I've been accused of being a "Source Citation Nazi" by email correspondents, which I deny! I do like well-crafted source citations, however.
I asked myself the question:
"Which website that provides census records does the best job at creating source citations?" The concept of "best" is subjective, of course, but I will choose to define "best" as the
Evidence! Explained source templates.
I chose the 1930 United States census entry for my grandfather, Lyle L. Carringer (1891-1976) who resided in San Diego, California in the 1930 U.S. Census. Here are my findings:
1) Ancestry.com (from collection):
Year: 1930; Census Place: San Diego, San Diego, California; Roll: 192; Page: 5A; Enumeration District: 116; Image: 688.0; FHL microfilm: 2339927.
When attached to a person (in a Ancestry Member Tree synced to Family Tree Maker 2012), from FTM 2012:
Ancestry.com, 1930 United States Federal Census (Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2002. Original data - United States of America, Bureau of the Census. Fifteenth Census of the United States, 1930. Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 1930. T626,)
2) FamilySearch.org:
"United States Census, 1930," index and images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/XC6N-3VZ : accessed 19 June 2012), Lyle L Carringer, San Diego, San Diego, California.
3) Fold3.com:
There is no crafted source citation. The image of the Source Information box is:
4) Archives.com:
There is no crafted source citation. The image of the Source Information is:
5) WorldVitalRecords.com:
There is no crafted source citation. The image of the Source Information is:
6) CensusRecords.com:
This site does not yet have the 1930 U.S. Census.
7) Evidence! Explained template:
A 1930 U.S. Census entry crafted by the census template in RootsMagic (Census: U.S. Federal (online images); using Ancestry.com image, developed from Evidence! Explained source templates) for the Lyle L. Carringer entry would be:
1930 United States Federal Census, San Diego County, California, population
schedule, San Diego City, enumeration district (ED) 116, sheet 5A, Dwelling
#142, Family #148, Lyle L. Carringer household; digital images,
Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 19 June 2012); citing
National Archives microfilm publication T626, Roll 192.
Conclusions:
1) None of the historical record collections creates a source citation crafted to
Evidence! Explained principles. It's not even close!
2) None of the source information in the historical record collections contains all of the elements required to craft an
Evidence! Explained style citation.
3) FamilySearch is the only record collection that puts a link to the specific census image in their source citation.
4) Any source citation created by the record providers and attached to a tree person will have to be edited in order to meet the
Evidence! Explained template standards.
5) Which historical record collection will be the first to include all of the source citation elements and craft source citations according to
Evidence! Explained templates?
Some readers may be asking "Why does this matter? As long as they provide some source information, you can craft it to your own standards."
My response is: "With many Ancestry Member Tree users happily accepting shaky leaf Hints, and with the new Source Box on FamilySearch.org (that can be used to attach a source to a person in the FamilySearch Family Tree), it matters a lot. Millions of poorly crafted 'source citations' will be attached to millions of persons in these trees. I think that the historical record collection providers should do source citations better, and should do them to a recognized standard."
What do you think? Am I being too hard on the providers? Are the
Evidence! Explained templates the best standard to aspire to?
The URL for this post is:
http://www.geneamusings.com/2012/06/which-site-provides-best-census-source.html
Copyright (c) 2012, Randall J. Seaver