Tuesday, March 12, 2013

My 23andMe Test Results - Post 2: Chromosome Views UPDATED!

I received my 23andMe.com genetic test results last week, and described the results in "macro" terms in My 23andMe DNA Test Results - Post 1:  Ancestry Composition (5 March 2013).

I've been checking out everything in the autosomal test results pages, and have discovered several features that are very useful and interesting.  I've started speculating how some of the more confusing DNA segments got into my autosomal DNA results.

What I know about my ancestral families, based on my 64 4th great-grandparents, is:

A)  Father's ancestry:

*  Colonial Massachusetts: 24 of 32, all of English ancestry in the 1600s (no known Irish or Scottish)
*  England: 8 of 32, all in Wiltshire in the 1600s, 1700s, and early 1800s

B)  Mother's ancestry:

*  Colonial US English: 13 of 32, in the US in the 1700s, of English ancestry in the 1600s (perhaps 1 known Scots-Irish)
*  Colonial US German: 15 of 32, in the US in the 1700s, of German ancestry in the 1600s (1 known Dutch)
*  Colonial Canada: 2 of 32, of unknown ancestry in the 1700s (perhaps French)
*  England: 2 of 32, all in Somerset in the 1600s, 1700s and early 1800s

The Ancestry Composition page says:

"Ancestry Composition tells you what percent of your DNA comes from each of 22 populations worldwide. The analysis includes DNA you received from all of your ancestors, on both sides of your family. The results reflect where your ancestors lived 500 years ago, before ocean-crossing ships and airplanes came on the scene."

Here is my Ancestry Composition chart (with the Standard Estimate.  There is also a Conservative Estimate and a Speculative Estimate available):



As you can see, I'm 99.3% European, and 0.6% East Asian and Native American. In the chart above, there are 23 sets of lines - one for each chromosome.  For chromosomes 1 to 22, my mother's contribution is above my father's contribution.  The X chromosome is my mother's, since I am a male person.

UPDATED:  1:30 p.m.:  Blaine Bettinger on Facebook and Brian in comments told me that my "assumption" that the top line is my mother's and the bottom line is my father's is wrong...thank you, guys!  Brian noted that the FAQ for Ancestry Composition says:  "Genotyping chips like the one 23andMe uses don't capture the information about which markers came from which parent." That changes things further down!

The above chart is somewhat difficult to sort out, at least for the European sub-groups. However, I found that by running my mouse over the list on the right for each reference population, I could see the segments on the chromosomes contributed from that population.  For instance, I ran my mouse over the Northern European portion and the chart highlighted the segments on the chromosomes that were from Northern Europe:


Here are the British and Irish segments on the chromosomes:


The French and German segments are in the next chart below:


The Scandinavian segments are shown below:


The Southern European segments are:


The East Asian and Native American segments are below:


I've also looked at the "Speculative Estimate" which assigns higher percentages to some of the Northern European ancestry.

I have several surprise in these charts, including (I'm going to leave these here in spite of my assumption error noted in the update...take them with a grain of salt!):

1)  My father has a large segment of German and French DNA on Chromosome 1, and smaller segments on Chromosomes 1 and 17.  I have no clue where that comes from; my speculation is that 500 years ago, some French or German folks had migrated to England.  My English ancestry is from all over England, including areas settled by Normans and Saxons and Angles, plus the folks who had lived in England for thousands of years.


2)  My father has a significant segment of Scandinavian DNA on Chromosome 3, and that is the only Scandinavian segment in my tested DNA.  Again, I don't have any known ancestry from Scandinavia on my father's side (I do on my mother's side!).  My speculation is that this may be one or more ancestors descended from Scandinavia who migrated to the British Isles before 1600.


3)  My father has the only segment from Southern Europe on Chromosome 22.  My speculation is that this may be from Iberia or Italy, and may be a vestige from Roman times in England.  


Interestingly, there are more segments for my father's German and French, Scandinavia and Southern Europe in the "Speculative Estimate."


4)  My mother has a segment for East Asian and Native American DNA on Chromosome 12.  I don't know for sure where that comes from.  My speculation is that this may be from the wife of Abraham James Kemp, who is identified in a Bible record transcript as Sarah Sephrona Fletcher, of French-Canadian heritage.  There may be (or may not be!) a Native American ancestor in her ancestry.  I probably have other candidates who might have had a Native American ancestor, since quite a few of my ancestors lived on the English/Native frontier in the mid-1700s.  This is about 1/167th of my DNA, so it probably occurs in the 7th or 8th generation back).  


5)  My mother has a long segment of French and German DNA on Chromosome 2, and shorter segments on Chromosomes 7 and 12.  I am surprised that there is so little identified here because of her known 15 of 32 ancestors from German ancestor.  There are many more segments identifying as French and German in the "Speculative Estimate" chart.


Here is the "Speculative Estimate" chart (you change this in the upper right corner of this web page, next to your name):



My "Speculative Estimate" breakdown for the reference populations are:

*  99.4% European

** 43.0% British and Irish
** 25.2% French and German
** 2.7% Scandinavian
** 0.0% Finnish
** 26.1% Nonspecific Northern European
**  0.4% Iberian
** 0.0% Sardinian
** 0.0% Italian
** 0.0%  Balkan
** 1.2% Nonspecific Southern European
** < 0.1% Ashkenazi
** 0.0% Eastern European
0.7% Nonspecific European

*  0.6% East Asian and Native European

** 0.6% Native American
** 0.0% East Asian
** 0.0% Nonspecific East Asian & Native America

I hope that I can have CeCe Moore analyze my autosomal DNA results at the upcoming Chula Vista Genealogical Society seminar on 30 March 2013.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/03/my-23andme-test-results-post-2.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver

Tuesday's Tip - Find New Hampshire Records at FamilySearch

This week's Tuesday's Tip is:  Find FREE New Hampshire records in FamilySearch record collections.


The New Hampshire record collections (put 'new hampshire" in the search field) include:

*  New Hampshire Birth Records, Early to 1900* (indexed, images)

*  New Hampshire, Births and Christenings, 1714-1904**  (indexed, no images)

*  New Hampshire, County Naturalization Records, 1771-2001 (browse images only)

*  New Hampshire, County Probate Estate Files, 1769-1936 (browse images only)

*  New Hampshire, County Probate Records, 1660-1973 (browse images only)

*  New Hampshire, Death Records, 1654-1947* (indexed, images)

*  New Hampshire, Deaths and Burials, 1784-1949 (indexed, no images)

*  New Hampshire, Hillsborough County, Manchester, Cemetery Records, 1800-2007 (browse images only)

*  New Hampshire, Marriage Records, 1637-1947* (indexed, images)

*  New Hampshire, Marriages, 1720-1920** (indexed, no images)

*  New Hampshire, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1636-1947 (browse images only)

The collections marked with one asterisk (*) are images of file cards submitted by towns to the state with birth, marriage and death records.

The collections marked with two asterisks (**) are the International Genealogical Index entries extracted or submitted by LDS church members over the years.

The New Hampshire Town Clerk collection are the original town records, and transcriptions of them in some cases, which contain vital records in addition to other town business.

The two New Hampshire County probate records collections are the county probate court clerk records, so are record copies of original records.

I can hardly wait for the New Hampshire County Land Records that will be in a browse images category when it becomes available.  I need to "mine" more of the birth, marriage and death collections for the Seaver surname and my New Hampshire ancestral families.

For the "browse images only" collections, the user has to treat the records as "digital microfilm" and page through them a page at a time.  These collections are usually "waypointed" by county and/or town, and then by specific record books (volumes, etc.).

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/03/tuesdays-tip-find-new-hampshire-records.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver

Monday, March 11, 2013

Dear Randy - Two Names, Two Birth Records for One Child? Or Two?

One of the comments on my post Follow-Up Friday - Helpful/Interesting Reader Comments (8 March 2013) was from Dandelion, who said:

"Here’s an interesting case. A baby girl was born March 3, 1861 in Edinburgh Parish, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland. Her father registered her with the name “Mary Milne” (his mother’s name) on March 9, 1861. He then disappeared. Her mother went in on March 22 and registered her with the same birth date and the name “Alison Naismith McIntyre Milne” (her name) Both records were signed by the respective parent and witnessed by the registrar. Seeing the two records I assumed they were twins but wondered why one had been named “Mary” since there already was a child by that name in the family. On the 1861 census, taken about a month later, there was only one baby girl. (The three older children were the children of her deceased husband. The census taker apparently had a hard time dealing with two last names since the two boys were listed as “unknown” although they would have been old enough to know their names.) Another descendant of the family who had seen the divorce records said that he believed that there was only one child, registered twice. The birth records usually state if there were twins. How would one describe the veracity of the two birth records."

That is certainly an interesting research problem, and one that my readers might want to chime in.  Here is my answer:

There are two birth records in the register, and both of them are truthful at the time they were made.  If the father ever saw the child again, he probably would have called her "Mary." (and probably received a quizzical look on his daughter's face!).  The mother called her "Alison Naismith McIntyre Milne" when she registered her, and that was probably the name the mother, and Alison, invariably used throughout her life.  The first one isn't "wrong," it's just "obsolete" in my view, superseded by the mother's registration entry.

Was she called Alison during her lifetime?  Are there any records that call her "Mary" besides the father's register entry?  You probably have a baptismal record, marriage record, a death record, census records, an obituary, a burial record, etc. that have Alison's name.  What about school records, school yearbooks, family Bibles, newspaper articles, work records, court records, letters to or from Alison, etc.?    

What you don't have is any evidence that "Mary" existed apart from "Alison."  There is a finite time period separating the entry of "Mary" and the entry for "Alison" in the register, and you have a logical explanation why there are two birth records.  You just don't know if the explanation is correct!

In the 1861 census, there was no "Mary," at least residing with the mother.  Are there no entries for a Mary Milne in the baptism, death, burial, marriage, or other records?  To do a reasonably exhaustive search, you should look for records pertaining to "Mary." You should obtain the divorce record you mention also.  If you find no evidence at all for the existence of Mary after the birth registration, your conclusion is that "Mary" was a name given by the father to the person "Alison Naismith McIntyre Milne," but it was never used by Alison during her lifetime.   You should write up your conclusion in your research notes for Alison's birth, and note the evidence that you found (and didn't find) to support your conclusion.

What do my readers think of this problem?  

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/03/dear-randy-two-names-two-birth-records.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver

What I Hope to Hear at RootsTech 2013

The start of RootsTech 2013 is only ten days away now, and I'm starting to put together my research list for the Family History Library (using the RootsMagic To-Do list, which I'll copy to a file and put in Dropbox and Evernote for access on my smart phone and tablet) on Wednesday, 20 March.


My plan for each of the days at RootsTech is to attend the Keynote talks, then spend time in the Exhibit Hall and at the Media Center, and squeeze in one or two speaker sessions each day.  I look forward to hanging out at the Media Center with the other Official Bloggers.  Hopefully, I will be able to post pictures and experiences each evening from Salt Lake City.

I got to thinking about the exhibitors, and what "new, shiny goodies" they might have for us to see and discuss (and write about).  Here is my "Hope to Hear" list for some of the exhibitors:

*  Ancestry.com :  Enhanced viewer for many more databases, several large and unique databases are released. FTM 2013 announced, will have improved charts and reports, improved interaction with FamilySearch Family Tree, etc.  Access links to unique collections on Fold3, Archives, etc.  Improved app for iOS, Android and Windows.

*  FamilySearch :  FamilySearch Family Tree open for everyone including photos, and API released to software companies to interface with it.  Revamp of website to make searching easier, especially on record collection page.  App for FamilySearch Family Tree, Research Wiki, Library Catalog and Research Courses.

*  FindMyPast :  More U.S. record collections, more Canadian collections, improved navigation (page-to-page, especially) on the site.  Improved family tree capabilities.  App for family tree and searching collections.

*  MyHeritage:  More U.S. and worldwide record collections.  Integration with Geni (including cross-platform searches). Improved Family Tree Builder software.  Improved app for searching collections and family tree.

*  Legacy Family Tree:  Version 8?  Improved interaction with FamilySearch Family Tree, including sources and images.  Lots of FamilyTreeWebinar.com and Legacy QuickGuide sales.  Free app for iOS and Android to access tree information and webinars.

*  RootsMagic : Version 6.1?  Improved app for iOS and Android, including access to webinars.  Improved interaction with FamilySearch Family Tree, including sources and images.

*  Mocavo :  Additional databases available.  App to search databases and genealogy websites.

*  Geni.com :  GEDCOM upload/download capability from genealogy software.  App for photo upload, world tree access.

*  Evidentia : A coming out party for this genealogy software - it may be the "best new product" of the conference.

There - now I've raised everyone's expectations, haven't I?  I have only one bit of "inside information" and I haven't included it in the list above.  I know also that I am not the most "tuned-in" to new ventures in the genea-blogsphere...

There is no list of exhibitors on the RootsTech website yet - only the list of sponsors.  The Exhibit Hall is supposed to be 40% larger this year, so there may be many more small entrepreneurial companies, even professional genealogists, with exhibits.

What new products do you "hope to hear about" from RootsTech 2013?  Tell me in Comments. Let's see if any of us can predict what will be shown at the conference!

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/03/what-i-hope-to-hear-at-rootstech-2013.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver

Amanuensis Monday - 1853 New York Deed of Heirs of James Vaux to William Bennett

Genea-blogger John Newmark (who writes the excellent TransylvanianDutch blog) started his own Monday blog theme many months ago called Amanuensis Monday. What does "amanuensis" mean? John offers this definition:  

"A person employed to write what another dictates or to copy what has been written by another."  

The subject today is the deed granted by the heirs of James Vaux of Aurora, New York, deceased, to William N. Bennett in Aurora, Erie County, New York (three pages, starts 3/4 down the first page):




Here is my transcription of this entry (handwritten portions in italics) in Erie County, New York, Land Records 1853-1855, Liber 148, Pages 378-380 (accessed in the "New York, Land Records, 1630-1975" collection on https://FamilySearch.org):

Deed  L 31 Aurora

John Taylor and others to William N. Bennett
........................................... This Indenture made the twenty sixth day of October in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Eight hundred and fifty three between John Taylor and Ann his wfie, Samuel Vaux and Mary Ann his wife, George Vaux and Elizabeth his wife, and Ernest Vaux of the town of Chester, dodge county, Wisconsin, John Vaux of Buffalo Erie County New York and Josiah Vaux and Mary Ann his wife of Aurora Erie county New York of the first part and William N. Bennett of Aurora Erie county New York of the second part, Witnesseth that the said party of the first part for and in consideration of the sum of two hundred and twenty five dollars lawful money of the United States of America to them in hand paid by the party of the second part the receipt whereof is hereby confirmed and acknowledged, have granted, bargained, sold, remised. released, aliened and confirm unto the said party of the second part and to his heirs and assigns forever six undivided sixteenths of a certain farm part of Lot 31 of the Holland Company surveys in the town of Aurora County of Erie and State of New York formerly owned by James Vaux senior and bounded as follows.

................................. Commencing at the South East corner of Land owned and occupied by Erasmus Adams, and on the north bounds of Land owned and occupied by the heirs of Geo Bartlett: thence running South 89-1/4 degree East twenty three rods and fifteen links to the centre of highway, thence North 2-1/2 degrees East along the centre of said highway twenty nine rods and three links, thence Westerly parallel to the first mentioned line twenty three rods and fifteen links to said Adams land, thence South 2-1/2 degrees West twenty nine rods and three links to the place of beginning, Containing four acres and forty seven rods be the same more or less.

........................................................Together with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging as in anywise appertaining and the reversion and reversions remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof: and all the Estate, right, title, interest, dower, right of dower, claim or demand, whatsoever, of the said party of the first part either in Law or in Equity of in and to the above bargained premises, with the said hereditaments and appurtenances To Have and To Hold the said premises as above described with the appurtenances unto the said party of the second part and to their heirs and assigns forever.

And the said John, Samuel, George and Ernest, and Josiah and Ann Taylor, for themselves, their heirs, executors, and administrators do covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the said party of the second part his heirs and assigns that at the time of ensealing and delivery of these presents they are well seized of the premises above conveyed as of a good, sure, perfect absolute and indefensible estate of inheritance in the law in fee simple and that the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the said party of the second part, his heirs and assigns against all and every person lawfully claiming as to claim the estate or any part thereof, he will forever Warrant and Defend.
............................................................ In Witness Whereof
the party of the first part have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first above written,
signed sealed executed ............................ } .............John Taylor SS & Ann Taylor SS
&delivered in presence of ....................... } ............ Samuel Vaux SS & Mary A. Vaux SS
R S Graham, S B Hills ............................. } ............ George Vaux SS and Elizabeth Vaux SS
Erie county SS On this 26th day ........... } ............ Ernest Vaux SS & Jno. P. Vaux SS
of Nov^r 1853 before me personally ..... } ............ Josiah Vaux SS & Mary A Vaux SS
appeared John P. Vaux known to me
to be the person who executed the 
within instrument and acknowledged
to me the execution thereof.
......... CJ Shattucke Justice
................ of the Peace 

Erie County SS  On this 28th day of November A D 1853 before me personally appeared Ernest Vaux known to me to be the person who executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me the execution thereof.
.................................................................. James C Paul Justice of the Peace

Erie county SS On this 28th day of November 1853 personally appeared before me Josiah Vaux and Mary A his wife and severally acknowledged that they executed the same without any fear of compulsion of her husband ^[annex ???????? spent and she said make a] in a private conversation separate and apart from her husband acknowledged that she executed the same without any fear or compulsion of her husband and further certify that I know the persons who made the said acknowledgement to be the individuals described in & who executed the annexed instrument.
................................................................. James C Paul J P

State of Wisconsin }
Fond du Lac County } I Leander B. Hills a Commissioner for the State of New York residing in Waupan in the County of Fond du Lac and state of Wisconsin do certify on the 14th day of November in the Year One thousand eight hundred and Fifty three in the Town of Waupun in the County of Fond du Lac aforesaid personally appeared before me John Taylor and Ann his wife Samuel Vaux and Mary A his wife and George Vaux and Elizabeth his wife all of said persons known to me to be the individuals described in and who executed the within deed and they severally acknowledged to me that they had executed the said deed.  And the said Ann wife of the said John Taylor and the said Mary A wife of the said Samuel Vaux and the said Elizabeth wife of the said George Vaux on a private examination by me apart from their said husbands and further acknowledged to me that she executed the said deed freely and without any fear or compulsion of her husband.

In Witness Whereof I have hereunto set my hand and official seal at Waupun in the County and state aforesaid this 14th day of November One thousand Eight hundred and fifty three.
................................................ S B Hills Commissioner for the State of New York

State of New York } SS
Secretary's Office   }  I hereby certify that Leander B. Hills of Waupun County of Fond du Lac and State of Wisconsin was at the time of taking the annexed  acknowledgement, a Commissioner for the state of New York to take the proof and acknowledgement of deeds and other instruments to be used as recorded in this state, and to administer oaths and affirmations, pursuant to Chapter 270: Laws of 1850 and that suck Commissioner was at the time aforesaid duly authorised to take the same, and that I have compared the signature of the said Commissioner to the certificate subjoined to the annexed instrument with the signature of said Commissioner deposited in this Office and have also compared the impression of the seal affixed to such certificate  with the impression of the seal of such Commissioner deposited in this Office and I verily believe the signature and impression of the seal to the said certificate to be genuine.

SS Witness my hand and the seal of Office of the Secretary of State at the City of Albany, this ninth day of March One thousand Eight hundred and Fifty four.
....................................................... E W Leavenworth Secretary of State 

Recorded Examined and Compared with the Original March 10 1854 8 AM
.......................................................... ? ????? Clk

Whew!  Since John and Ann Taylor, Samuel and Mary Ann Vaux, and George and Elizabeth Vaux had moved to Wisconsin by November 1853, the deed had to be signed by them in Wisconsin.  Consequently, the Commissioner for New York in Waupun, Wisconsin summoned them to his office and they signed the deed.  The Commissioner sent it back to the Erie county court, which then sent it to Albany for the Secretary of State to certify that the Commissioner who handled it in Wisconsin was the same person who signed his commission.  Only then could the deed be recorded in Erie County, New York.

The beauty of this document is that it clearly identifies the children of James Vaux, who died in 1839 in Somerset in England possessed of land in Aurora, Erie County, New York.  My third great-grandparents, Samuel and Mary Ann (Underhill) Vaux, are identified as an heir of James Vaux in this document.  It is one of the only documents that does so that I have found to date (I do have a baptismal record of Samuel Vaux son of James and Mary (Palmer) Vaux from South Petherton, Somerset, England).  


Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Best of the Genea-Blogs - 3 to 9 March 2013

Hundreds of genealogy and family history bloggers write thousands of posts every week about their research, their families, and their interests. I appreciate each one of them and their efforts.

My criteria for "Best of ..." are pretty simple - I pick posts that advance knowledge about genealogy and family history, address current genealogy issues, provide personal family history, are funny or are poignant. I don't list posts destined for the genealogy carnivals, or other meme submissions (but I do include summaries of them), or my own posts.

Here are my picks for great reads from the genealogy blogs for this past week:


*  Why Analyze Data? by Donna Brown on DonnaB's Weblog blog.  This is a fascinating analysis of available evidence by Donna - relationships are not always clear or recorded perfectly.

*  A Short History of FamilySearch Family Tree by the writer of The Ancestry Insider blog.  This history hits the salient points of Family Tree without belaboring the hard spots.

*  Personal Genetics - Coming out of the Closet - Ostriches, Eagles and Fear by Roberta J. Estes on the DNAeXplained-Genetic Genealogy blog.  Roberta explains options that persons with personal genetic test results have about sharing their health indicators with the medical and insurance professions.

*  Why a Blog is More Attractive Than a Website by Carole Riley on the Social Media and Genealogy blog.  Carole makes an excellent point - I agree!

*  Where You Should Sit at a Genealogy Conference by Lisa Louise Cooke on Lisa Louise Cooke's Genealogy Gems blog.  Lisa has great suggestions here...if you can find a space up front.

*  WW1 Soldier's Letters Found in Attic of Home by Lorine McGinnis Schulze on the Olive Tree Genealogy Blog.  Lorine did a little research on the soldier's family and ... was rewarded with a TV news segment.  Genealogy on TV!

*  Keeping the Lights On by Craig Scott on Judy Russell's The Legal Genealogist blog.  Craig shares the publisher's side of the digital books story.

*  After Two Decades, the Story That Changed EVERYTHING by Susan A. Kitchens on the Family Oral History Using digital Tools blog.  There are stories within stories...read this for a different perspective.

*  Across Our Northern Border by Carolyn L. Barkley on the GenealogyAndFamilyHistory.com blog.  Carolyn provides a helpful summary of Canadian genealogical resources.

*  Grits Without Salt by Michele Simmons Lewis on the Ancestoring's Ask A Genealogist blog.  Michele answers the question "How do you come up with all that background information?"

*  Five Lessons I Learned From My Trip to Britain by Michael Leclerc on the Mocavo Genealogy Blog.  Michael had two weeks in Britain, and survived, but it was close!  He found lots of genealogy stuff, too.

*  Who Do They Think I Am - A Look at Four Autosomal Analyses by Jim Owston on the Lineal Arboretum blog.  Jim shows his autosomal results from four DNA testing companies - I find this fascinating!

*  The Genealogy Age Gap -- How do We Expand to Include the Youth? by James Tanner on the Genealogy's Star blog.  Great question, and James has reasons why youth aren't interested in genealogy.  What are your ideas here?

These genea-bloggers wrote weekly pick posts and news summary posts this week: 

*  Monday Morning Mentions by Lynn Palermo on The Armchair Genealogist blog.

*  Follow Friday - Fab Finds for March 8, 2013 by Jana Last on Jana's Genealogy and Family History Blog.

*  Follow Friday - Favorites for March 8, 2013 by Heather Kuhn Roelker on the Leaves for Trees blog.

*  Blog Posts for Genealogists, March 8, 2013 by Michael Leclerc on the Mocavo Genealogy Blog.
.
*  Friday Finds - 03/08/13 by Julie Cahill Tarr on the GenBlog blog.

*  Saturday Serendipity by John D. Tew on the Filiopietism Prism blog.

*  Weekly Genealogy Picks - March 3 to 9 by John Newmark on the TransylvanianDutch blog.

I encourage readers to go to the blogs listed above and read their articles, and add their blogs to your Favorites, Google Reader, RSS feed or email if you like what you read. Please make a comment to them also - all bloggers appreciate feedback on what they write.

Did I miss a great genealogy blog post? Tell me! I am currently reading posts from over 1350 genealogy bloggers using Google Reader, but I still miss quite a few it seems.


Read past Best of the Genea-Blogs posts here.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/03/best-of-genea-blogs-3-to-9-march-2013.html

Copyright(c) 2012, Randall J. Seaver 

Saturday, March 9, 2013

Saturday Night Genealogy Fun - A Fearless Female Blog Prompt


Calling all Genea-Musings Fans: 
 It's Saturday Night again - 
time for some more Genealogy Fun!!



Here is your assignment if you choose to play along (cue the Mission Impossible music, please!): 


1)  Read Lisa Alzo's blog post Back for a Fourth Year: Fearless Females: 31 Blogging Prompts to Celebrate Women's History Month on her blogThe Accidental Genealogist.

2)  Choose one of her daily blog prompts from the list (this is March 9th, do that one if you don't want to choose another), and write about it.

3)  Tell us about it in a blog post of your own, in a comment to this blog post, in a Facebook post or a Google+ post.

Here's mine:

I'm going to choose the March 5th prompt - "How did they meet? You’ve documented marriages, now, go back a bit. Do you know the story of how your parents met? Your grandparents?"

From the story I heard from my mother, and from my father's first cousin, Dorothy (Taylor) Chamberlain, how my father met my mother goes like this:

*  My father, Frederick Walton Seaver, came to San Diego in December 1940 from New England, and was staying with his cousin's family (Marshall and Dorothy (Taylor) Chamberlain, and their daughter, Marcia.  They lived at 4601 Terrace Drive in the Kensington neighborhood of San Diego.

*  My mother, Betty Virginia Carringer, was an Art and English teacher at Woodrow Wilson Junior High School, about a half mile away from the Chamberlain's home.  

*  Marcia Chamberlain was a student at Woodrow Wilson Junior High, and was in the Art community there (but did not have Betty as her teacher, but knew her).  

*  After a period of time, around the dinner table one night, Fred said "I need a girl friend..." and Marcia piped up "I know a pretty Art teacher."  

*  Somehow the contact was made, Betty was invited to a dinner at the Chamberlain's to meet Fred, and Seaver family history in San Diego was made!  

*  Fred and Betty were married on 12 July 1942 at All Saints Episcopal Church in San Diego, and resided in Chula Vista until Fred enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1944.  They both worked at Rohr Corporation prior to son Randy's birth in October 1943.

In Dorothy's last years, Linda and I used to take her out for lunch occasionally, and invariably she would tell this story to us as if it was new to our ears.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/03/saturday-night-genealogy-fun-fearless.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver 

Surname Saturday - LNU (colonial Massachusetts)

It's Surname Saturday, and I'm "counting down" my Ancestral Name List each week.  

I am in the 7th great-grandmothers, up to number 569: Hannah LNU (????-1690). [Note: the 7th great-grandfathers have been covered in earlier posts].  [Note:  LNU = Last Name Unknown...]

My ancestral line back through one American generation of this LNU family line is:

1.  Randall J. Seaver

2. Frederick Walton Seaver (1911-1983)
3. Betty Virginia Carringer (1919-2002)

4. Frederick Walton Seaver (1876-1942)
5. Alma Bessie Richmond (1882-1962)

8. Frank Walton Seaver (1852-1922)
9. Hattie Louise Hildreth (1857-1920)

16. Isaac Seaver (1823-1901)
17. Lucretia Townsend Smith (1827-1884)

34.  Alpheus B. Smith (1802-1840)
35.  Elizabeth Horton Dill (1791-1869)


70.  Thomas Dill (1755-1830)
71.  Hannah Horton (1761-1797)


142.  Nathaniel Horton (1721-1775)
143.  Eunice Snow (1722-????)

284.  Samuel Horton (1686-1778)
285.  Hannah Atwood (1686-????)

568.  John Horton, died before 06 April 1710 in Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States.  He married before 1677

569.  Hannah, died 07 January 1689/90 in Boston, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United States.
Children of John Horton and Hannah are:
i. Hopestill Horton, born about 1677 in probably Boston, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United States; died 28 March 1734 in Chatham, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States; married (1) Ebenezer Snow 22 December 1698 in Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States; born 1680 in Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States; died 09 April 1725 in Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States; married (2) Thomas Atkins 28 June 1739 in Barnstable, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States; born 19 June 1671 in Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States; died 1750 in Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States.
ii. Dorothy Horton, born about 1680 in probably Boston, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United States; died before 1738 in Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States; married David Doane 30 September 1701 in Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States; born about 1674 in Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States; died 18 November 1748 in Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States.
iii. Samuel Horton, born 31 January 1685/86 in Boston, Suffolk, Massachusetts, United States; died before 01 April 1778 in Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States; married Hannah Atwood 28 January 1713/14 in Eastham, Barnstable, Massachusetts, United States.

I know very little about John Horton (whose surname may have been Haughton or Houghton) and even less about his wife, Hannah.  

The one resource that I have for descendants of John and Hannah (--?--) Horton is:

Margaret Horton Weiler, "Descendants of John Horton (Haughton) of Eastham," Bulletin of the Cape Cod Genealogical Society, (Harwich, Mass.: the society, September 1983).  

This work says about John and Hannah:

"John-1 Horton (Haughton) lived in Boston, MA with his wife Hannah, perhaps the Hannah Harden, daughter of Joseph and Mary (Long) Harden, who died in Boston 7 Jan 1690.  On 6 Apr 1710 an administration for the late John Horton of Eastham was granted to his 'brother-in-law' Ebenezer Snow."

Apparently, Margaret Horton Weiler wrote a book about this Horton family:

Margaret Horton Weiler, Descendants of John Horton of Boston, Massachusetts and New London, Connecticut through his son Samuel Horton of Eastham, Massachusetts, (Camden, Me.: Penobscot Press, 1994).

I need to obtain that book, I think.  Where's my to-do list?  Ah, in RootsMagic!!

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/03/surname-saturday-lnu-colonial.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver

Friday, March 8, 2013

Review: Legacy QuickGuide for Lineage Societies and Genealogy

Legacy Family Tree has commissioned a series of four-page booklets on various aspects of genealogical research.  Each laminated guide contains four pages of valuable information covering a variety of genealogy research topics. Legacy QuickGuides are written by genealogists and family historians who are experts in the subject areas.  These QuickGuides are oriented towards the online researcher - there are several pages of website links on selected subjects for the specific topic covered by the QuickGuide.

You can see the list of available Legacy QuickGuides at          http://www.legacyfamilytreestore.com/SearchResults.asp?Cat=71.  They are available as laminated four-page folders ($7.95 each) or as downloadable PDF files ($2.95 each).

The Legacy QuickGuide for Lineage Societies and Genealogy was written by Julie Tarr.


The Introduction to this QuickGuide says:

"Sometimes the decision to join a lineage society is easy because you have already done your research and know you have an ancestor by which you would qualify for membership—and you can prove that lineal relationship. Perhaps you are stalling because you do not know where to start or may find yourself intimidated by the process. Other times, you may not be aware that you have an ancestor lurking in your tree that could qualify you for membership in a society. Or perhaps you are missing proof for a link or two in your lineage.

"The Lineage Societies and Genealogy Legacy QuickGuide contains useful information to provide you with an introduction to lineage societies and some tools and tips to help you with your research and the application process. With a little know-how and encouragement, you will be well on your way to exploring the many lineage societies out there and furthering the research of your ancestors. This 4-sided, laminated guide is easily portable to take along on your next genealogy research trip."

The subjects included in the Lineage Societies and Genealogy  QuickGuide are:

*  Overview
*  Resources - Books

*  Resources - Online
*  Archives, Libraries & Repositories
*  Documentation

*  Selected Lineage Societies

*  Tips and Tricks
*  Other Lineage Programs
*  Toolkit
*  Further Reading

For several subjects, the items listed have website titles with links to the websites.  In some cases, there are shortened URLs for websites with long eddresses.

This Legacy QuickGuide is very useful for beginners and seasoned researchers alike.  The information about the overview, documentation required, different lineage societies, the organizations list, and the tips and tricks are very helpful, and the links to online resources will be useful.

The laminated version of this QuickGuide is very handy for researchers going to repositories or society meetings - it is light and easy to carry in a briefcase or computer case.  I much prefer the PDF version because I can save it to my computer (and laptop, tablet, and smart phone using Dropbox or another cloud service) and have it available in digital format for instantaneous usage by clicking the links provided rather than typing the links into my web browser.

Order your copy of the  
Lineage Societies and Genealogy  QuickGuide (PDF or printed laminated folder) at the Legacy Family Tree Store.

Disclosure:  I was provided a complimentary copy of the PDF version of this Legacy QuickGuide on the condition that I provide a timely review of each QuickGuide provided.  Look for more in the near future!

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/03/review-legacy-quickguide-for-lineage.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver

Follow-Up Friday - Helpful/Interesting Reader Comments

It's Friday morning, so time to recount the helpful and interesting reader comments from the past week, and respond to them if the mood strikes me.

1)  On Surname Saturday - COLE (England > Massachusetts) (2 March 2013):

*  Shirley said:  "I am wondering how the surname cloud was created. Is this something you designed, or did you use a software program?"

My response:  A "Surname cloud" or any other type of cloud can be created using www.wordle.net.  I put multiple copies of my surnames into the list, according to how many generations I had, in order to get the relative word sizes.

2)  On My 23andMe DNA Test Results - Post 1 (5 March 2013):

*  Dan Stone asked:  "Have you compared the raw numbers, where available, between the various tests you've taken to see how they compare? I'd be interested to know how the Y-DNA test numbers of one company match up with another company's numbers. Ideally, they will be the same for the same markers, and only the refinement of the matching process is different and/or has changed over time. If the raw numbers are different, I'd be extremely curious as to an explanation for why they are different."

My response:  I have not done that yet, because I don't see the "raw numbers" yet.  I got exactly the same Y-DNA results from the two earlier tests for the common markers used.  I got somewhat different results for the two previous autosomal tests.  This 23andMe test covers all three results - Y-chromosome, mitochondrial, and autosomal, and I'll try to compare them with the others when I figure out how to do that.  I'm hoping that CeCe Moore's seminar at CVGS on 30 March will help me with this.

*  Kassie mused:  "I've thought about this, but it seems like the results fed back are sooo complex. Did you find the report "user friendly" or did you do lots of pre-search before finally ordering the test? I think $99 sounds pretty cheap, but I don't want to waste $$ on something I won't understand...thoughts?"

My response:  The results are very complex, but I thought that 23andMe did a pretty good job in displaying them, and explaining them.  With AncestryDNA and FamilyTreeDNA Family Finder autosomal tests, they focused on finding matches to my results in addition to the ethnic percentages (which for me are pretty bland!).  FTDNA also showed the chromosome segments that matched selected other persons.  I don't have the result matches from the 23andme test yet, and when I do, I will report on it.

Considering that the prices just for the autosomal test on Ancestry and FTDNA are equal to or higher than the $99 test on 23andme (which provides health characteristics, plus autosomal, mitochondrial, and Y-chromosome DNA results if males take the test), the 23andme test is more extensive and is an excellent "deal."  It's a one-stop test and includes your health characteristics.

If you study the information on the websites of the test companies, you will understand what they do, and what the test results mean.  You don't have to understand the deep science of how they do it - I don't - but with a little study you can understand your test results.

3)  On FamilySearch Family Tree Open for Everyone (5 March 2013):

*  Geolover noted:  "Randy, glad you posted some helpful resources for those who would try out the Family Search Family Tree. There's one more that could be useful, a message board monitored by some experienced users, as well as by design, engineering and managerial staff who would like to be aware of any bugs or unusual glitches:  https://getsatisfaction.com/familysearch/topics"

My response:  Thanks - I will add that to my post.

4)  On (Not So) Wordless Wednesday - Post 246: A Wedding Day Photo (6 March 2013):

*  John D. Tew asked:  "I have to ask though since you have the full original photo -- is your father standing on the train of your mother's wedding gown? It looks like it in the photo."

My response:  Good catch.  I saw it too, when I magnified the image to see the photographer's imprint.  I think that he is stepping on the train, perhaps to hold it down.  I sure hope that he stepped off of it before they went on to the reception.

5)  On Sorting Out Primary and Secondary Information (6 March 2013):

Thank you all for your helpful and challenging responses in Comments.  Many of us are trying to "figure all of this out" still, including myself. 

There are a number of very useful comments on this post and I may deal with them in a separate blog post.  I do agree with Angela Craft that the birth certificate is an abstract from the Original Source and could be considered a Derivative.  But the discussion was about Information rather than Source quality.

I agree that I definitely don't know who provided the information to the town clerk.  I believe, but don't know for sure, that someone in the family, and I think usually the father of the child, went down to the town clerk's office in New England and reported the birth.  It might be another relative - a grandparent, an aunt or uncle, etc. I doubt that many records of this type report the actual informant (i.e., "Benjamin Seaver came to my office and said his wife had a baby we named Isaac."). This town record is the very FIRST record of the birth.  It may be Primary or Secondary, but to me, it is BETTER, closer to PRIMARY than SECONDARY, information than the other records, which are clearly derived from it.  

I had not considered an UNKNOWN classification for Information as Jenny suggested.  It's not in the BCG definitions.  We may want an UNSURE or UNKNOWN classification for Information...

Bob McAlister's comment resonated with me:  "At least part of the difficulty you mention comes from the fact that the first two dimensions are not independent.  Once you decide that the source is derivative, then the information can not be primary. If an eye-witness to the event made a copy of the original source, it would itself be an original source with the same provenance as the first (save for the lapse of time).  It is sleight of hand to claim that we have analysed each document on three distinct criteria when two of them are inextricably intertwined."

That simplifies the Information categorizing a bit.

I do believe that this particular birth record for Isaac Seaver is not a "copy" from another record book, and that Westminster, Massachusetts used this "family group" method to record births and deaths throughout its early history.  To me, it is the Original Source.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/03/follow-up-friday-helpfulinteresting.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver