary War

Overview

Joseph Champlin served five separate tours of duty during the American Revolutionary War, spanning from 1775 to 1780. His service included both militia companies and the Continental Army, during critical periods of Rhode Island's involvement in the conflict.


First Enlistment: 1775

Unit: Captain Samuel Segar's Company (Rhode Island Militia)
Duration: 1 month
Period: 1775 (likely summer/fall, possibly listed as 1774 in pension records)

Historical Context

In April 1775, after the Battles of Lexington and Concord, Rhode Island responded immediately. The General Assembly voted to raise an "Army of Observation" of 1,500 men to "repel any insult or violence" and join forces with other colonies if necessary. This was part of Rhode Island's initial mobilization.

Unit Activities

Captain Segar's company would have been part of the initial Rhode Island militia mobilization. During 1775, Rhode Island militia units were:

  • Training and organizing along military lines

  • Responding to threats from British naval vessels, particularly Captain James Wallace's HMS Rose, which terrorized Narragansett Bay

  • Guarding coastal areas and strategic points

  • Preparing defenses around Providence and other key locations

  • Some units marched to support the siege of Boston

The first year of war saw Rhode Island militia primarily engaged in defensive preparations and responding to British naval raids along the coast.


Second Enlistment: 1776

Unit: Captain Samuel Potter's Militia Company (2nd Kings County Regiment)
Duration: 2 months
Period: 1776

Historical Context

1776 was a critical year when the British threat to Rhode Island intensified. In December 1776, the British would occupy Newport, but throughout the year, Rhode Island forces were preparing for this eventuality.

Unit Activities

Captain Samuel Potter commanded the 1st South Kingstown Company in the 2nd Kings County Regiment. During 1776, this unit would have been involved in:

  • Coastal defense and guard duties in Washington County (Kings County)

  • Responding to British naval raids and threats

  • Protecting supplies and strategic locations

  • Drilling and training as tensions increased

Rhode Island was particularly vulnerable due to its 400+ miles of coastline, and militia companies like Potter's were essential for local defense.


Third Enlistment: 1777

Unit: Captain Samuel Potter's Company
Duration: 5 months
Period: 1777

Historical Context

This was Joseph's longest militia service. By this time, the British had occupied Newport (December 1776) and controlled Aquidneck Island. The state was essentially in a state of siege, with British forces holding the most important port.

Unit Activities

Captain Potter's company had documented activities in 1777:

November 6, 1777 - Capture of HMS Syren: One of the most significant actions involving Potter's company occurred when the British frigate HMS Syren (28 guns) ran aground near Whale Rock on the Narragansett shoreline during rough weather. Potter's company, along with other militia units, brought up three artillery pieces and fired accurate shots at the stranded vessel. The British captain surrendered, and the Americans captured 136 British sailors and marines—a major coup that provided valuable prisoners for exchange.

Throughout 1777, Potter's unit was likely involved in:

  • Coastal patrol and surveillance of British positions

  • Guard duty at strategic points along the shore

  • Responding to British foraging parties and raids

  • Protecting livestock and supplies from British seizure

  • Supporting Continental Army operations when possible

This was a period of constant vigilance, as the British occupied Newport and made regular raids on the mainland to seize supplies.


Fourth Enlistment: 1778

Unit: Captain Timothy Locke's Company, Colonel Charles Dyer's Regiment
Commander: General John Sullivan
Duration: 1 month
Period: August 1778

The Battle of Rhode Island Campaign

This was Joseph's most significant military action. In August 1778, American forces under General John Sullivan, supported by a French fleet under Admiral d'Estaing, launched a major operation to retake Newport from British occupation.

Campaign Timeline

August 9, 1778 - Howland's Ferry Crossing: Joseph's unit was part of approximately 11,000 Continental and militia troops who crossed from Tiverton to Aquidneck Island at Howland's Ferry (also called Howland Ferry Bridge in the pension records). This was the main American landing point for the invasion. The crossing was unopposed, as the British under General Robert Pigot had withdrawn to fortified positions around Newport.

August 9-28, 1778 - Siege Operations: For nearly three weeks, American forces besieged the British garrison in Newport. Sullivan's forces dug in on Honeyman's Hill in Middletown. However, the operation was hampered when:

  • A storm on August 10-11 damaged both the French and British fleets

  • Admiral d'Estaing sailed to Boston for repairs, taking the French troops with him

  • Thousands of militia deserted when the French left

  • British reinforcements were reported to be on their way from New York

August 29, 1778 - Battle of Rhode Island (Battle of Quaker Hill): When Sullivan decided to withdraw from the island on August 28, the British garrison sortied from Newport to attack the retreating Americans. The fighting on August 29 was fierce:

  • American forces established defensive positions across the northern part of Aquidneck Island

  • The defensive line stretched from Turkey Hill on the west to Quaker Hill on the east

  • British and Hessian forces launched repeated assaults trying to break through

  • The famous 1st Rhode Island Regiment (the "Black Regiment" of African American soldiers under Colonel Christopher Greene) distinguished itself by repulsing three Hessian charges

  • The battle lasted throughout the day with heavy casualties on both sides

  • American casualties: approximately 30 killed, 173 wounded, 44 missing

  • British/Hessian casualties: approximately 38 killed, 210 wounded, 12 missing

Howland's Ferry in the Battle: The ferry crossing point was critical during the retreat. Sullivan had to maintain defensive positions to protect the withdrawal route back across Howland's Ferry to the mainland. The successful defense allowed the American army to withdraw "in perfect order and safety, not leaving behind the smallest article of provision, camp equipage, or military stores."

August 30-31, 1778 - Successful Withdrawal: By midnight on August 30, the last Continental troops were safely removed from Aquidneck Island. The operation was considered a tactical success despite failing to retake Newport, as Sullivan's army preserved itself intact and inflicted heavy casualties on the British.

Joseph's Role

As a private in Captain Timothy Locke's company, Joseph would have:

  • Crossed at Howland's Ferry on August 9

  • Participated in the siege operations for three weeks

  • Been in the defensive line during the Battle of Rhode Island on August 29

  • Helped cover the withdrawal back across Howland's Ferry

This was the largest battle of the Revolutionary War fought in New England, and it was the first major Franco-American combined operation of the war.


Fifth Enlistment: 1780

Unit: Captain Daniel Dexter's Company, Colonel Christopher Greene's Continental Regiment
Duration: 6 months
Period: 1780

Historical Context

This was Joseph's transition from militia to Continental Army service—his longest and most demanding enlistment. By 1780, the war had been going on for five years, and the Continental Army was struggling with manpower shortages, lack of pay, and supply problems.

Colonel Christopher Greene's Regiment (1st Rhode Island Regiment)

This was one of the most remarkable units in the Continental Army. Originally formed in 1777, it was reorganized in early 1778 to include enslaved and free African Americans who were promised freedom in exchange for service. By 1780, it was an integrated unit with both Black and white soldiers.

Key Facts about the Regiment:

  • Colonel Christopher Greene commanded until his death in May 1781

  • The regiment had distinguished itself at the Battle of Red Bank (Fort Mercer) in October 1777

  • It fought with great distinction at the Battle of Rhode Island in August 1778

  • It was considered one of the most disciplined and effective units in the Continental Army

  • Lieutenant Colonel Jeremiah Olney was second-in-command

  • Major Samuel Ward (who had commanded at Red Bank when Greene was wounded) was also a key officer

1780 Service Activities

During Joseph's six months of Continental Army service in 1780, the regiment was likely engaged in:

Garrison and Guard Duty: After the British evacuated Newport in October 1779, Rhode Island Continental forces were deployed in defensive positions:

  • Manning redoubts and fortifications along the Rhode Island coast

  • Guard duty at strategic locations like East Greenwich, Quidnessett Neck, and North Kingstown

  • Maintaining disciplined training and readiness

  • Protecting against British raids from New York

Life as a Continental Soldier: Unlike militia service, Continental Army soldiers:

  • Were subject to strict military discipline and regular drill

  • Followed Baron von Steuben's training methods (the regiment trained at Valley Forge in 1777-78)

  • Received (when available) standard Continental Army uniforms and equipment

  • Were expected to maintain military standards of conduct and appearance

  • Lived in military camps under camp regulations

  • Performed regular guard duty, fatigue duty, and training exercises

Challenges of 1780: By 1780, the Continental Army faced severe challenges:

  • Chronic shortage of pay (some soldiers hadn't been paid in months)

  • Limited supplies of food, clothing, and ammunition

  • War weariness after five years of fighting

  • Desertions were a constant problem

  • The main theater of war had shifted to the South

Despite these hardships, Greene's regiment maintained its reputation for discipline and effectiveness. The soldiers knew they were part of an elite unit that had proven itself in battle.

Daily Life: Joseph would have experienced:

  • Reveille at dawn

  • Morning roll call and inspection

  • Drill and training exercises

  • Guard mount ceremonies

  • Fatigue duties (building/repairing fortifications, cutting wood, etc.)

  • Guard duty rotations (typically 24-hour shifts)

  • Evening roll call

  • Tattoo (lights out signal)

The six months would have tested Joseph's endurance and commitment, but it also meant he was part of the professional Continental Army—the force that would ultimately win American independence.


Summary of Joseph's Service

Total Time Served: Approximately 15 months over five separate enlistments (1775-1780)

Types of Service:

  • Militia service: 8 months (1775-1778)

  • Continental Army service: 6 months (1780)

  • State service: 1 month (1778, Battle of Rhode Island)

Combat Experience:

  • Captured British frigate HMS Syren (November 1777)

  • Battle of Rhode Island/Howland's Ferry (August 1778) - largest battle in New England during the war

  • Various skirmishes and coastal defense actions

Units Served:

  • Three different Rhode Island militia companies

  • One Continental Army regiment (one of the most distinguished in the army)

Notable Aspects:

  • Served under both militia and Continental command structures

  • Experienced both defensive operations and major offensive campaigns

  • Survived shipwreck (date uncertain, possibly during one of these enlistments)

  • Witnessed the first major Franco-American military cooperation

  • Served in an integrated Continental regiment alongside African American soldiers

  • Fought at a critical defensive battle that preserved an American army

Joseph's service record shows a man who answered his country's call repeatedly over five years, serving in both local defense and the Continental line. His experience at the Battle of Rhode Island placed him at one of the most significant engagements of the war, and his Continental service in Greene's regiment connected him to one of the army's most elite and historically important units.

The variety of his service—from one-month militia stints responding to local emergencies to six months of hard Continental service—reflects the typical experience of many Revolutionary War soldiers, who moved between militia and Continental service as needed. His willingness to serve five separate times demonstrates uncommon dedication to the Revolutionary cause.

4)  Here is the Video Overview of this post by Google NotebookLM. 

5)  I have no doubt that the battle descriptions are correct - history books have been written about the battles and the AI tools were pre-trained on the history books This particular post is an excellent example of asking the AI tool to summarize the submitted information from a number of sources and put my Revolutionary War soldier in the middle of the historical narrative.

==============================================

Links to my blog posts about using Artificial Intelligence are on my Randy's AI and Genealogy page.  Links to AI information and articles about Artificial Intelligence in Genealogy by other genealogists are on my AI and Genealogy Compendium page.

Copyright (c) 2026, Randall J. Seaver


Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on Twitter, Facebook, or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.  Note that all comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately.

Subscribe to receive a free daily email from Genea-Musings using www.Blogtrottr.com.