Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Using RootsMagic 6 to Update FamilySearch Family Tree Families - Post 2: Editing the Person Profile Data

'm writing a new "how to" for updating the FamilySearch Family Tree (a unified tree, intended to include everyone in one tree, freely editable and modified by any registered FamilySearch registered user) using the RootsMagic 6 genealogy software program.  At this time, RootsMagic 6 is the only FamilySearch certified software program that can add, edit or delete content on the FamilySearch Family Tree, but that should  change very soon (i.e., more software programs will have this capability).

In Using RootsMagic 6 to Update FamilySearch Family Tree Families - Post 1: the "Before" Tree Person Profiles, I showed how to use RootsMagic to access a person in the FamilySearch Family Tree, and compare the information between My RootsMagic Person and My FamilySearch Person.

In this post, I want to show how to add, edit or delete information in the FamilySearch Family Tree using RootsMagic 6.  

1)  Again, we start with clicking the FamilySearch icon on the Pedigree, Family or Descendants View in RootsMagic 6 (circled in red on the Family View shown below):



2)  The "Share Data" tab screen opens, as shown in the first post in this series (only the top part shown below)


I have a list of items that I want to add, edit or delete from the FamilySearch Family Tree Person Profile, and several to add to the RootsMagic profile (assuming that the vital record information is correct in My RootsMagic Person), including:

*  Resolve the Name field - should I use the nickname in the name?
*  I have what I think are better birth and death dates in My RootsMagic Person, with standard localities, and want to replace them in My FamilySearch Person.
*  I want to add the Burial Fact to My FamilySearch Person.
*  There is a redundant marriage date and wrong locality in the FamilySearch Person.
*  There is an AKA name in the FamilySearch Person that duplicates the entry.
*  There are several Alternate Names in the FamilySearch Person that are duplicates or redundant or confusing, and I want to add one of them to My RootsMagic Person.

3)  First, I want to check that there are not Duplicate Persons in the FamilySearch Family Tree.  If there are, I want to combine them now so that I don't have to do it later.  I clicked on the "Find Matches" tab just below the highlighted Person's name on the screen below:


My Mary Metcalf has already been matched with a Mary Metcalf in the FamilySearch Family Tree.  There are a number of other candidates as duplicates, but after scanning them carefully, I don't think any of them are a duplicate Person for the Mary Metcalf already in the Family Tree.

If I was Adding a new Name from RootsMagic that didn't match a person in the Family Tree, the screen above would open and would search for Duplicate Names and if they were a match, I could select them.

4)  Back to the "Share Data" tab, and I'm ready to work on the problems.  First is the Name.  I have "Mary "Polly" Metcalf" as her name in RootsMagic; the Family Tree has her as "Mary (Polly) Metcalf."  I clicked on the box to the left of the name in My RootsMagic Person:


A "What do you want to do with this fact?" window opened, with several choices.  I wanted to Replace the Family Tree name with the RootsMagic name.  I clicked on that selection.  It didn't do what I requested - it put only "Mary Metcalf" in the Family Tree person list.  I tried several more times without success and finally decided that the Family Tree doesn't want quote marks around a name in the Family Tree.  Okay, I'll change the Name in My RootsMagic Person later.

5)  Next item on my list was to change the Birth Fact information.  I clicked on the box next to the Birth Fact and saw:


The only choice was to Replace the item, so I did that.

6)  The next item was the Death date and locality, and I Replaced that also:


I also Added the Burial Fact to the FamilySearch Person.

7)  Now I wanted to delete the extra Marriage Fact on the FamilySearch Person.  I chose to "Remove this fact from FamilySearch:"


I also Removed the AKA name which was a duplicate of the FamilySearch Person's name.

8)  I want to delete all of the Alternate Names on the FamilySearch Person except for "Polly Metcalf." So I clicked the box next to each alternate Name and selected "Remove this name from FramilySearch."


9)  When I got to the Alternate Name of "Polly Metcalf," I wanted to add that to My RootsMagic Person.  So I clicked the box next to the name and selected "Add a new name to RootsMagic."


I finished Removing the rest of the Alternate Names.

9)  There is a fifth child in the list of children of Mary Metcalf and Amos Underhill for the FamilySearch Person.  I clicked on the box for that fifth child, and perused the options, as shown in the screen below:


I looked for Robert Duncan Underhill in the FamilySearch Family Tree and found him, with no other information than an estimated birth date of 1810.  I found that other records, on Ancestry, Find A Grave, GenForum and other sites, list a Robert Duncan Underhill born in 1810 to John and Mary Esther (Mitchell) Underhill in Sullivan County, N.H.  My tentative conclusion is that he doesn't belong in the family of Amos and Mary (Metcalf) Underhill.  I decided to leave him on the FamilySearch Person list for the time being.

10)  Finally, I recalled that I had not removed the Nickname from My RootsMagic Person, so I did that in the "Edit Person" form in RootsMagic.  The final screen for Mary Metcalf in the RootsMagic "FamilySearch Person Tools" screen looks like this:



I accomplished everything I set out to do.

11) What does the "cleaned up" Person Profile in the FamilySearch Family Tree system look like?  Here is the page for Mary Metcalf (three screens, no overlap):




Strangely, the children of the second marriage of Mary Metcalf, with James P. Underhill, that are in the "My FamilySearch Person" list in RootsMagic, do not show up in the FamilySearch Family Tree. 

12) The next problem, and it's a big one, is to consider the second "family" listed on the "My FamilySearch Person" side of the RootsMagic "FamilySearch Person Tools" screen, down at the bottom.  I sincerely doubt that this Marriage is factual; in fact James P. Underhill (with a birth year of 1775) is actually one of her children with Amos Underhill, and the four children listed for their marriage are Mary's children, but all are by Amos Underhill.  One has the name James Pierce Underhill with the same FamilySearch ID number (LHBP-JXH) as the one in the list of children with Amos Underhill.

The next post in this series will try to deal with all of that.  It is apparent to me that the James P. Underhill husband entry for Mary Metcalf is fictitious, and that the children listed for the marriage are identical to Mary's children with Amos Underhill, but three of them have different FamilySearch ID numbers, so they are duplicate entries in the FamilySearch system.

13)  The effort to clean up the information for Mary Metcalf using RootsMagic 6 took about ten minutes to complete.  There are significant wait times for some of the actions (20 to 30 seconds in some cases).  It would probably be easier and faster to do some of the actions (especially the Removing duplicate Facts or Alternate Names) in the FailySearch Family Tree environment.  

In my experience to date with FamilySearch Family Tree, the cleanup effort I did is fairly typical - some persons need less, some need more.  Once you learn the routine, you can do it with some confidence.  

Someone has to do this, and since Mary (Metcalf) Underhill is my ancestor, I'm doing it.  Other researchers may come along and disagree and add or edit content - so be it.  I dread doing it for my Massachusetts immigrant ancestors in the first half of the 17th century - the task will be much larger there, I fear, due to many duplicate Persons and many more duplicate or erroneous or redundant Facts, Names, etc.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/06/using-rootsmagic-6-to-update_5.html

Copyright (c) 2013), Randall J. Seaver


Quick First Peek at Legacy 8

Legacy Family Tree Version 8 genealogy software should be released sometime in 2013, according to what Geoff Rasmussen just said on the Legacy Family Tree Webinar which started at 11 a.m. today.

Here is a screen shot of the Version 8 Pedigree View:


The current Legacy Family Tree 7.5 Pedigree View looks like this (my colors):


Geoff said that more screen views will be shown on the Legacy News blog soon - and should be shown at the SCGS Genealogy Jamboree in his talk on Friday morning, 7 June.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/06/quick-first-look-at-legacy-8.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver

GEDCOM X Matures into the FamilySearch API

Ryan Heaton had a post yesterday on the GEDCOM X blog titled "GEDCOM X Milestone 1" stating:

"After over two years of collaboration and active development, we're excited to announce the first stable milestone release of the core GEDCOM X specification set."

and:

"The purpose of the milestone release is to stabilize the specification set so we can move to the next phase of development. The focus of the next phase will be specifically on documentation and developer tools. This includes 'non-normative' tutorials, use cases, and recipes as well as the development of open-source libraries for the most popular platforms."

Over the past week, Tamura Jones has published several analyses of GEDCOM X on his Modern Software Experience website:

*  GEDCOM X 1.0.0 M1 (4 June 2013)

Tamura has tested the code (perhaps the only non-FS person who has, and written publicly about it), has determined that some GEDCOM features (like NOTES) are not yet included, and concludes that "GEDCOM X is not related to GEDCOM, but to the FamilySearch Family Tree API."  

I think he's right.  The FamilySearch Developer Network  Forum called it the "FamilySearch API" in "FamilySearch API Release" on 31 May 2013.

FamilySearch has developed GEDCOM X independently from the other efforts to improve the GEDCOM capability to transfer genealogical data from one program or website to another.  The GEDCOM X API can, apparently, be used to perform these tasks so that genealogy software programs can interface with the FamilySearch Family Tree and transfer data to and from the Family Tree.  

Why is it called GEDCOM X?  I guess that it got a name early on because someone at FamilySearch said "We really need to improve the current GEDCOM Standard to incorporate modern genealogy software features," funding the project, and then while thinking that through, the need for the New FamilySearch API arose, and that morphed into FamilySearch Family Tree and someone at FamilySearch said "Let's make GEDCOM X do both functions, and maybe it will become the standard for the industry."

Will GEDCOM X be a standard?  It will be if the genealogy data providers (e.g., Ancestry, MyHeritage, FindMyPast, etc.), the online family tree providers, and genealogy software providers adopt and use the API for competitive and commercial reasons.  If they want to interface with the FamilySearch Family Tree, they will have to adopt it.  I can see all genealogy providers being able to handle both the current GEDCOM file structure and the GEDCOM X structure to transfer family tree information from one platform to another.  This is truly and example of "Build it, and they will come!"

The big issue for me, and for many others, is how the accuracy, completeness and format of genealogical data will be transferred between platforms.  I think that the most difficult issue is source citations, since each software company and online family tree site has created their own custom fields for source citations using the Evidence! Explained models, and reading those from one platform to another using GEDCOM often creates a mess that is not easily rectified.  I think that most of the other GEDCOM issues are more easily resolved.

My conclusion is that FamilySearch has created a de facto standard for transferring genealogical data from one platform to another, and that the other genealogical industry entities will accept that standard and use it.  Hopefully, FamilySearch will be open to suggestions and modifications suggested by companies and researchers to add features and resolve problems as they arise.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/06/gedcom-x-matures-into-familysearch-api.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver



(Not So) Wordless Wednesday - Post 259: Edward Seaver Graduates From College

I'm posting family photographs from my collection on Wednesdays, but they aren't Wordless Wednesday posts like others do - I am incapable of having a wordless post.

Here is a photograph from the Seaver/Richmond family photograph collection passed to me by my cousin Laura in 2008:
 




This photograph shows Alma Bessie (Richmond) Seaver (1882-1962), Edward Richmond Seaver (1913-2004), and Frederick Walton Seaver (1876-1942) on the happy occasion of Ed's graduation from Columbia University, probably in 1935.  I don't know the exact setting for the photograph, but it is probably at Columbia in New York City.

Alma Bessie and Frederick were my paternal grandparents, and Ed Seaver was my father's only brother that survived childhood.  Ed was the first college graduate in my Seaver line, I believe.  He also played college football and the team went to the 1934 Rose Bowl, defeating Stanford 67-0 on a rainy day.  

My thanks to cousin Laura for sending this picture, and many others, to me, and for permitting me to display them.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/06/not-so-wordless-wednesday-post-259.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

FamilySearch Family Tree Prints Pedigree Charts and Family Group Records

While working with the FamilySearch Family Tree today, I noticed that there are now links to Pedigree [Chart] and Family [Group Record] under a "Print" heading on a Person Profile page.

1)  Here's an example:


The "Print" area is on the right-hand side of the screen above.

2)  When I click on the "Pedigree" link, a 4 generation Pedigree Chart with the information for the person's family is filled in the blanks (two screens below):



These two screens save as one 8.5 x 11 page.  There is a second page for information about the Contributor.

The user can add or edit information to every data field on this form (the blue background areas).  Long names, dates or place names are truncated.  The user has to use the default font.

I would like to see a Source number for records with a Source, and an accompanying Source List for the persons on the Pedigree Chart.  Perhaps this will be added later?

The Pedigree Chart can be saved as a PDF file, but once it is saved, it cannot be edited.

3)  Clicking on the "Family" link in the "Print" area opens a multi-page Family Group Record, tailored for the specific family size.

The first page looks like (2 screens below):



The two screens above are on one page.

Additional children are on additional pages, with five to a page.

The next section of the Family Group Record is the Sources and Notes:


I didn't print out all of the Sources and Notes for all of the persons on the Family Group Record.

The Sources are the items attached to the Sources area in the Person Profile.  They do not include the FamilySearch record collection name, and include only the permanent link to the record summary.  For the bottom source on the screen above, I added a Note to that Source describing the record itself.  Here is what appears in the Source field on the Person Profile for that particular Source:


I wonder why the complete Citation and notes don't appear on the Family Group Record list?  It should, in my humble opinion.  If the Record Collection names are not added to this Source listing, we may have to add more Notes to the Sources so that they are informative at not just a link.

Note that there are no Notes yet.  I thought that Stories might be published  in this space, but I tried that and they are not.

The Family Group Record can be saved to a PDF file and printed out (although the user cannot type in the fields after the file is saved).


The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/06/familysearch-family-tree-prints.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver

Using RootsMagic 6 to Update FamilySearch Family Tree Families - Post 1: the "Before" Tree Person Profiles

I'm writing a new "how to" for updating the FamilySearch Family Tree (a unified tree, intended to include everyone in one tree, freely editable and modified by any registered FamilySearch registered user) using the RootsMagic 6 genealogy software program.  At this time, RootsMagic 6 is the only FamilySearch certified software program that can add, edit or delete content on the FamilySearch Family Tree, but that should change very soon (i.e., more software programs will have this capability).

In this post, I want to show what an existing Person Profile for one of my ancestors looks like on the FamilySearch Family Tree, and in my RootsMagic 6 software program.  I will also highlight the obvious errors, duplications, and inconsistencies found in the Tree profile.  In succeeding posts, I'll show how to add, edit and delete information on the Tree using RootsMagic.  Finally, in a later post, I'll show the corrected Person Profile in the FamilySearch Family Tree.

1)  Here is what the FamilySearch Family Tree Person Profile for Mary Metcalf (1776-1850/1860) looks like (4 screens, some overlap):





There are these main sections of the Person Profile above:

*  Vital Information - name, gender, birth, christening, death, burial
*  Other Information - alternate names, custom events, etc.
*  Family - spouses and children - spouse's name, marriage date, children names - for each marriage
*  Family - parents and siblings - parents names, siblings names - for each set of parents
*  Sources
*  Discussions

2)  RootsMagic 6 can access the FamilySearch Family Tree data by using the FamilySearch icon on the Pedigree View, Family View, or Descendants View.  The Family View is shown below:


The FamilySearch icon is circled in red on the Family View above.  For children in a family, the icon is at the far right of the screen above (scroll right to find it).

3)  After clicking the icon, the FamilySearch Person Tools screen appeared (two screens below, some overlap):



As you can see, the RootsMagic screens above show the RootsMagic data for my person in the column on the left, and the FamilySearch data for my person in the right column.

Lines that agree between the two databases are in green background, lines that are similar are in yellow background, and lines that are not in one or the other columns are in white background.

A close comparison between the information in the Person Profile in the FamilySearch Family Tree and the "My FamilySearch Person" column (the right column) shows that they are identical.

A close comparison between my RootsMagic person and My FamilySearch Person columns show significant differences between the two lists.

4)  My goal in this blog post series is to show how to make the two lists the same, as accurate as possible, and consistent.  That means deleting extraneous or duplicate information (some alternate names), standardizing dates and place names, reconciling differences between data entries (death date, place), and eliminating wrong relationships (e.g., Mary Metcalf did not marry her son, James P. Underhill!). I will try to add Sources and Discussions also.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/06/using-rootsmagic-6-to-update.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver

Tuesday's Tip - "Mastering Genealogical Proof" by Thomas W. Jones

This week's Tuesday's Tip is:  Order and read Thomas W. Jones new book, Mastering Genealogical Proof.  Then participate in a Study Group.

The National Genealogical Society announced publication of this book in a press release on 24 April 2013.


The description of the book says:


Mastering Genealogical Proof aims to help researchers, students, and new family historians reconstruct relationships and lives of people they cannot see. It presents content in digestible chunks. Each chapter concludes with problems providing practice for  proficiently applying the chapter’s concepts. Those problems, like examples throughout the book, use real records, real research, and real issues. Answers are at the back of the book along with a glossary of technical terms and an extensive resource list.

Thomas W. Jones, who has pursued his family history since he was fifteen, is an award-winning genealogical researcher, writer, editor, and educator.

Contents: 
  • Preface 
  • Chapter 1 - Genealogy’s Standard of Proof
  • Chapter 2 - Concepts Fundamental to the GPS
  • Chapter 3 - GPS Element 1: Thorough Research
  • Chapter 4 GPS Element 2: Source Citations
  • Chapter 5 GPS Element 3: Analysis and Correlation
    Chapter 6 GPS Element 4: Resolving Conflicts and Assembling Evidence
  • Chapter 7 GPS Element 5: The Written Conclusion
  • Chapter 8 - Using the GPS
  • Chapter 9 - Conclusion
  • Appendix A - Pritchett Article
  • Appendix B - McLain Article
  • Glossary
  • Reading and Source List
  • Answers to exercises

See the PDF for the full list of contents. See also a sample exercise

Ordering Information:  You can order your copy of Mastering Genealogical Proof today. Order online (payment in full required at time of order).

Temporarily out-of-stock, but accepting back orders. Expected shipment date: 15 June 2013.

==========================

I ordered my book when the press release was published, and received it just before the NGS 2013 Conference.  

If you are interested in improving your genealogical research, analytical skills, and writing skills, and perhaps being a professional genealogist in the future, you NEED this book, you NEED to read it carefully, and apply the principles taught in this book.

What can you do once you get your book?  

1)  There are online Study Groups for this book - you can see more details about the groups at Angela McGhie's blog, Adventures in Genealogy Education. Here are links to learn about and join a "Gen Proof Study Group":

*  "Gen Proof" Groups to Study Mastering Genealogical Proof
*  Gen Proof Study Groups – How To Get In

There may be a waiting list for the Gen Proof Study Groups due to demand and mentor availability, and there will be homework required for members of each study group to perform and share with their peers in the group and their mentor.

2)  DearMYRTLE will start a weekly Hangout on Air (run through her Google+ DearMYRTLE's Genealogy Community) and accessible on YouTube on the DearMYRTLE YouTube Channel.  The panelists are already picked, but anybody can VIEW the Hangouts on the YouTube channel live, or anytime after the event.  There is homework for this online study group.  Comments during the live event can be made in a stream thread on the DearMYRTLE's Genealogy Community.

The live weekly Hangouts on air will be at 8 p.m. EDT, 7 p.m. CDT, 6 p.m. MDT, 5 p.m. PDT on Sundays, starting 16 June 2013.  A VIEWer Guide video is available on YouTube here.  An orientation HOA was held last Sunday, and is available on YouTube here.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/06/tuesdays-tip-mastering-genealogical.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver

Monday, June 3, 2013

Do You Have Issues/Suggestions/Questions for Ancestry.com?

I like to visit the Exhibit Hall at genealogy conferences, and I like to ask questions, make suggestions, or raise issues, with the exhibitors and suppliers.  I'm on my way to the Southern California Genealogical Society Genealogy Jamboree in Burbank on Thursday, so I want to give my readers an opportunity to think of the issues they have with, suggestions for, or questions they have for, Ancestry.com.

I have several:

*  The sources for Ancestry.com record summaries and images are non-standard, they aren't Chicago, Turabian, MLA, APA or Evidence! Explained format.  Will ANY effort be expended to upgrade the source citations that are listed on a record summary or attached to a person or event in an Ancestry Member Tree?

*  Will "Old" Search be continued, or will it be retired?  If it will be retired, when?  If it is retired, what features will be integrated into "New" Search?

*  "New" Search is very complex with the Name and Location filters feature (which are very useful if you know how to use them!).  Can the filters be made more user friendly, and/or can short video tutorials be provided on the Search page so more users can learn how to use them effectively?

*  Many users complain about getting results from searches that are outside of the life span of the individual sought in the search, or outside of a specified locality.  Is there a way to restrict search results to a specific year range?  Or to a specific set of states (say one central state, and the surrounding states)?

I'm sure that my readers have many more issues, suggestions and questions for Ancestry.com - what are they?  Please offer them in comments to this blog post, or in email to me (rjseaver@cox.net) if you cannot defeat the Captcha.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/06/do-you-have-issuessuggestionsquestions.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver

Finally Received Record Matches on MyHeritage

At the NGS Conference in Las Vegas in May, I talked at some length with Gilad Japhet about the new MyHeritage features like Record Matches, Record Extraction, and Record Detective.    I wrote about Record detective in:

*  MyHeritage To Announce Record Detective Feature (11 May 2013)
*  First Look at Record Detective and Record Extraction Features on MyHeritage (13 May 2013)
*  Does the MyHeritage Record Detective Find My Isaac Seaver Search Results? (14 May 2013)

Gilad kindly offered me a second family tree site so that I could work with the Family Tree Builder 7.0 software, since the tree I have on MyHeritage would not sync to the Family Tree Builder 7.0 software for some reason (is it too old?  Too messed up?  I don't know!).

I was able to easily upload a smaller GEDCOM file (titled Seaver-Leland Family Tree) of just my ancestral families to Family Tree Builder 7.0, and then that was uploaded and synced to a new MyHeritage family tree.  I did during the week after the NGS Conference, on 16 May 2013.

But when I checked the tree on MyHeritage during the past three weeks, there were no Record Matches, and therefore the Record Detective didn't provide more matches.

I checked my MyHeritage page again today, and now there are Record Matches for my new tree.  So, it took under three weeks for a new tree to receive Record Matches.  I don't know if this is typical, but it may be.  I don't think that I received any "special treatment" for the Record Matches in this case.

1)  Here is the page listing the record collections with Record Matches (3 screens shown):




2)  I clicked on the Find A Grave listing, and then on one of the Record Matches listed, for Benjamin McKnew (two screens below, some overlap):



As you can see, there are some possibly related records in the "Record Detective" section below the Find A Grave information.  I ran my mouse over one of them in the screen above, and it provided the OCR text from that possible match.

3)  If I click on the possible record match, I see the newspaper page image with information about the paper, and also the other possible Record Matches found by the "Record Detective" (two screens shown):



4)  I clicked Back to the first screen with the Find A Grave Record Match, and clicked on the green "Confirm" button to register that the record pertained to the Benjamin McKnew in my tree:


5)  After I clicked on the Confirm" button, the "Extract Record" screen opened so that I could attach this record to the person in my tree (two screens below):



6)  When I go into my MyHeritage tree and go to Benjamin McKnew's person page, the attached record is shown in the left column under the Info tab heading of "Records."


7)  I checked the three newspaper articles, and since all three had the same information (but for different dates), I also extracted one of the records to Benjamin's file.

8)  As you can see, I can get Record Matches from the list of Record Matches, or from the Person Profile of a person.  I can Confirm or Reject those matches in either location.  Therefore, I can receive Record Matches if I'm going down the Record Match list for one source, or I can receive them in a Person Profile.

9)  What I cannot (yet) do is to do Research for a person and save pertinent search results to a Person Profile yet.  I'm hoping that MyHeritage is working on adding that feature!  I hope that MyHeritage is working on adding more database content also, and fixing the U.S. Census Record matching so that all matches are found in the census years before 1900.

Note that a MyHeritage user must have a Family Tree account and a Data account in order to perform the above searches and actions.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/06/finally-received-record-matches-on.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver

Disclosure:  I have a complimentary subscription to both MyHeritage.com and WorldVitalRecords.com courtesy of MyHeritage, for which I am grateful.  However, this does not influence my objective opinions in reviews of these websites and their products. 

Amanuensis Monday - Probate Records of Adam Mott (1596-1661) of Portsmouth, R.I.

Genea-blogger John Newmark (who writes the excellent TransylvanianDutch blog) started a Monday blog theme many months ago called Amanuensis Monday. What does "amanuensis" mean? John offers this definition:

"A person employed to write what another dictates or to copy what has been written by another."

The subject today is the probate file of Adam Mott (1596-1661).  Adam married (1) Elizabeth Creed (????-1635) in 1616 in Saffron Walden, Essex, England, and they had five children:


*  male Mott (1617-1617)
*  John Mott (1618-????)
*  Adam Mott (1623-1712), married 1647 Mary Lott (1630-1712)
*  Jonathan Mott (1626-????)
*  Elizabeth Mott (1629-1694), married 1647 Edward Thurston (1618-1707)

Adam Mott married (2) Sarah (--?--) Lott in 1635 in England.  They had three children:

*  Jacob Mott (1636-1711), married 1660 Joanna Slocum (1642-1728)
*  Gershom Mott (1638-????)
*  Eleazer Mott (1640-????)

Adam Mott of Portsmouth died testate, having written his will dated 2 April 1661, which was proved on 31 August 1661.  The will reads (from The Early Records of the Town of Portsmouth, (Providence R.I.: Rhode Island Historical Society, 1901), accessed on FHL Microfilm 0,945,382, Item 3, pages 387-389 in printed version):

"The Last will & Testament of Adam mott Senyor of ye towne of portsmoth is as followeth

"In ye yere of ye lord 1661 on the 2 month on ye 2 day of the month I Adam Mott of portsmoth of road Iland beinge in pearfit & good memory have made & writen this as my last will with my owne hand  Imprimus  I have Chosen Constetuted & made my faithfull freinds Edward Thurston and Richard Tew both of Newport on Rhoad Iland to have full power togeather after my decease to see my will performed and fulfiled in Every part of it as I were my selfe alive in perfit beinge

"First I will & give to Sarah mott my wife beinge all my howsiage & land at matapurcetti lyinge in ye bounds of portsmoth, less or more with all the apirtenances there unto wch are knowne to be mine upon ye grownd or abroud upon ye Common, all goods or Chattells whot so Ever houssage and all moveables whot so Ever, to use possese & injoy for hir terme of life as shee shall Neede, say out of ye stock and at ye End of hir life after hir decease, I will that the afore said Executors Edward Thurston & Richard Tew shall see ye land Named and howse & houssage Equaly devided in to three shares, to Jacob mott my owne sonne if he be Contented to Cast in whot I gave him at the upar Cornar of my farme & share it into three parts, if not he may take that out as his part and no more, unto Adam mott my sonne I gave his share all redey & part longe since he hath lived on whos sum wos twelve Acres

Further I will yt if any of ye Brothers shall dye before my wife of ye three Jacob mott Gearsham mott & Eleazer mott as to saye that then the three parts by ye Executors be devided unto ye othere two as Equaly as they Can, allso I will that these three or two of them that injoye the land after there mothars decease shall pay unto John mott my Sonne twenty shillings if he demaund it in such pay as in ye place passeth for pay here amonge us

"Further I will them to pay to Adam mott there brother an Ewe lamb w'in twelve months after there mothers decease, allso I will to Elizabeth Thurston ye wife of Edward Thurston to be paid to hir or by whom shee shall assigne it unto one Ewe lamb a yere after there mothers departure

"Further whot she doth not use of howsehould goods or stock on ye grownd for hir owne suplyes in time of hir life, I doe desier my beloved frinds intrusted & Named Edward & Richard to perswade my wife at hir death in ye disposinge of movables with in howse or abraod to give it to them accordinge to discrecion whom beest deserves it in there Care & Respect to hir while she lives, upon which my dessier is you will have your Eyes as my Frinds, and harts Redey

"Lastly I leave my body to be Commited to ye Earth accordinge as thay and my wife sees good Levinge beuriasll it to be paid by whot she hath in hir hands, and after hir death I will ye the said Edward Thurston and Richard Tew Receve Each of them an Ewe sheep of ye stock delivred them w'in a month after there mothars departure in ye presents

"Writen & sealled and signed of Adam Mott before ye Executars delivred to Edward Thurston to be kepe in ye bahaulfe of both of them, Sealed the yere 1661) 1 of May

"Allso I give power to my Executors, full power to give to all and Every of my Children then livinge som gift of ye moveables Either or whot is in ye howse or abroud as they Can move or parswad hir According to there & hir discretion, if she be not willinge to give it w' discretion as they desarve, I then give full power to my afore said Executors Edward Thurston & Richard Tew to devide so much and as thay see meet amonge them all, Further if my Children should be Crosse to there mother so yt it should force hir to marey againe, I give full power to my Executors to take good & full securitie for the makinge good of ye Estate so longe as she lives that my will may be performed as is declared aforehand in my will that is to take bond of him, this on the backside wos writen before sealinge
A true copie of ye Origenall will of Adam mott
Copied by me richard Bulgar Town Clerke"

The Inventory of the estate of Adam Mott Senior deceased was taken on 12 August 1661 by William Baulston and John Portar (from The Early Records of the Town of Portsmouth, Providence R.I.: Rhode Island Historical Society, 1901), page 389-90, accessed on FHL Microfilm 0,945,382, Item 3, printed version).  The inventory of his estate totaled 371 pounds, 6 shillings, and included house and land (150 pounds), four oxen, five cows, a bull, a horse, one mare, a colt, two calves, thirty ewe sheep, two rams, six swine, 3 pounds in wampum peage, clothes, books, two feather beds, two flock beds, six pewter platters, a wine pot, warming pan, seven pair of sheets, six napkins, two tables, a joint stool, and one and one-half acres of wheat, two acres of oats, two acres of peas, and three acres of Indian corn.


On 31 August 1661, widow Sarah Mott brought her husbands will to the town office to be proved and the town council.  The Council found that some things were dubious since Sarah was not named the executrix of the will.  However, the Council unanimously appointed Sarah Mott, widow to the late deceased Adam Mott, to be the sole executrix during the term of her life according to what the Council understood the meaning of the will to be  (from The Early Records of the Town of Portsmouth, Providence R.I.: Rhode Island Historical Society, 1901), page 386, on FHL Microfilm 0,945,382, Item 3, printed version).

I note that Adam Mott really needed a spell checker!  

I also note that Adam named his second wife, Sarah, and six of his eight children in his will - Jacob, Gershom, Eleazer, John, Adam and Elizabeth Thurston.  

I descend from both of Adam Mott's wives - from Adam Mott and Elizabeth (Mott) Thurston by first wife Elizabeth, and from Jacob Mott by second wife Sarah.

The Portsmouth book contains both the original page images of the records and the transcriptions of the records.  I chose to trust the transcriptions rather than fight through the handwritten record.  Here are the images of the handwritten record:





The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2013/06/amanuensis-monday-probate-records-of.html

Copyright (c) 2013, Randall J. Seaver