Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Geni.com Tells Me i'm Related to Attila the Hun, Genghis Khan and Lady Godiva

I was working in Geni.com today and decided to check to see if I was related to some famous folks.  Bad folks...

1)  Attila the Hun...


Well, well, well Attila the Hun (406-453) is my 43rd great-grandfather.  Who knew?  I never imagined!  But..., someone born in 406 should be about 60 to 70 generations back in time, and this shows only 45 generations.

This is through my 9th great-grandfather, Edmund Hobart (1573-1646), an early settler of Hingham,  Massachusetts.  According to Geni.com, the Hobart line goes back to European royalty for many generations into the princes of Hungary.  Funny, I don't recall Edmund Hobart being on a list of "gateway ancestors" to European royalty, but perhaps it's true.

2)  Genghis Khan?  Who is supposedly the ancestor of a significant part of all of humankind?


Oh, good, Genghis Khan (1162-1227) is not my ancestor!  He is my 18th great uncle's great-aunt's husband great-grandfather.  That seems like a stretch.  It's only 29 generations (I think) back in time - I would expect someone born in 1162 to be 34 to 36 generations back.  Perhaps someone made a mistake.  Or I haven't extended my Geni.com lines far enough back to connect.

3)  How about Lady Godiva?  Oh, I wish...

It says that Lady Godiva (980-1067) is my 27th great-grandmother.  But, I would expect someone born in about 980 to be about 40 generations back, and this shows only 31 generations back.  Again, there seem to be missing generations.  

Oh well, that was fun, but I'm not holding my breath that any of these are correct.

I wish Geni.com and other sites with information like this looked critically at these lines.  


Copyright (c) 2015, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.


Dear Randy: Why Buy Genealogy Software When Online Trees are Available?

New Genea-Musings reader Roger asked this in an email recently:

"Ancestry.com, by all reviews, seems a fine program with a large database.  One pays for a monthly subscription and, if one wants information from Canada or from Europe, one has to purchase an additional subscription.  That perhaps, is the downside to the consumer.

"Other software programs like Legacy and RootsMagic, also get good reviews and on the surface, have a one-time purchase cost.
"Assuming money were not the factor, why would someone go the software program route as opposed to a web-based cloud application like Ancestry.com? (or any of the other free web-based programs).  I really am challenged in comprehending why the need to purchase software when the same or similar is already available on the web?

"The only answer I seem to hear is 'because why pay a monthly fee.'  If that really is the only answer, then so be it.  But with all the product out there, I can't help but feel that I am missing something in this storyline."

My response was lengthy, but perhaps other readers have wondered the same thing:

A)  The important thing to realize is that there are three different kinds of family tree "programs":

1)  Online separate "my" tree - Ancestry ($$), MyHeritage ($$), Findmypast ($$), etc. These are yours (but you can invite others to see it), are in the cloud, and are usually free to create a tree but require a subscription to search and find records.  They can be public or private.  They permit a GEDCOM upload or download.


2)  Online universal "our" tree - FamilySearch Family Tree, Geni ($$), WikiTree, etc.  These are not yours, are in the cloud and are either free or subscription.  Any registered user can add, change or delete information.  They are public.  FSFT and Geni don't permit a GEDCOM upload.


3)  Offline separate genealogy software tree - RootsMagic, Legacy Family Tree, Family Tree Maker, Family Tree Builder, many more.  These are "buy it once per version" programs that reside on your computer,  Some are free to download and use, but some of those have crippled features that are in the paid program  You download the program, and add content to it.  It is yours. The programs are much more comprehensive than the online programs - especially with reports, charts, sources, etc.  It is much easier to add names, relationships, dates, places, sources, media etc. to the offline programs than to the online programs.  These trees are private unless you choose to share the information.  All offline programs can import or export information using GEDCOM.


There is a process to import or export a data file using a GEDCOM (GEnealogy Data COMmunication) text format to transfer all or part of a tree in one form (online or offline) to another online or offline form.  If I want to export my RootsMagic software program data file, I can create a GEDCOM file in RootsMagic (export), and then I can import that file into Family Tree Maker, Ancestry, MyHeritage, or any other genealogy software program or website that will import a GEDCOM file.  However, the data transfer is not always perfect because each program or website won't import customized features from the export program.  

B)  Some of the offline genealogy software programs interact with online family tree sites.  For instance:

!)  A specific Family Tree Maker (FTM) database synchronizes with a specific Ancestry Member Tree (AMT).  If you change data in one or the other, or both, you can click on "Synchronize" in FTM to change the information in both the FTM database and the AMT to get them in sync. An AMT can also synchronize with the Ancestry mobile app.

2)  A specific Family Tree Builder software database synchronizes with a specific MyHeritage family tree.  The MyHeritage tree can synchronize with the MyHeritage mobile app.

3)  RootsMagic, Legacy Family Tree and Ancestral Quest can exchange information with the FamilySearch Family Tree (FSFT).  You can move information from one of those software programs to the FSFT, but not from any other software program.  The offline genealogy software programs usually have mobile apps that are static - the data can be changed out whenever desired, but they don't synchronize.

4)  Some of the offline software programs can access different online data providers.  FTM users can bring content directly into FTM from Ancestry.  RootsMagic users can see FamilySearch Record Hints and MyHeritage Record Matches but have to add the information by hand, not by direct import.

5)  There are mobile apps for Ancestry.com, MyHeritage and FamilySearch that are synchronized with a person's tree on the website.  Changes made on the mobile app are reflected in the online tree, and vice versa.  This is truly "my family tree in my pocket."

C)  With that as the background, "why pay a monthly fee" or a "one-time fee."  It's a user's choice.  Some reasons:

1)  Privacy.  "I don't want to share my information with anybody" or "I don't want anyone to steal it."  You choose to use an offline genealogy software program.

2)  Family only - "I want to share my tree only with my family."  You can do it by creating a GEDCOM file and share it with family via email, or in an online private family tree, and invite the family members to view it and add to it.

3)  "It's my tree and I want to find cousins online - I'm OK with sharing my information online, and I want to find others who are related to me."  So you put just what you want in a public online family tree,  You could use a bare-bones online tree, or a fully-leafed tree.  You could upload a GEDCOM file from an offline genealogy software program or create the tree within the online tree system, or build the online tree from scratch.

4)  "I want to share my information with everyone and be open to changes." You could add information to an online universal tree, and collaborate with others who share your ancestors and relatives.  

5)  Cost - some persons cannot afford to subscribe to a subscription data provider (e.g., Ancestry, MyHeritage, Findmypast, etc.), or don't want to pay for a subscription.  They use a free or purchased offline genealogy software program and build their family tree from collected records.  There are some researchers still using software programs created in the 1980s and 1990s that they judge to be "good enough." 

6)  Ease of Use - some researchers find it is much easier to add content (names, relationships, dates, places, notes, sources, media) to an offline genealogy software program than into an online family tree.  

7)  Offline Genealogy Software Programs have more capabilities than online tree systems.  This is especially true for charts, reports, book creation, lists, research logs, to-do lists, etc.

D)  In my case, because I write about all of the online family tree sites and some of the programs, I have both online and offline trees, but use RootsMagic 7 as my "master software" and export a GEDCOM file occasionally to the online trees or into other software programs.  

For instance, to add a new Ancestry Member Tree, I create a GEDCOM in RootsMagic, import it into FTM, then sync the FTM file with a new Ancestry Member Tree.  That process adds my person profiles, notes, sources and media into the Ancestry Member Tree.  

I use RootsMagic 7 to interchange information with the FamilySearch Family Tree, often creating new person profiles, adding and standardizing vital and other record data.  Occasionally, the FSFT has more information about a person than I have, and I add that information if it is sourced.

In my preferred process, I use the Ancestry Hints, the MyHeritage Record Matches, the FamilySearch Record Hints, etc. to add information to my RootsMagic 7 software database.  

I regularly save my RootsMagic 7 database to Dropbox and Google Drive as a backup, and can import it into RootsMagic and other programs on my laptop computer.  

I find it much easier to add content (names, relationships, dates, etc.) to the offline genealogy software programs than to an online family tree.  I greatly appreciate the chart, report, list, and research log capabilities of the genealogy software programs.  

E)  In the end, you need to do what's best for you - it's OK to have only an online tree, or only a genealogy software tree.  Or trees on many online sites or in many software programs.  Or on paper.  It's your tree.  If you don't want to share, it's OK.  And vice versa.  The problem is keeping more than one tree up to date.

At some time you realize that you want your research efforts to be available for posterity, and you write "books" and/or a blog, or create your own family tree website, or create a large family tree chart.  The content for these are usually created with an offline genealogy software program..  

The URL for this post is:  

Copyright (c) 2015, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.


Monday, November 9, 2015

Elizabeth Blanchard and Frederick Blanchard Death Notices on GenealogyBank - UPDATED

This morning's Mondays With Myrt Hangout on Air highlighted military veterans, especially those who were in our extended families.  I discussed my first cousin twice removed, Kenneth Blanchard (1891-1918), whom I never knew.  I highlighted two of my earlier posts which were found essentially by luck:

*  The "Forrest Gump Principle of Genealogy Research" strikes again (posted 18 December 2008).

*  Amanuensis Monday: "Tribute Paid to Hero's Worth" - Kenneth L. Blanchard (posted 30 May 2011)

I also posted Tombstone Tuesday - the Blanchards on 16 December 2008 having found the gravestones of Frederick and Elizabeth Blanchard.

I checked my database to see if I had a newspaper obituary or death notice for Frederick G. Blanchard (1847-1926) and Elizabeth L. (Seaver) Blanchard (1859-1914).  Elizabeth is my great-grandaunt, the sister of my great-grandfather, Frank Walton Seaver (1852-1922).

I found a death notice for Elizabeth Blanchard in the 11 March 1914 issue of the San Diego Tribune newspaper on GenealogyBank:


I transcribed the death notice today:

Mrs. Elizabeth L. Blanchard, wife of F.G. Blanchard, died last evening at 8 o'clock at her home on Nineteenth street, near D avenue, after a serious illness of sixteen weeks.  She was the mother of Frederick T. Blanchard,, of Berkeley, Cal., and Laurence C. and Kenneth L. Blanchard of National City.  She was formerly of Massachusetts, coming to National City about 25 years ago.  She was 54 years of age.  The announcement of funeral services will be made later by Johnson, Connell and Saum.

This death notice gave me a death date, which I subsequently found in the California Death Index, 1905-1939 on Ancestry.com.

UPDATE:

I received an email from Peter who sent me an image for Frederick Blanchard's death notice in the San Diego Evening Tribune, dated 29 January 1926:


The death notice reads:

BLANCHARD, FREDERICK G. -- Jan. 28, 1926, aged 78 years.

Reader Kathy did a broader search than I did - she searched all of California with the names, year 1926, and no keywords.  I used a keyword entry of "national city" because I couldn't think of that being left out.  A dumb error.  Thanks, Kathy!

I searched for an obituary or death notice for her husband, Frederick G. Blanchard, who died 27 January 1926 in National City.  I did not find one, even though I tried some of Kenneth Marks' "tricks" like using only part of a name in case the name was hyphenated.  I also tried just a first name and the words "died" or "passed" as a keyword.

\Oh well - I am happy I found Elizabeth's notice, and perhaps I'll run across more information about Frederick at another time.  and disappointed that Frederick didn't have a real obituary to memorialize his life.


Copyright (c) 2015, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.




New or Updated Record Collections at FamilySearch.org - November 1 to 7, 2015

I'm trying to keep up with the new and updated record collections at FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/list).  

As of 8 November 2015, there were 2,047 record collections on FamilySearch (an increase of 4 from last week):


The new or updated collections are:


*  United Kingdom, World War I Women's Army Auxiliary Corps Records, 1917-1920; Browse Images only, no index, added or updated 06 Nov 2015

*  North Carolina Estate Files, 1663-1979; 207,964 indexed records with record images, added or updated 04 Nov 2015

*  New Zealand, Auckland, Port Albert, Membership Lists and Minutes from the Church of Christ, 1875-1926; Browse Images only, no index, added or updated 04 Nov 2015

*  Philippines Civil Registration (Archives Division), 1902-1945; Browse Images only, no index, added or updated 04 Nov 2015

*  Brazil, Santa Catarina, Catholic Church Records, 1714-1977; 171,274 indexed records with record images, added or updated 04 Nov 2015

*  Delaware Vital Records, 1650-1974; 624,395 indexed records with record images, added or updated 04 Nov 2015

*  Spain, Province of Barcelona, Municipal Records, 1387-1986; 895,228 indexed records with record images, added or updated 03 Nov 2015

*  Italy, Imperia, Ventimiglia, Civil Registration (State Archive), 1806-1913; Browse Images only, no index, added or updated 03 Nov 2015

*  Slovakia, Census, 1869; Browse Images only, no index, added or updated 03 Nov 2015

*  Italy, Forlì-Cesena, Forlì, Civil Registration (State Archive), 1800-1815, 1866-1930; Browse Images only, no index, added or updated 03 Nov 2015

*  Iowa, County Death Records, 1880-1992; 543,429 indexed records with no record images, added or updated 03 Nov 2015

*  Ecuador, Catholic Church Records, 1565-2011; 267,440 indexed records with record images, added or updated 03 Nov 2015

*  Peru, Puno, Civil Registration, 1890-2005; 722,263 indexed records with record images, added or updated 03 Nov 2015


Unfortunately, it is difficult to tell which collections are brand new and which ones are updated.  The asterisk they use is for "Recently added or updated."  I am particularly interested in new collections, for the obvious reasons.

In order to select a specific collection, go to 
https://familysearch.org/search/collection/list and use the "Filter by collection name" feature in the upper left-hand corner.

Each one of the collections listed above has a Research Wiki page (use the "Learn more" link).  It would be very useful if the Wiki page for each collection listed the dates for when the collection was added as a new collection and the dates for major updates also.

The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2015/11/new-or-updated-record-collections-at_9.html

Copyright (c) 2015, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.

Amanuensis Monday - Post #293: 1722 Will of William Cutter (1649-1723) of Cambridge, Mass.

Genea-blogger John Newmark (who writes the excellent  TransylvanianDutch blog) started a Monday blog theme years ago called "Amanuensis Monday."  John offers this definition for "amanuensis:" 

"A person employed to write what another dictates or to copy what has been written by another."

The subject today is the 1722 will and probate records for William Cutter (1649-1723) of Cambridge, Middlesex County, Massachusetts:


The transcription of the will is (transcribed line by line):

In the Name of God Amen this first day of June in the year 1722, I William Cutter of Cambridge in the county
of Mid'x in the provence of the Massachusetts Bay in New England yeoman, being of Perfect mind and memory, Praise be
to Almighty God, Do make and Ordain this my Last Will and Testament in manner and form as followeth. First and
Principally I do commend my Soul into the hands of God Almighty, hoping throgh the Merritts death and passion
of My Saviour Jesus Christ to Obtain full and free pardon of all my sins And to inherit Eternall Life, and my Body I commit
to the earth to be Buried at the Decresion of my Executors hereafter mentioned. And as touching my Temporal Estate which almighty
God has bestowed on me, I Give and Depose as followeth. First, that all my Just Debts and funerall Charges be paid and discharged.
Item I Give to my dear and loving Wife Rebeckah Cutter the full improvement of a third part of my lands, and the Est end of my now
Dwelling house during her Natural Life, and a third part of my moveable Estate to be at her own despose for ever.
Item My will is that my four sons, Richard Cutter, John Cutter, William Cutter and Samuel Cutter have all my home lands lying both in
Cambridge and Charlstown to be Divided equally amongst them according to quantity and quallity, and what I have given
by a deed of Gift unto my son Richard shall be accounted as part of his proportion of land, and I give to my son Richard my
Barns and I give him my dwelling house after the decease of my wife, and my will is that my lands shall be so divided as shall
be made commodious and convenient to their houses, and that my son William Shall Choose his house lot in my land
Lying in the Bounds of Charlstown and adjoyning to my home place. And that all my Other lands uplands and mea-
dows lying in Charlstown Cambridge and Lexington be divided into four parts to each of my above sd sons thir equal
part of quantity and quality. All which I Give to my above sd Sons and to their heirs and assigns for ever they pay-
ing the Leagacies hereafter mentioned and performing the things. Item my will is that my house-plot Lying in Cambridge
that I bought of Cousin Chamney shall be to my youngest Son, viz.: Ammi Ruhamah Cutter (which with the Learning
I bestow on him Shall be the full of his portion) which sd house-plot I give to him and his heirs and assigns forever, and my
Will is that my Executors hereafter Named shall provide and at thir equal Cost aford suitable maintenance for the
bringing up my son Ammi Ruhamah through the Schools of learning until he take his Second Degree in the Colledge, and
afford or give to him so many Books as shall be thought necessary by the president or fellows of the Colledge, and I
give him a young horse fit for riding when he has commenced Master of the value thirof out of personall Estate.
And I Give to my Son William Cutter that part of sd meadow which I bought of my brother Ephriam Cutter, and the other three
acres more or less which was my Fathers to be Divided between my other three Sons, viz. Richard, John and Samuel; there
equal part. And my Will is that my Mills now standing on my homested together with all the previledges
and apurtenances and utencils therto belonging be divided as followeth. I confirm unto my Son John Cutter the
fourth part which I conveyed unto him by a deed, and it is my will that the other three quarters be divided between
my other three sons to each a equal quarter, viz. Richard, William and Samuel
Item I Give to my Daughter Elizabeth Herington Forty Shillings. And I give unto her Children Fourty eight Pounds to
be divided Equally amoungst them, and paid by my Executors to each wone as he or she shall come of age, which
with what I have formerly Given Shall be the full of her and her heirs portion.
Item I Give to my Daughter Hannah Winshipp fifty pounds to be paid at two payments – twentty pounds within a year after my
Decease, and thirtty pounds more within three year after my Decease which with what I gave her formerly is her portion.
Item I Give to my Son in Law Joseph Adams twenty pounds to be paid by my Executors within two years after
My decease, and I Give to his Children born of my Daughter Rebackah (his first wife now deceased) Thirtty pounds
to be equally divided and paid to them as they come of age - by my Executors – which with what I formerly have
given shall be the full of thir portion.
Item I Give to my Daughter Sarah Cutter Eighty Pounds, to be paid by Executors, Twenty Pounds to be paid at her
Marriing and Sixty Pounds more within five years after my decease which shall be her and her heirs full portion.
And my will is that in the divisions of my Sons Lands they Shall have a due respect for each others conveniency, and if any
of my sons shall see cause to sell any of thir land they shall give the refusall therof to their brethren and any such Son neglecting
so to do shall forfit such land or the value therof.
And my Will is that if any of my Children or of my Sons in Law Shall Enter into a cause of law to brake and make
Void this my Last Will and Testament they or any of them Shall Hierby forfit all right to any of my Estate, and that
my body be decently buried in the Buriing place in Cambridge. And I Do Nominate my dear and loving wife Execut-
rix and my sons Richard Cutter, John Cutter, William Cutter and Samuel Cutter Executors of this my last will and Testam't
and do hereby disannull Revoke and make void all other and former Wills and Testaments by me made heretofore. In Witness
hereof I the sd William Cutter have set to my hand and seal the day and year above written being the Eight'th year of the
Reign of our sovereign Lord Gorge by the grace of God of Great Britain France and Ireland King &c.
Signed Sealed and Declared
in presents of us
Jno Bordman   } sworn                                                       William Cutter {seal}
Simon Holden } in the country service, but 1 other 2 swore also
John Smith      } sworn
                                          April 29 1723
                                 Present the widow and all the Children (Sons)
                                 herein named Except Richard (the Eldest Son)
                                 John Herington (who married Eliza) a Daughter
                                 and Jn'o. Will'm & Sam'l Consent their mother shall receve
                                 her Thirds in ther moveables without any Deductions, the ???? ??????????

The source citation of this document is:

"Middlesex County, MA: Probate Papers, 1648-1871," digital image, American Ancestors (http://www.AmericanAncestors.org : accessed 19 December 2014), Estate File 5,669 (13 pages), page 12, William Cutter will, written 1 June 1722, proved 29 April 1723; original records in Middlesex County, Massachusetts Probate Court, Cambridge, Mass.

William Cutter (1649-1723) and Rebecca (Rolfe) Cutter (1662-1751) had ten children, nine of whom lived to adulthood and marriage.  Sons Richard, John, William, Samuel and Ammi Ruhamah are mentioned, as are daughters Elizabeth and husband John Herington, Hannah (wife of Ephraim) Winship, Rebecca (deceased wife of Joseph Adams), and Sarah Cutter (future wife of Ebenezer Cutter).  Bequests were made to the children of Elizabeth, Hannah, Rebecca, but they were not named.  

The most interesting feature of this will is the provision for the youngest son, Ammi Ruhamah Cutter (1705-1746).  His father gives him the home lot in Cambrdige and the means to obtain two degrees at the College (certainly Harvard).  

The probate packet has four pages of moveables Inventory and signed receipts by the sons-in-law and Ammi.  There is no real estate inventory and no account in the estate packet.  

I am descended through the eldest son, Richard Cutter (1682-1756), who married (1) Mary Pike (1687-1721) in 1706, and (2) Mercy Kelsey (1698-1760) in about 1722.  I descend from Richard and Mercy (Kelsey) Cutter's oldest son, William Cutter (1723-1780).  Richard Cutter moved to Woodbridge, Middlesex County, New Jersey before 1706.


Copyright (c) 2015, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.

Sunday, November 8, 2015

Added or Updated Databases at Ancestry.com - Week of November 1 to 7, 2015



The following databases were added or updated on Ancestry.com during the period from 1 to 7 November 2015:


The databases added or updated include:

*  Tasmania, Reports of Crime, 1861-1883; indexed database with record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  UK, Naturalisation Certificates and Declarations, 1870-1912;  indexed database with record images, UPDATED 11/6/2015

*  Austrian Jews in Concentration Camps, 1939-1945; indexed database with no record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  GÅ‚uszyca, Poland, Repatriated Polish Jews, 1946-1950; indexed database with no record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  Berlin, Germany, Jewish Forced Labor, 1941-1943; indexed database with no record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  Tulare County, California, Sheriff's Office and Jail Records, 1874-1963; indexed database with record images, ADDED 11/6/2015


*  Ukraine, Jewish Partisans and Fighters of Volyn, 1943-1944; indexed database with no record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  France, Deportations of Germans, Swiss and Austrians, 1940-1945; indexed database with no record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  Greece, S.S. Astir Passenger Manifest, 1939; indexed database with no record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  Mauritius, Danzig and Polish National Refugees, 1940; indexed database with no record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  Dachau, Germany, Jewish Deaths after Liberation, 1945; indexed database with no record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  Poland, Silesian Jews in Mixed Marriages, 1944; indexed database with no record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  Germany, Baden Jews, 1940; indexed database with no record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  Surrey, England, Regimental Rolls, 1914-1947; indexed database with record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  Romania, Census of the Jewish Population Living in Podu Iloaiei, 1898; indexed database with no record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  Italy, German Jews Deported to Auschwitz, 1943-1944; indexed database with no record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  Romania, Jewish Men in Battalion 120, 1941-1944; indexed database with record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  Bergen, Germany, Lost Train from Bergen-Belsen to Tröbitz, 1945; indexed database with no record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  Lieberose, Germany, Jewish Residents sent to Sachsenhausen, 1943-1945; indexed database with no record images, ADDED 11/6/2015


*  Germany, Hungarian Jewish Survivors in Buchenwald, 1945; indexed database with no record images, ADDED 11/6/2015

*  Web: Wabash Valley, Indiana, Obituary Index, 1900-2013; indexed database with no record images, UPDATED 11/5/2015

*  Illinois, Select United Methodist Church Records, 1824-2009; indexed database with record images, UPDATED 11/5/2015

*  UK, WWII Civil Defence Gallantry Awards, 1940-1949; indexed database with record images, ADDED 11/4/2015

*  Noord-Holland, Netherlands, Civil Registration, 1811-1950; indexed database with record images, UPDATED 11/4/2015

*  Quebec, Genealogical Dictionary of Canadian Families (Tanguay Collection), 1608-1890; indexed database with record images, UPDATED 11/4/2015

*  Australasia, Medical Directories, 1883-1915; indexed database with record images, ADDED 11/3/2015

*  Washington, D.C., Wills and Probate Records, 1737-1952; indexed database with record images, UPDATED 11/2/2015

The recently added and updated page on Ancestry.com is at http://www.ancestry.com/cs/recent-collections.

The complete Ancestry.com Card Catalog is at  http://search.ancestry.com/search/CardCatalog.aspx. 
 

By my count above there were 22 NEW databases ADDED this past week, per the list above. There are now 32,400 databases available as of 7 November, up 22 from last week.  


The URL for this post is:  http://www.geneamusings.com/2015/11/added-or-updated-databases-at_8.html


Copyright (c) 2015, Randall J. Seaver


Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.


Best of the Genea-Blogs - 1-7 November 2015

Hundreds of genealogy and family history bloggers write thousands of posts every week about their research, their families, and their interests. I appreciate each one of them and their efforts.


My criteria for "Best of ..." are pretty simple - I pick posts that advance knowledge about genealogy and family history, address current genealogy issues, provide personal family history, are funny or are poignant. I don't list posts destined for daily blog prompts or meme submissions (but I do include summaries of them), or my own posts.

Here are my picks for great reads from the genealogy blogs for this past week:


*  Review of 1939 English and Welsh Register Release and More On FindmyPast's 1939 National Register for England and Wales by Chris Paton on The British GENES Blog.  Chris reviews this important record collection.

*  In Search of a Bond With My 20th Great-Grandmother by Laura Hedgecock on the Treasure Chest of Memories blog.  Laura describes her feelings of a visit to Lincoln Cathedral.

*  Hunting for Cousins in England's 1939 Register by Liz Loveland on the My Adventures in Genealogy blog.  Liz used coupons to find some of her target families in the 1939 Register.

*  5 Photos You Should Take at the Cemetery by Amy Johnson Crow on the Amy Johnson Crow blog.  Amy has excellent suggestions.

*  6 Sources That May Name Your Ancestor's Parents by Lisa Louise Cooke on Lisa Louise Cooke's Genealogy Gems blog.  A nice list.

*  What is the Future of Genealogy Blogs? by James Tanner on the Genealogy's Star blog.  James observes and opines.  Do you agree?

*  The True Future of Blogging by Pat Richley-Erickson on the DearMYRTLE Genealogy Blog.  Myrt provides some history and opines on the future.

*  What Genealogy Will Your Children and Grandchildren Do If You Have Finished it All? by Wayne Shepheard on the Discover Genealogy blog.  Good question.  Wayne has some answers.

*  Prepare Before a Visit to the Family History Library by Linda Stufflebean on the Empty Branches on the Family Tree blog.  Excellent suggestions.

*  50 Gifts for Genealogists - 2015 by Diane Boumenot on the One Rhode Island Family blog.  Ah, my wish list!

*  Introducing Search Connect[TM] - Every Search is Now a Record! by Esther on the MyHeritage Blog.  This new feature may prove very useful.

*  The Glass Eye, Memories Fade, Records Preserve by Jay H. Fonkert on the Four Generations Genealogy blog.  Jay remembers things about his grandfather, but he found records to support the memories.

*  Digging Up Death Data by Larru Naukam on The In-Depth Genealogist blog.  Larry discusses death notices, obituaries, etc.

*  Exploring the New Ancestry.com DNA Feature: Total cMs by Kitty Cooper on Kitty Cooper's Blog.  Kitty shows how to find this information.

*  Ancestry's New "Amount of Shared DNA" - What Does It Mean? by Roberta J. Estes on the DNAeXplained -- Genetic Genealogy blog.  More on the AncestryDNA Shared DNA results.

Here are pick posts by other geneabloggers this week:

*  Recommended Reads by Linda Stufflebean on the Empty Branches on the Family Tree blog.

*  GAGs - GeniAus' Gems - 6 November 2015 by Jill Ball on the GeniAus blog.


*  Friday Finds Oct 31 - Nov 6 by Nichelle Barra on the Copper Leaf Genealogy blog.


*  Follow Friday ~ Fab Finds for November 6, 2015 by Jana Last on Jana's Genealogy and Family History Blog.


*  This Week's Creme de la Creme -- November 7, 2015 by Gail Dever on the Genealogy a la Carte blog.


*  Saturday Serendipity (November 7, 2015)  by John D. Tew on the Filiopietism Prism blog.

Readers are encouraged to go to the blogs listed above and read their articles, and add their blogs to your Favorites, Feedly, another RSS feed, or email if you like what you read. Please make a comment to them also - all bloggers appreciate feedback on what they write.

Did I miss a great genealogy blog post? Tell me! I am currently reading posts from over 1590 genealogy bloggers using Feedly, but I still miss quite a few it seems.


Read past Best of the Genea-Blogs posts here.


The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2015/11/best-of-genea-blogs-1-7-november-2015.html


Copyright (c) 2015, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.