Wednesday, January 12, 2011

(Not So) Wordless Wednesday - Post 135: A Pensive Emily

I'm posting family photographs from my collection on Wednesdays, but they won't be Wordless Wednesday posts like others do - I simply am incapable of having a wordless post.

Here is a photograph from the Seaver//Carringer family collection handed down by my mother in the 1988 to 2002 time period:


This is a photograph of Emily Kemp Auble in 1918 with a bow in her hair, posed with a vase of flowers on a simple stand.  My guess is that this was taken before her wedding on 19 June 1918 to Lyle Lawrence Carringer.  Lyle and Emily are my maternal grandparents.

I have very few pictures of Emily smiling.  She looks very pensive in this photograph, perhaps pondering her future as an 18-year old bride to a young United States Marine.  She doesn't know how her world will change over the next 59 years of her life, but it was mostly good and wonderful.  They had only one child and three grandchildren, but they loved them all in the very best way. 

I posted a biography, including this picture, of Emily Kemp (Auble) Carringer (1899-1977) in March 2009.

Updated:  Barbara kindly pointed out that I neglected to proof the post. I corrected "60" down to "59" and ended up with "659" in the initial text.  Thanks, Barbara!

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Creating Source Citations in Family Tree Maker 2011 - Post 2: Converting Free-form Sources to Template Sources

In Creating Source Citations in Family Tree Maker 2011 - Post 1, I described some of my challenges in creating "quality" source citations in my genealogy database using FTM 2011.

I want to convert my "master sources" (most of them created in Family Tree Maker 16 over the past 12 years) into "Source Groups" using the source templates that were developed according to Evidence! Explained principles.  If I do this well, then I won't have to duplicate my earlier efforts. 

For this example, which is typical of what I've done to date on this task, I'm going to convert the Carringer Family Bible "master source" from the free form style to the Template style.  The "free form source" reads:

"unknown, Carringer Family Bible (loose pages) (no publication information), Family files of Randall J. Seaver, 1154 Via Trieste, Chula Vista, California, USA 91911"

I copied this text to my clipboard before I did the following process:

1)  In the "Sources" Workspace, the list of "Source Groups" is on the left.  I selected and double-clicked on the "Carringer Family Bible" entry and the "Edit Source" box appeared over the middle panel.  In the lower right-hand panel is the text above:


In my "free form source," I had entries in the Title, the Publisher, the Source Repository and the Comments.  The "Source Template" field is empty. 

2)  I want to use an appropriate "Source template" so I clicked on the "Change" button and the "Select Source Template" box appeared:


The "Select Source Template" box wants me to select a "Source Group," "a "Category" and a "Template."  After looking through several of the options, I selected a "Source Group" = "Archives and Artifacts," a "Category" = "Private holdings" and a "Template" = "Family Bible Records" in the fields above.  The helpful note below the "Template" field provides a summary of what should go into this particular template.

3)  I clicked on the "OK button, and the "Change Source Type box appeared, which wants me to choose which of the template fields I want to use:


I decided to accept them all... noting that the "Existing template" item was checked, and clicked "OK." 

4)  The "Edit Source" box opened with the selected template fields, but they were empty.  Remember how I copied the previous "free form source" information into my clipboard?   I then pasted it into the "Comments" field at the bottom so that I could cut and paste elements into the template fields. 
I proceeded to put information into the template fields of the "Edit source" box:



After filling in the fields, I edited the "Comments" section.

5)  The "Edit Source" box looked like this:


OK, I'm done editing.  I clicked "OK" and the source was edited.  The "Source Group" screen for this specific Source Group looked like:


The "Source Citation" section of the middle panel shows one citation, with 11 "Links" in the lower part of the middle panel.  The "Source Group" citation reads:

"David Jackson Carringer, 1828-1946, Carringer Family Births, Marriages and Deaths (loose pages), unknown title (unknown location: unknown publisher, unknown date; before 1901); privately held by Randall J. Seaver, Chula Vista, California 91911, 1988-2011."

That one was fairly complicated - not all of them are, of course. 

For me, the key for this process was to copy my "free form source" information into the clipboard a temporary file of some sort so that it can be pasted into the Comments section to help me with the source template fields.  I learned from experience that once you've changed the source information, the previous "free form source" information was eliminated. 

I've changed some of my 640+ Source Groups from the "free form source" style to the "Source Template" style and it goes fairly quickly.

Disclosure:  I received a gratis copy of Family Tree Maker 2011 from Ancestry.com in November 2010.  I had purchased earlier versions of Family Tree Maker myself, but also received gratis copies of some versions from Ancestry.com (which I donated to a local genealogical society).  I try very hard to be objective in my comments about Family Tree Maker, and all genealogy software, subscription sites and websites.

Genea-Musings Top 20 Hits for 2010

Like other genea-bloggers, I'm curious about which posts on Genea-Musings are "popular" - and why they might be.

Here are the Top 20 blog posts that had the most page views in 2010 (from Google Analytics).  Of course, with almost five years and 4,500 posts, they were not all written in 2010:

1)  World records for number of children (posted 21 July 2006) - 5,610 views

2)  Family Tree Maker 2011 Announced (posted on 6 August 2010) - 3,536 views

3)  John Tyler's Grandson is still alive! (posted 20 February 2007) - 2,715 views

4)  How rare is your personality type? (posted 20 June 2007) - 1,522 views

5)  Tombstone Tuesday - Nathaniel Grigsby (posted 19 May 2009 ) - 1,521 views

6)  Want a genealogy job? FamilyLink is hiring! (posted 15 April 2009) - 1,352 views

7)  I'll wait on Family Tree Maker 2011 posted on 31 August 2010 - 1,239 views

8)  Make Your Own Gravestone (posted 29 July 2007) - 1,118 views

9)  New FamilySearch Record Search Databases - 300 million names! (posted 3 May 2010) - 986 views

10)  I'm Puzzled by DNA Claims on "Faces of America" (posted 4 March 2010) - 831 views

11)  Who has married the most times? (posted 24 June 2008) - 782 views

12)  Exporting a Tree from Ancestry.com (posted 9 July 2009) - 711 views

13)  Was Daniel Boone an Ancestor of Pat Boone? (posted 31 August 2007) - 690 views

14)  My mtDNA is in the K Haplogroup (posted 30 September 2008) - 676 views

15)  Is Robert Pattinson a Cousin to Vlad III Dracula? (posted 24 June 2010) - 6095 views

16)  Ancestry.com Offering 15% Savings on NEW Subscriptions (posted 4 July 2010) - 576 views

17)  Ancestry.com Source citations leave a lot to be desired (posted 14 May 2010) - 553 views

18)  "I Am My Own Grandpa" (posted 30 June 2006) - 516 views

19)  First Look at Archives.com - a Database Site? (posted 16 April 2010) - 512 views

20)  The 2010 Census Questions - and why they are asked (posted 9 March 2010) - 479 views

Twelve of these top 20 posts are "oldies but goodies" - posts that people find by using a search engine. The others are more recent posts, and the traffic for most of them peaks right after they are posted and dies down quickly.

Previous Top 20 "most popular" posts are:

*  2009:  Genea-Musings Statistics for 2009 - Post 2
*  2008:  Genea-Musings top posts - by page views

Tuesday's Tip - Find and Use Historical City Directories

This week's Tuesday's Tip is to find and use online and printed historical city directories to help you find residences, occupations and relationships of your ancestral families.

There are several websites to help you connect to online and printed City Directories:

1)  You can check http://www.uscitydirectories.com/ to determine if a given locality has published city directories and repositories that they might be found.

2)  Cyndi's List has a section at City Directories at http://www.cyndislist.com/citydir.htm with links to specific collections, articles about city directories, and more.

3)  Miriam Robbins Midkiff has an Online Historical Directories website at http://sites.google.com/site/onlinedirectorysite/.  There are links to free and commercial sites in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Ireland and Thailand at present.  This is a website still being built, but it has significant and very useful content.  It includes City Directories on http://www.ancestry.com/, but not on http://www.footnote.com/ at present.

4)  http://www.footnote.com/ ($$) has online City Directories (before 1924) for 31 cities in 20 states (see http://www.footnote.com/browse.php#44|-1 for list).

5)  http://www.donslist.net/ (free) has online City Directories for cities in 36 states, with significant collections for San Francisco, Rochester, Baltimore, Atlanta, Cincinnati and Pittsburgh. 

6)  Of course, local and regional libraries, and historical societies, usually have whole or partial collections of city directories on their shelves or on microform. 

UPDATED 2:40 p.m.  Corrected link to http://www.donslist.net/ (not .com).  Thanks, Anonymous!

Monday, January 10, 2011

GenSoftReviews Presents its User's Choice Awards

I received this press release from Louis Kessler, owner of the Genealogy software Reviews website, http://www.gensoftreviews.com/:


GenSoftReviews Presents its 2010 Users Choice Awards
Announcing the most liked genealogy programs for 2010.


January 10, 2011 -- GenSoftReviews has awarded its 2010 Users Choice Awards to the genealogy software that the users like best.

Genealogists have been coming to GenSoftReviews for over two years to review and rate their genealogy software. The site is located at: http://www.gensoftreviews.com/

With over 550 programs to choose from, it is not easy to pick what program is best to use for your family tree research. There is nothing better than to hear the opinions of others. At GenSoftReviews, people can search for the type of program they want or for a specific program they know of. They can then read reviews of others, and see how others rate each program on a one to five scale. Then they can feel free to add their own review and rating for the programs they use. The site is free to use and there is no registration needed to add your reviews.

After two years, over 720 reviews have been submitted. The end of year ratings for 2010 have now been tabulated and eight programs have been awarded a Users Choice Award. All the programs with a user rating of 4 or more out of 5 and at least 10 reviews are being awarded a GenSoftReviews Users Choice Award.

The 2010 winners
, ordered by highest rating are: RootsMagic, Brother's Keeper, The Next Generation, Genbox Family History, Legacy, Personal Ancestral File, Reunion and Family Tree Builder. The official awards page can be found at: www.gensoftreviews.com/awards.htm

Seven of these programs are repeat winners and also received award in 2009. Genbox Family History is a new winner this year, having now attained the ten reviews and a score of 4 or more necessary to qualify.


"Everybody is different and has different needs" says Louis Kessler who developed and maintains the site. "Choosing a genealogy program is like choosing a vacation hotel. What's best for one person is not necessarily best for another person. So its great to see people using GenSoftReviews to help them decide on their genealogy tool, just like they'd use a travel site with user ratings to help them decide on a hotel."

Louis offers his congratulations to all the winners. "Their software is really liked by their users."


###

About Louis Kessler

Louis Kessler has been a genealogist and programmer for 35 years. He has published articles and given presentations on genealogy and is Past President of a regional Heritage Center. He started his Genealogy Software Links web page in 1997 and that morphed into the GenSoftReview site in 2008. Louis is also the developer of the genealogy program known as Behold that can be found at http://www.beholdgenealogy.com/.

Contact Information

Louis Kessler
homep: www.lkessler.com
email: lkessler@lkessler.com

Footnote.com Subscription Special - $49.95

http://www.footnote.com/ is offering a one-year subscription for $49.95 (retail price is $79.95) - see the page at http://go.footnote.com/special/?p=allspecial&xid=971.  The offer extends to 31 January 2011.



The list of historical record collections at Footnote.com is provided at http://www.footnote.com/documents/ (the alphabetical list) and http://www.footnote.com/documents/?type=titles&start=0&sort=updated (the new and updated list).

Disclosure:  I have a paid subscription to http://www.footnote.com/.  I have not received any remuneration for writing this post.

Creating Source Citations in Family Tree Maker 2011 - Post 1: The Challenge

Creating source citations in my genealogy software has always been a problem for me, so I was happy that Family Tree Maker, RootsMagic, Legacy Family Tree and other programs have worked hard to provide source citation templates for users of the software.

However, my database has over 600 "master sources" and each has one or more (sometimes hundreds) of source citations that define a citation detail (e.g., a page number) or the citation text (a summary or transcription of the information in the source).  Every one of my "master sources" was created in the relatively simple FTM 16 software program, and often is just something like:

*  Carringer Family Bible (loose pages)

*  Westmnster MA Vital Records Book.

*  Barry, "History of Framingham, Mass."

Those are not standard source citations (author, title, publication information, etc.), but they worked for me and were fast to create.  Now I'm paying the price for my expediency.  In order to make my source citations useful, I need to create standardized sources as best I can.  My choice is to use the standardized source templates using one or more of the programs I have - Family Tree Maker 2011, RootsMagic 4 and Legacy Family Tree 7.  But I have to now transform my "shorthand source citations into "template sources."

Because I'm doing most of my database work at present in FTM 2011 (I had to choose one, and FTM 2011 seemed to do place standardization the easiest), I will concentrate on that program for now.  However, I'm not going to do too many of the "transformations" without evaluating the other two programs.  I want to see how easy each program is to create the sources using templates, and if sources from one program translate well into other programs.  I may choose to use one of them as my "selected program" at some time down the road. 

Family Tree Maker has made several tutorial videos to help users work with the program - you can see the list at http://www.familytreemaker.com/Pages/Tutorial/Tutorial.aspx (thanks to Tana L. Pedersen for the post
Family Tree Maker Tutorials today - very timely!).  The "Sourcing" tutorial presentation title page looks like this:



This video is about five minutes long, and Duff Wilson takes the viewer through the basic steps of creating a source and citation from scratch, and explores the different ways to create and access source citations.  Interestingly, he did not use the source creation template available in FTM 2011! 

The next post will describe the process I've used to turn a "shorthand source" into a "template source" in Family Tree Maker 2011.  Of course, the process will be different in other genealogy software programs.

Disclosure:  I received a gratis copy of Family Tree Maker 2011 from Ancestry.com in November 2010.  I had purchased earlier versions of Family Tree Maker myself, but also received gratis copies of some versions from Ancestry.com (which I donated to a local genealogical society).  I try very hard to be objective in my comments about Family Tree Maker, and all genealogy software, subscription sites and websites.

Amanuensis Monday - the Probate File of John Whitney (1621-1692) of Watertown, Massachusetts

Genea-blogger John Newmark (who writes the excellent TransylvanianDutch blog) started a Monday blog theme many months ago called Amanuensis Monday. What does "amanuensis" mean? John offers this definition:

"A person employed to write what another dictates or to copy what has been written by another."

The subject today is the probate file of John Whitney (1621-1692) of Watertown, Massachusetts.  He married Ruth Reynolds (1623-1706?) in 1642 and they had children John Whitney (1643-1727); Ruth Whitney (1645-1718); Nathaniel Whitney (1647-1733); Samuel Whitney (1648-1731); Mary Whitney (1650-1693?); Joseph Whitney (1653-1702); Sarah Whitney (1654-1720); Elizabeth Whitney (1656-1712); Hannah Whitney (1658-????); Benjamin Whitney (1660-1736).

The estate papers for John Whitney are in the Middlesex County [Massachusetts] Probate Records, Probate Packet 24,681 (on FHL Microfilm 0,432,081, image copy of original papers).  He left a will, which is very difficult to read in its original form, and which was ruled by the court as imperfect, presumably because of the conflicting bequests, alterations and conditions imposed on the heirs.  The imperfect will reads, in part, as follows (paragraphs separated for readability):

"I John Whitney Senior of Watertown in the County of Middlesex being perfect and sound disposing memory and understanding blessed be god ... to be my last will and testament, I commit my soul unto the hands of the ... god who gave it and my body to the earth.

"1.  I give and bequeath to my wife my dwelling house and barns so long as she remains my widow.  If she marry I give to my  .... 3 ... my ... and ... all my  land and all my  ... and 2 cows and my horse on yoke oxen all my  ... stuff beding and all ... in my house and barns and what mony ... left unsold away:  and she shall have pan.. at ... to her 5 daughters

"2.  I give to my son John Whitney or his son John if he not be living my dwelling house and my 23 acres

"3.  I give to my son Nathanell Whitney half my farme and half my medo in the west half my medo by John  ...  : he shall have lands ... of medow

"4.  I grant to my son Samuel half my farm and medo and half my medo at ye ... and grant him

"5.  I grant to my son Joseph Whitney my land at Stony Brook 14 acres more or less: with all the medo yt is in yt

"6.  I give to my son Bengamin all yt land that I bought of Thomas."

He named his wife and sons John and Benjamin to be his executors.  The last paragraph of the will says
"My will is if any of my sons or son in laws or daughters be quarelsom by going to law or troublesom to the brethren I say they shall lose the share of what I have bequeathed them.  I desire they should live in love to God and one toward anothr." 

John Whitney subscribed to this will in 1690, but it was not signed or sealed by anyone else.

Administration on the estate of John Whitney was granted to his widow Ruth and his sons John and Benjamin on 23 December 1692.  Bond of 500 pounds was obligated by Ruth Whitney relict widow, sons John and Benjamin Whitney, Munning Sawin and Joseph Whitney. 

An inventory, dated 26 October 1692 and accepted 23 November 1692, was taken by Elnathan Beers and Thomas Hammond.  The real property included 18 lots or parcels of land, amounting to about 210 acres, including one lot of 17 acres "purchased of father Arnold."  The real estate was appraised at 197 pounds 15 shillings.

The heirs drew up an agreement which reads:

"Articles of Agreement mutually Concluded & Agreed upon this 12th day of March Anno Dom 1692/3 By Ruth Whitney widow & Relict of John Whitney late of Watertowne Deceased And John Whitney Nathanll Whitney, Samuel Whitney, Joseph Whitney, & Benjamin Whitney Sons of said John Whitney Decd Also Enosh Lawrence, Daniel Herrington & Daniel Warren his sons in law & Mary & Hannah his Daughters unmarried Concerning & referring to ye settlement of the Estate of said John Whitney Deceased are as followeth:

"Imps:  That whereas ye abovesaid John Whitney Deced did leave at his death an imperfect will wherein he hath signified how he would that his estate should be disposed after his death, The persons abovenamed have mutually agreed & concluded that with ye alterations hereafter mentioned the aforesaid will shall be ye rule of the Division of said Estate.

"2  Whereas by said will John Whitney & Benjamin Whitney were enjoined to pay each of them ten pounds in Countrey pay to their five sisters in the space of ten yeares next after their mothers decease they do mutually agree that the same shall be paid in manner abovesaid in ten years from the date of these articles.  And whereas the five daughters of said John Whitney deced were by the said will to enjoy ye profits of ye orchard for five yeares from their mothers decease it is agreed they shall relinquish their claime thereto: In consideration whereof the said John & Benjamin shall each of them pay ten pounds in currant money to ye said five daughters in ten yeares from ye date abovesaid.

"3  Whereas also Nathanol Samuel & Joseph were by said will to pay their five sisters, each of them three, fifty shillings in five yeares after their mothers decease, it is agreed that it be paid to them in five years from ye date as above.

"4  It is also mutually agreed that Nathanael & Samuel shall have all ye meadow that lyes in the farme which did belong to their father John Whitney deced.

"5  Whereas the lands Devided amongst the sons are by said will Entailed, it is agreed that the said Entaile shall be put off or abated, & that ye said lands according as Devided shall be to them, their heirs & assigns for ever.

"6  Whereas by said will Nathanael & Samuel were enjoined to but make & to carry home to their mother each of them a load of hay yearly during her natural life it is mutually agreed that it shall be abated.

"Finally it is agreed that wth the Alterations above mentioned that the Will aforesaid be firme & valid to all intents & purposes whatsoever.

"In Witness to all & singular ye articles abovesaid, the persons abovementioned have herewith put their hands & seales the day & yeare abovementioned."

"Benjamn Whitney         The marke of Ruth Whitney
Phillip Shattuck
John Whitney
Attorney to Enosh  Lawrence

the marke of                  the marke of            Nathanael Whitney
Hannah Whitney           Mary Whitney

Daniel Herington        Joseph Whitney
Sary his wife"


The Court accepted the agreement on 6 May 1695, with a document which stated that they have "received and do acknowledge the receipt of all dues and demands that we have or justly might have right to" and "do hereby quit claiming to any further right in sd Estate from sd John & Benja Whitney Adminisrs."  This was signed by seven heirs (John, Benjamin, Joseph, William Shattuck for Phillip Shattuck, Mary, Hannah and Daniel Herrington) and by three witnesses, Saml Prookin, William Shattuck and Pelatiah Whittemore.  It was signed, sealed and approved by the court on 6 May 1695.

A final inventory and distribution of the estate (amounting to 274 pounds, 12 shillings, 10 pence), was made by the administrators and approved by the court on 27 May 1695.

*  The relict Ruth Whitney received 143 pounds, 14 shillings, 10 pence, including the homestall containing one house, barn and three acres of land, plus other parcels totalling 36 acres, and some of the personal estate.
*  Son John Whitney received, besides what was in remission, land and personal items valued at 22 pounds and 10 shillings,
*  Son Nathaniel Whitney received land valued at 22 pounds and 5 shillings,
*  Son Samuel Whitney received land valued at 22 pounds and 5 shillings,
*  Son Joseph Whitney received land and personal items valued at 22 pounds and 15 shillings,
*  Son Benjamin Whitney received land and husbandry utensils valued at 22 pounds and 10 shillings;
*  Ruth Whitney alias Larrance received 9 pounds and 10 shillings;
*  Mary Whitney received land valued at 10 pounds and 10 shillings;
*  Daniel Herrington and his wife Sarah received 10 pounds and 10 shillings;
*  Daniel Warren and his wife Elizabeth received 10 pounds and 10 shillings;
*  Hanna Whitney received land valued at 10 pounds and 10 shillings.

It was fortunate that the will was "imperfect" - the resulting probate record defines each child and the names of the spouses of the married daughters.

My own ancestral line is through the son, Nathaniel Whitrney (1647-1733). 

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Brick Wall Solutions: Was there a Name Change?

All genealogy researchers have "brick wall ancestors" - the ones that we know their names but cannot find their parents.  One reason for the brick wall may be that the person changed his name - intentionally, or by adoption.  What are the reasons for intentionally changing a name?  A bad reputation, a criminal record, a name associated with something bad, to escape from the law or the military, to commit bigamy, etc.  It was a lot easier before 1900 than it is now, of ocurse!

I have one of them - Devier James Lamphier who legally changed his name to Devier J. Smith in 1866, 25 years after his adoption.  One of Linda's ancestors - Elijah Pickrell McKnew - deserted the US Army in 1856 and showed up in the 1860 census in the California Gold country under the name of Elijah Pickrell; he used McKnew when he married and for the rest of his life.

Genea-blogger Randy Majors (http://www.randymajors.com/) recently emailed me saying:

" I wanted to let you know of a great brick wall that I recently solved and the narrative I wrote in the hopes that it will offer ideas for others to try:  "Unexpected Name-Change Brick Wall Solved", see here:
http://randymajors.com/2010/12/man-who-wasnt-john-charles-brown.html

"The post is about a 130 year-old brick wall related to my great grandfather, which included an unexpected name change.  It was solved using a combination of clues from oral tradition, nearly futile searches, desperate hunches, and finally, DNA testing."

Randy's work is well researched, the summary is well done (although it could use source citations), and the written conclusions are persuasive and convincing. 

I just added Randy's blog to my Google Reader today, and I recommend that you do too.

Now I'm wondering just which of my "disappearing dudes" (to use Debra Mieszala's term... - hers was also a name change) might have changed his name.  I have a good candidate - William Knapp (1775-1856) of New Jersey - in mind!  Unfortunately, I can't do DNA tests unless I can find a living male Knapp descendant of William's.

Thank you, Randy Majors, for the excellent read and great example.

Best of the Genea-Blogs - 2 January to 8 January 2011

Hundreds of genealogy and family history bloggers write thousands of posts every week about their research, their families, and their interests. I appreciate each one of them and their efforts.

My criteria for "Best of ..." are pretty simple - I pick posts that advance knowledge about genealogy and family history, address current genealogy issues, provide personal family history, are funny or are poignant. I don't list posts destined for the genealogy carnivals, or other meme submissions (but I do include summaries of them), or my own posts.

Here are my picks for great reads from the genealogy blogs for this past week:

*  Everyone's getting organized by Pat Richley-Erickson on DearMYRTLE's Genealogy Blog.  Pat compiled a list of geneabloggers who are organizing their stuff.

*  Get A Rope - Shades Out West 2011 by footnoteMaven on the Shades of the Departed blog.  The December issue of this fantastic online genealogy magazine is out - about the wild, wild West.

*  Uncovering the Stories of Immigrant Ancestors by Leslie Albrecht Huber on The Journey Takers blog.   Leslie provides tips for writing stories about immigrant ancestors.

*  Carnival of Genealogy, 101st Edition by Jasia on the Creative Gene blog.  There are 43 entries in this carnival on the theme of Our genealogy research/writing plans for 2011!

*  New FamilySearch, a view from the British Isles Part One and Part Two by Audrey Collins on The Family Recorder blog.  Audrey raises issues with the revamped FamilySearch site, especially relating to British Isles research.

*  The #1 Thing That Impacted My Research in 2010 by Marian Pierre-Louis on the Roots and Rambles blog.  Marian learned some lessons in 2010, and shares them with us.  Well said.

*  The Earlybird Catches the Worm by the writer of the Geniaus blog.  She was one of 1,000 that caught Thomas MacEntee's webinar on Google - which started at 6 a.m. local time.  Then she posted one of the first summaries about it.

*  Build a BetterGEDCOM or learn GEDCOMBetter? by Louis Kessler on the Louis Kessler's Behold! Blog.  Louis has a different take on the pluses and minuses of GEDCOM.  Read the comments too.

*  Adapting Boy Scout Law To Your Genealogy by Carol Yates Wilkerson on the iPentimento | Genealogy and History blog.  Carol provides some guidelines for genealogists modeled on Boy Scout Law.  Nicely done!

*  Mama and Me and Papa and Me by Lucie LeBlanc Consentino on the Lucie's Legacy blog.  This is all about Lucie's parents and Lucie's interaction with them - fascinating and priceless.

*  Genealogy Industry Predictions for 2011 by Thomas MacEntee on the Geneabloggers blog.  "Genea-Dixon" makes genealogy predictions in many categories.

*  Genealogy Videos: Family History in 3 Minutes by Amy Coffin on the We Tree blog.  Amy demonstrates that making family history videos is useful and pretty easy.

*  Article in KC Star, 23 Nov 2010 by Kathleen Brandt on the a3Genealogy blog.  Kathleen shares this article featuring genea-blogger Kathleen from her local newspaper.  Excellent!

*  A Few Pieces of Advice for Beginner Genealogists by Valerie Craft on the Begin with Craft blog.  A nice piece that will help for beginning researchers.

Several other genea-bloggers wrote weekly pick posts this week, including:

*  While You (and I) Were Out  by Diane Haddad on The Genealogy Insider blog. 

*  Donna’s Picks: January 7, 2011 by Donna Pointkouski on the What's Past is Prologue blog.

*  Follow Friday: Around the Blogosphere - January 7 by Susan Petersen on the Long Lost Relatives.net blog. 

*  Friday Newsletter and Follow News: 7 January 2011 by Greta Koehl on Greta's Genealogy Bog blog.

I encourage you to go to the blogs listed above and read their articles, and add their blog to your Favorites, Google Reader, RSS feed or email if you like what you read. Please make a comment to them also - all bloggers appreciate feedback on what they write.

Did I miss a great genealogy blog post? Tell me! I am currently reading posts from over 740 genealogy bloggers using Google Reader, but I still miss quite a few it seems.

Read past Best of the Genea-Blogs posts here.