Sunday, March 15, 2009

Emily Kemp (Auble) Carringer (1899-1977)

Emily Kemp Auble was born 19 August 1899 in Chicago, Cook County, Illinois to Charles and Georgianna (Kemp) Auble. She was an only child. Charles Auble was a painter (artwork? houses? I think houses, but I don't know!). Here is the only baby picture I have of Emily:


In about 1910, the family moved to San Diego from Chicago - Georgianna's brother Franklin Kemp was living in San Diego, apparently.

The family resided at 767 14th Avenue in San Diego for several years. Emily attended San Diego High School, but left school after her father died in 1916 after falling down stairs in the house. She worked to support her mother, and met young Lyle Carringer while working at Marston's.

This picture is of Emily just before her wedding to Lyle Carringer on 19 June 1918:


Lyle and Emily were married at the Central Christian Church in San Diego by the Rev. W.E. Crabtree, with only the immediate families present. After their marriage, they lived at 2054 Harrison Street in San Diego, where their daughter Betty was born on 30 July 1919.

In the 1920 U.S. census, this family resided at 2054 Harrison Avenue in San Diego, San Diego County, California (National Archives Microfilm Series T625, Roll 132, Page 179, ED 341, Sheet 3B, taken 5 January 1920). The family included:

* Lyle L. Carringer -- head, rents, male, white, age 28, married, can read, can write, born CA, father born PA, mother born KS, an auditor in a dry goods store, a worker
* Emily K. Carringer -- wife, female, white, age 20, married, can read, can write, born IL, father born NJ, mother born Canada
* Betty Carringer -- daughter, female, white, age 5 months, born CA, father born CA, mother born IL
* Georgia K. Auble -- mother-in-law, female, white, age 50, a widow, born in Canada, parents born Canada, immigrated in 1889, naturalized in 1898.

In 1920, the family built and then moved into a house at 2130 Fern Street in San Diego, on the same block as Lyle's parents. Lyle borrowed money from his parents to build the house, and Betty remembers the mortgage was $21.10 per month. Emily worked at Marston's for several periods between 1920 and 1940.

Emily's daily life as a wife and a mother was probably very typical for the time period - a housewife shopped for groceries and supplies daily, cooked for the family, cleaned the house, made, bought and/or mended clothes, washed the clothes, swept the walks, worked in the garden, took care of her daughter, read for pleasure, loved her husband, went out once in awhile to movies, galleries or the park, etc. The 1930's were not an especially hard time for this family because Lyle kept his job at Marston's Department Store.

Here is a picture of Emily and Betty (my mother) taken in about 1930:


Betty graduated from San Diego High School in 1936, and from San Diego State College in 1940 as a teacher. She continued to live at home until she married Fred Seaver in 1942. Their son, Randy, was born in 1943 and Betty and Randy moved back to the 2130 Fern Street house when Fred went into the U.S. Navy in 1944.

This is a picture of Emily and Lyle, and Emily's mother Georgianna (Kemp) Auble, with Emily's cousins, Will and Bessie Pentecost, taken in about 1945.


Lyle inherited all of the family property on the block (6 units) when his mother died in 1944 and his father died in 1946. The gardens on the property had plants, vegetables, berry bushes and fruit trees. There was a large greenhouse on the 2130 Fern Street property. Lyle and Emily moved into 2115 30th Street (the downstairs flat) in 1947 and the Fred Seaver family moved into the upstairs flat at 2119 30th Street.

Lyle and Emily sold the 2130 Fern Street property (lots 5, 6 and 7 in block 61 of Seaman & Choate's Addition on Map 631, except the westerly 29 feet thereof) on 25 September 1950 to John M. and Leona E. Smith for $8,850, who subsequently sold the property to William Phillips. Lyle and Emily also sold the south lot (the south 20 feet of Lot 10 and all of Lots 11 and 12) for $9,000 to Glenn Glasford on 16 November 1950, who built apartment houses on the property.

On 24 August 1950, Lyle and Emily purchased a triangular lot on Point Loma at the intersection of Armada Terrace and Harbor View Place (identified as Lots 14 and 15 in Block 4 of Ironton according to Map 689, the address was 825 Harbor View Place) from Edmund and Eleanor Pieper for $3,750 (Grant Deed recorded in Book 3759, Page 119). They built a unique and beautiful two bedroom redwood home overlooking San Diego Bay with a fantastic view of the City, San Diego Bay, North Island and points south, and the mountains to the east. They planted fruit trees and many colorful shrubs on the terraced land below the house.

This is a photograph of Lyle and Emily taken in about 1970.


Emily was a housewife and loved gardening and flower arranging. She was a member of the San Diego Floral Association and the Flower Guild Arrangers of San Diego. She entered many floral arrangement competitions and was a master judge of flower arrangements for the National Council of State Gardens Club. She was also a member of the Point Loma Assembly and Ikebana International. She was a prim, proper, happy, optimistic, loving, warm and gentle person who enjoyed being with friends and family.

She suffered a stroke in the 1960's but seemed to recover quickly, and lost quite a bit of weight. Emily suffered from Alzheimer's disease in the 1970's, and died following a stroke at home on 19 June 1977. She is inurned at Cypress View Mausoleum (Bronze Corridor, Niche 60) in San Diego, CA.

I have so many wonderful memories of, and deep feelings about, this Very Important Person in my life. They include:

* She took care of me daily during World War II (1944 to early 1946) when my father was in the U.S. Navy and my mother was teaching school. She was probably the one who saw my first step and heard my first words. I always felt very close to her, more so than my two brothers did, for this reason.

* When I was a young boy, Lyle and Emily lived downstairs from us, and I often visited them, went to the Piggly Wiggly store two blocks away with her, and loved playing in her fenced-in gardens by her house. She was the one who supervised our berry picking and lemonade selling ventures.

* When Lyle (Gramp) and Emily (Gram) moved to Point Loma in 1951, their home became my second home. Their grandsons have fond memories of many Christmas Eves spent bedded down in the spare bedroom, singing Christmas carols, and falling asleep before Santa Claus came. We always went to their house on the Fourth of July to watch the fireworks over San Diego Bay.

* She always encouraged me to do well in school, to learn about San Diego, and to play fair and do my best. My youth years were not wonderful from a peer standpoint because I was small, wore glasses and was not adept in sports or mechanical things. She was sort of my "secret friend" I could talk to about things.

* After Linda and I married in 1970, we didn't visit Lyle and Emily as much as before. There were the holiday events, but we were just "too busy" to visit more than occasionally. When Lyle died in 1976, we started taking my mother over to the house to help Emily with basic things (my father refused to go because she would berate him - the Alzheimers) and to check on her. It was on one of these visits that we found her on the floor, near death, after a stroke. The sight is seared in my memory - it was so hard to see this lovely woman in that way. My eyes still tear up over the memory. She died that night in the hospital.

Other than my wife and mother, Emily Kemp (Auble) Carringer was the person I loved the most throughout the first 33 years of my life. I so appreciate the legacy that she left me - especially the memories of a life well lived and the wonderfully diverse heritage - mainly colonial 17th century English in Massachusetts, New York and New Jersey, colonial 18th century German immigrants to New Jersey, a small colonial Dutch line in New York and a mystery French Canadian line. Thank you, Gram! for making my life so good and my genealogy work so interesting!

Lifting the Skirt on Genseek.com


We are getting a little more advance publicity and information about http://www.genseek.com/ - the site "coming soon" to be:

"We think GenSeek will become the world’s largest gateway to family history content,” explained Steve Nickle, President [of FamilyLink.com]. “Combined with our family social networks, it will make it easier than ever before for family members to explore and share their heritage with all of their relatives. Our historic partnership with FamilySearch Catalog will enable us to launch GenSeek.com with links to millions of the world’s most valuable genealogy sources.” (from a press release, see it at Leland's GenealogyBlog here.)

I posted over a month ago about this site in A Sneak Peek at Genseek.com which had a link to Tamura Jones's article about the site with screen shots.

I listened to Lisa Louise Cooke's Genealogy Gems Podcast #61 today while writing a blog post (multi-tasking!) and heard her interview Steve Nickle, President of FamilyLink.com. My takeaways from the interview:

* http://www.genseek.com/ will be released in about two months, perhaps late May.

* FamilyLink.com has a five year agreement with FamilySearch to publish FHL sources online.

* There are 4.5 million sources in the Family History Library Catalog. These will all be online at Genseek.com.

* If "customers" find a source of interest, they could sponsor digitization of that source through Genseek.com.

* "Customers" of Genseek.com may provide "sources" of genealogy information to Genseek.com

* Genseek.com will provide links to digitized data providers, e.g. FamilySearch, Ancestry, WorldVitalRecords, etc.

* Genseek.com will be a hub, a starting place for genealogy research on the Internet.

* Users will be able to comment on the sources and information in the sources.

* GenSeek.com will be FREE to users.

Please go listen to the whole interview (it starts at about "1850" on the little meter on the podcast icon (below the Genealogy Gems Podcast picture on the right sidebar. You have to click the Play button (>) to play the podcast). I hope that I got all of that right! Thank you, Lisa, for the excellent interview on an important genealogy issue.

I think that http://www.genseek.com/ has the potential to be the best thing for the genealogy world since, well, Ancestry.com (I know some would debate that! At least I didn't say Genea-Musings, or EOGN, or Facebook). A web site where all of the genealogy sources are listed (can there ever be "all" of anything listed?) with links to the records (assuming the user has an account with the repository) sounds like a winner.

Will FamilyLink.com launch Genseek.com at the NGS Conference in Raleigh NC in early May?

FamilyLink.com has bitten into a big apple here. I hope that they succeed in bringing Genseek (and their other beta product, WorldHistory.com, too) to a successful launch.

UPDATED 10 p.m.: corrected small typos and added formatting.

Best of the Genea-Blogs - March 8-14, 2009

Several hundred genealogy and family history bloggers write thousands of posts every week about their research, their families, and their interests. I appreciate each one of them and their efforts.

My criteria for "Best of ..." are pretty simple - I pick posts that advance knowledge about genealogy and family history, address current genealogy issues, provide personal family history, are funny or are poignant. I don't list posts destined for the genealogy carnivals, or other meme submissions (but I do include summaries of them), or my own posts.

Here are my picks for great reads from the genealogy blogs for this past week:

* WeRelate - Getting Started and WeRelate: An Introduction to Page Editing by Denise Olson on the Family Matters blog. Denise is my favorite Genealogy 2.0 guru and she provides two wonderful tutorials on WeRelate.org. I think it's great when somebody else writes blog posts so I don't have to, and does it better than I would!

* Hairstyles! by Maureen Taylor on the Photo Detective with Maureen A. Taylor blog. Watch this slide show compiled by Maureen - fascinating, isn't it?

* First, you have to get a milch cow; then . . . by Terry Thornton on the Hill Country of Monroe County, Mississippi blog. Terry writes about so many things that are, um, different for this San Diego city boy. I never realized that milch cows had, well - read the post.

* Conceptual Overview of Genealogical Research by Dan Lawyer on the Taking Genealogy to the Common Person blog. Check out Dan's video and his flow chart of how genealogy research works. This chart may become as famous as Mark Tucker's GPS chart!

* Pop-Top Genealogy by Dick Eastman on Eastman's Online Genealogy Newsletter blog. Dick is concerned that some researchers are only using online sources and expect the Internet to have everything they need. Read the comments too. Enlightening.

* Manchester Maxwell - From the Civil War in Tennessee to Sheep Ranching in Flagstaff, Arizona by Cheryle Hoover Davis on The Graveyard Rabbit of Northern Arizona blog. Cheryle's story of being a real Graveyard Rabbit to help someone who ran across her blog is wonderful. Read Teresa's comment too!

* Capturing the Past by Professor Dru Pair on the Find Your Folks blog. This post has a five video series of how to prepare and conduct an oral history interview. Dru has posted several other videos on this subject this past week.

* Using PERSI by Gena Ortega on the Gena's Genealogy blog. Gena clues us in on how to find and use the PERiodical Source Index - compiled by the Allen County (IN) Public Library, a wonderful resource. You can order the articles too - Gena tells us how.

* The Rest of Paul Harvey’s Story–Part 1 and The Rest of Paul Harvey’s Story–Conclusion by Craig Manson on the Geneablogie blog. Craig tells the background story about Paul Harvey's life that we didn't get on the radio - and for good reason. Fascinating.

* Continuing Education for Genealogists by Carolyn L. Barkley on the GenealogyandFamilyHistory.com blog. This article details the formal continuing education opportunities, including institutes, academic degree programs and home study courses.

* Princess for a Day by Apple on the Apple's Tree blog. Apple has known a family secret for awhile, and asked her mother for more details. She did some research and, well - go read about what she found. Hope springs eternal in the genealogists heart!

* Digital Revolution in Genealogy -- 5 important developments by James Tanner on the Genealogy's Star blog. This is James's first in a series of post about the subject. It's a review of the past and the start of discussing the effect of the digital revolution on genealogy. I look forward to the rest of the series.

* At a Loss... by Cindy on the Everything's Relative - Researching Your Family History blog. Cindy tries to sort out all of her research problems by writing about them. Great idea, and she provided me with a research nugget about Maryland deeds in the process (but no link!).

* Murder in Salem - Susannah Martin Hung as a Witch by Lee R. Drew on the FamHist blog. Lee's 9th great-grandmother was Susannah Martin, and he provides the documents and transcripts from her trial in Salem in 1692. Turns out that Lee and I are cousins - one of my 9th great-grandmothers is Rebecca Towne Nurse, also hung in Salem in 1692.

* Dwight Minns Ware of Springfield & Boston, Massachusetts by Brett Payne on the Photo-Sleuth blog. Brett analyzes an orphan photograph, and finds some family history for the persons in the photograph. Now he's looking for a descendant to give the photograph to. Excellent work!

* A Mini-Bloggers' Summit at CGS by Kathryn Doyle on the California Genealogical Society and Library blog. Four lovely and fun genea-bloggers met at the CGS Library on Saturday, chatted a bit (probably forever), and had a picture taken. And solved a mystery (at least for me!).

I encourage you to go to the blogs listed above and read their articles, and add their blog to your Favorites, Bloglines, reader, feed or email if you like what you read. Please make a comment to them also - all bloggers appreciate feedback on what they write.

Did I miss a great genealogy blog post? Tell me!

Read past Best of the Genea-Blogs posts here.

3/14 SDGS Meeting Summary

I attended the San Diego Genealogical Society (SDGS) meeting on Saturday, 14 March. The program was a British Isles Panel Forum with June Hanson (England/Wales), Mary Russell (Ireland) and Jackie Webster (Scotland). The program summary and speaker CVs are here.

The presentation was in two parts. After introductions, June, Mary and Jackie each spoke for 15 to 20 minutes to summarize research opportunities and challenges in their respective areas. A two-page handout was provided with their main points. It was interesting to see the significant differences between the three areas in terms of available records and research process.

After a 20 minute break for snacks, the meeting resumed with questions from the audience and responses from the panel. There were over ten questions, and several asked about records that might be available beyond church, civil and census records.

There is a special British Isles genealogy section at the San Diego Family History Center in Mission Valley (4195 Camino del Rio South) which is available to San Diego area residents. The section holdings for England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland are available in PDF format at http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~casdgs/bigra.shtml.

Before the meeting, I had a chance to meet two new Facebook friends - Gwynn Socolich and Jack van Wingerden. Jack started the SDGS Facebook Group and Gwynn started the Lost Treasures Group on Facebook. We talked about how to create more interest in the Facebook groups - my suggestion was to try to enlist SDGS members in projects like San Diego Resources, helping Members with their research, and the Lost Treasures activity.

There were over 120 people at the SDGS meeting, with 15 of them guests and visitors. The Beginner's Class before the main meeting had over 20 attendees for the first session. SDGS is doing a lot of things right and well, IMHO. The Saturday meeting day is helpful in drawing a range of age, skills and experience. The classes are excellent, and the programs are too.

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Saturday Night Genealogy Fun - do a Wordle

....
It's Saturday Night, so it's time for more genealogy fun.

Did you see John Newmark's post today about Surname Wordles on his blog, TransylvanianDutch? Let's do that tonight.

Here's your assignment if you want to play:

1) Go to http://www.wordle.net/ and create a Wordle with your surnames in it. As many as you want.

2) Post it on your blog or web page, and/or print it out and hang it on your wall. Show off your prowess!

3) Tell us what you've done - either in Comments to this post or in your own blog. Brag about your creation! If you want me to post it here, send a JPG file to me at rjseaver@cox.net.

4) Can you make something else really creative or pretty? If so, show us.

Here is my Surname Wordle for my last five generations:


How did I make some of them bigger than others? I put Seaver and Carringer in four times, others in three times, others in twice, others only once. Pretty simple, eh? Brute force if you will. You can play around with the font, layout and color selections until you get something you like. I like everything horizontal and colorful.

Here is something I played around with - do you like it?



Who knew? Heh heh. Go forth and create Wordles. Have fun.

Thank you, John, for inspiring me to use this for SNGF.

My Y-DNA Results - Post 4: GeneBase Possible Matches

....
My daughters gifted me a 20-marker Y-DNA test from The DNA Ancestry Project (http://www.dnaancestryproject.com/) for Christmas. I sent it in via mail in mid-January and had not heard anything back from them. I checked into it on Monday and found that my results were available on Genebase.

The first post described Getting Started on the web site. The second post described Reading the Markers - seeing my 20 Y-DNA markers for the first time. In Post 3: GeneBase Family Tree I uploaded my family tree to Genebase and showed the results.

In this post, I will show the possible matches in the Genebase Y-DNA database.

Here is the welcome screen in Genebase. I had to search hard for the link to the possible matches results.


The link to the possible matches is under the "DNA Ancestry" tab and then, for the Y-DNA results, under the "Paternal Line" link, and then click on the "DNA Reunion" link. The resulting screen looks like this:

On this screen, it says:

Compare your Y-DNA STR markers to other participants in the database. This search compares every marker that you and other participants have tested.
Show participants who have tested at least [6] of the markers that I have tested.

Allow a maximum genetic distance of [4]

I decided to set the marker number to [10] and the maximum genetic distance to [2]. I clicked on the great big "Find Matches" button (no mystery here!):

Finally. I have 114 Genetic Matches that satisfy my match criteria of at least 10 markers and a genetic distance (GD) of 2. There are 7 that match 10 out of 10 (GD+0) - but none of them are anything close to a Seaver surname. There is one match that is 19 out of 20 (GD+1), three that are 12 out of 13 (GD=1), one that is 11 out of 12 (GD=1), and one that is 19 out of 20 (GD=2).

I can compare my genetic markers with those of another tester by clicking on the "Compare Y-DNA" icon in the right-hand column - I chose the 19 out of 20 (GD=1) person - and saw:



The only marker that was on my test that we don't match on is DYS390. He tested 44 markers, more than I did. I can click on the "Family Tree" icon in the right-hand column to see his the family tree that he uploaded to see if there are any surnames or place names similar to those on my family tree. There are no common surnames, and place names are not given.

I could click on the "Contact this user" icon in the right-hand column to send a message to this person.

There is also an icon for Time of Most Recent Common Ancestor (TMRCA), so I clicked that. It said:

Base upon a mutation rate of 0.002 for Y-DNA STR markers, you and XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX most likely shared a common paternal ancestor 13 generations ago.

Cumulative probability ranges are as follows:

The probability that you and XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX shared a common ancestor within the last 22 generations is 50%.

The probability that you and XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX shared a common ancestor within the last 39 generations is 80%.

The probability that you and XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX shared a common ancestor within the last 62 generations is 95%.


That certainly puts it all in perspective, doesn't it? The first line is very misleading! I don't associate the words "most likely" with anything less than 80% certainty. Certainly not 13 generations! The correct word in the first sentence should be "might have" rather than "most likely."

The site provides a table for likelihood and cumulative probability of TMRCA out to 150 generations. The cumulative probability of TMRCA for 13 generations is 26%.

This part of the web site and database is very well thought out. It takes some poking around to find the icons in the right-hand column - a guide at the top of the table would be very helpful.

I will continue looking for possible Y-DNA matches in other database in the next post.

Friday, March 13, 2009

What is the Value of Genealogy 2.0 Technology?

Chris Staats on the Staats Place blog has asked this question:

"...what value [do] you feel (or IF you feel) blogs, wikis, social networking (Facebook, Twitter, etc), and any other tool I am omitting, actually add?"

My general response is this: Each of the tools of Genealogy 2.0 has the potential to broadcast genealogically relevant material, draw more genealogists and relatives into online communities and to foster online collaboration between researchers and/or relatives.

1) Blogs -- Genealogy blogs have reached some maturity in the form of creative writing, genealogy news broadcasts, issue commentary and sharing of genealogy research and family stories. I have over 430 genealogy blogs in my Bloglines file, and read new posts from them every day. There is a wealth of informative and entertaining material published on genealogy blogs every day. Some of the writers have been tabbed to write articles and columns for local, regional and national genealogy periodicals. In the future, more will be selected - blogs can be an incubator of creative and reportorial talent.

While the presence of hundreds of active genealogy blogs sounds impressive, the number is actually fairly small. Blogs do have some impact on the genealogy industry by acting as the town crier (news and commentary), the tester and demonstrator (of web sites, databases, etc.), and family history writer (stories, photographs, etc.). In the long term, the family history material is what will last - will be gathered into eBooks that are distributed to family members to inform and delight descendants of common and unique ancestors.

Genealogy bloggers have tried to foster collaboration and community within themselves and the larger genealogy world - in the form of Carnivals of Genealogy (and there are several publishing on a regular basis), through groups like the Geneabloggers and The Graveyard Rabbit, and through online columns such as on Shades of the Departed and The Genealogy and Technology Examiner.

2) Wikis -- The most widely known wiki is http://www.wikipedia.com/, which serves as an online encyclopedia produced by anybody who wants to participate. A similar wiki is the Encyclopedia of Genealogy started by Dick Eastman. One of the largest free genealogy person-wiki is at We Relate, which has over 2 million person pages submitted by users. You can see an overview of We Relate in this slide show. The idea of a wiki is to foster collaboration between relatives and friends using a common online platform.

I think that person-wikis have tremendous potential, but not many genealogists are using them yet. Some genealogy database providers, like http://www.footnote.com/, http://www.ancestry.com/ and http://www.familysearch.org/ are providing person-wiki platforms also. My guess is that less than 2,000 persons have added their GEDCOM files to http://www.werelate.org/ despite significant publicity. http://www.footnote.com/ added over 80 million Footnote Pages using the Social Security Death Index, but very few genealogists are aware of the site, the capability and the potential. The main drawback, in my opinion, is the limitations of GEDCOMs - they cannot upload the images of photographs and documents that researchers have attached to their genealogy software databases. Images can be uploaded one at a time to the WeRelate and Footnote wikis, but that can take a long time for those with thousands in their family tree databases. http://www.ancestry.com/ probably has the best chance to create a large person-wiki site, since it has millions of family trees already online, but only some of the users have the images attached to their online database. However, the collaboration aspect on Ancestry is not available.

3. Facebook -- The main purpose of this site (and similar sites) in the general population is to communicate and network with Friends and colleagues using email, notes and comments, share photographs and videos, play games or send gifts, join interest groups, write short comments about their activities, etc.

In the genealogy world, Facebook has been used in the classical way, but oriented toward genealogy subjects. Almost all of my Facebook Friends are in the genealogy world, and over time I get to know something about their life, their genealogy interests and skills. I would feel comfortable asking them to share a meal and conversation if they came to San Diego, if I was in their area, or if we were at a conference in another place. If I need some help in a distant place, I might ask a Facebook Friend in that place for help or information.

There are several collaborative genealogy groups on Facebook. For instance, the Unclaimed Persons group has over 500 members and has solved over 50 cold cases in less than a year on a voluntary and collaborative basis - essentially finding pertinent information, sharing it, suggesting research avenues, and coming to a conclusion about the case solution. It's fun, rewarding and challenging. The key to making any Facebook Group proliferate is to engage in projects or activities that are fun and challenging.

There are some genealogy societies on Facebook that have a group - Chris mentioned the Ohio Genealogical Society with (now) 50 group members. My local San Diego Genealogical Society has 19 group members. Those are small fractions of total society memberships. The challenge for societies is to achieve some useful objective which will excite their members to join the Facebook group. A Facebook Group can be used, as a minimum, for making society program or educational announcements.

Facebook has Applications like We're Related and Geni (and there are others) for Facebook users to add family tree information. We're Related is touted by FamilyLink.com as the #1 genealogy application, but a researcher cannot upload a GEDCOM at this time. A researcher can upload a small GEDCOM to Geni and show their family tree. Facebook users of these applications can invite relatives and friends to add to the family tree data and images. This capability has great potential for connecting to cousins and more distant relatives, but is probably not a wonderful genealogy collaboration vehicle.

4) Twitter is a site for instant communications - from an online computer, a PDA or a cell phone (by Instant Message). The user is limited to 140 characters per tweet. Some people use it for social or political activities, some to highlight their new blog posts (guilty!) or genealogy activities, and some to live-tweet a seminar or conference meeting. A Twitter user can send private messages to other users. A Facebook user can sync their tweets so that they appear as Facebook comments.

5) Collaborative Family Trees -- Examples of this category are http://www.geni.com/, http://www.myheritage.com/, http://www.dynastree.com/, http://www.geneanet.org/, http://www.myfamily.com/, and many others. On these sites, a researcher can upload their GEDCOM file and their digital images, and then invite other family members to do the same. In some cases, these are subscription sites. They work as far as they go. Each site needs a critical mass of researchers to contribute their family tree data and then collaborate on adding to the information. I'm not sure that this happens on a regular basis other than immediately after the first rush of adding data and images. Again, they are good for connecting to cousins and other relatives, but probably not for genealogy collaboration with other researchers.

Chris asked what is the "value" of these sites. My opinion:

* Blogs have value for genealogy news, commentary, demonstrating and family history publishing.

* Wikis have a high potential for value in fostering genealogical collaboration but need more participants to achieve a "critical mass" of users.

* Facebook and Twitter are instant communication sites that can foster friendships and group activities.

* Family tree sites can bring relatives together to share family information and images, but probably not much research collaboration.


* Each of these sites can be tremendous time-wasters. Playing Scrabble on Facebook or tweeting every mundane act in your day may not be productive, depending on your own priorities. It helps to have a focus on the goals for the day, whether it is to write three blog posts, make new Facebook Friends, do more research at a repository, add more information to your database, write or edit a book chapter, etc. Or all of the above! I try to limit blog reading to 30 minutes a day, to limit Twitter and Facebook time to 30 minutes a day, to limit blog post writing to no more than tow hours a day, and to do something that advances the genealogy research ball toward the family history book goal line every day.

* If the genealogy industry is going to draw young people into the fold, then Genealogy 2.0 is probably one of the vehicles. Most people under age 40 are comfortable with technology and use it extensively. Using these tools is one way to add youth, enthusiasm and technology experience to the industry and our genealogical societies.

What do you think? How would you answer Chris's questions? Please comment on this blog or on Staats Place.

Some answers to newFamilySearch Questions

One of the really neat things about genealogy blogging is that it provokes almost instant responses from knowledgeable people. Such is the case with my post yesterday LDS NewFamilySearch Questions. Michael Booth and Miles Meyer were kind to respond with comments to my post. Lee Drew emailed me with some information and links. Miles emailed me with more information. Jimmy Zimmerman sent me a tweet saying FamilySearch employees would love to answer my questions but Genea-Musings is blocked on their computers (I wonder why?).

After writing my post yesterday, I spent all of the morning and some of the afternoon watching the videos on the Mastering Family History site. These are very informative and helpful in understanding what is available at newFamilySearch. Michael Booth said, in his comment, that the videos are pretty accurate.

I also searched for more presentations and articles about newFamilySearch and quickly found Miles Meyer's web site at http://milesmeyer.googlepages.com/. Miles has an excellent article on his site - An Introduction to New FamilySearch. This has screen views of the Individual person's information - it looks like it includes Individual vital record Details, Individual Map, Individual Timeline, Parents and Siblings, Spouses and Children, LDS Ordinances, Possible Duplicates, Individual Notes, and Combined records. Miles told me in email that "... nFS is being replaced by FamilyTree Browser which is more graphically oriented. The Life Browser components from FamilySearch Labs are not yet included in FamilyTree but some of the Pedigree Viewer components are."

Lee Drew's email provided a link to the GarysTurn Picasa Web albums with several nFS presentations online. Lee also indicated that the Life Browser and Pedigree Viewer applications, that I mentioned yesterday, are not currently included in new FamilySearch. Lee noted that something like LifeBrowser would require substantial storage, processing and bandwidth to implement.

I followed one of the Ancestry Insider's tweet links today and found Alan Mann's articles archive, which includes Family Search: What's New and What's Coming from October 2008. Alan's annotated pipeline picture is excellent - there is so much that goes into bringing records from paper to your computer screen. The article notes that "... Life Browser, may be years away from being in production."

In my earlier post, I expressed my admiration for the LifeBrowser concept, and that I really liked the integration of individual details, record images, photographs, timeline, map, biography, etc. into a wiki-type page. Unfortunately, it appears that LifeBrowser is not currently implemented in newFamilySearch.

Michael made the comment that "When you think of sheer amount of information that is contained in the database and the number of people that will want to access it, you can see why they're worried about 'scalability'- the ability for the system to handle so many users accessing so much data.The good news is that the system isn't just some pipe-dream. It exists and it works (with some bugs still). It's just a question of getting the software and hardware to catch up to the pent-up demand for it."

Lee put it into perspective with his comment that "... After all, FamilySearch resources are free and are supported out of church coffers. It costs a lot to support an application like Life Browser especially when users like you and I populate it with wild enthusiasm. I'm sure the church will never charge for any of their FamilySearch resources other than fees similar to those associated with renting a film, etc. We can see how they are teaming with governments, churches, commercial entities and the public to mitigate the costs of bring so many records to us .... the users ..... and don't we love it! "

I hope that this summary of what I've found out about new FamilySearch is interesting and useful to you. I know that I have just scratched the surface in this summary, and I am a real FamilySearch outsider, but I know that I have a better understanding of the effort and the product as it currently stands. My thanks to Michael, Miles, Lee, Gary and Alan for sharing their thoughts with me and/or for putting educational material on the Internet for all of us.

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Records Preservation and Access Committee (RPAC) Recommendations

The report on "Open Access to Public Records: A Genealogical Perspective; A White Paper by the Records Preservation and Access Committee of The Federation of Genealogical Societies and The National Genealogical Society" was posted on the Federation of Genealogical Societies (FGS) web site - see it at http://www.fgs.org/rpac/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/rpac-white-paper-6-mar.pdf.


This is a very important document for genealogists. I urge each of you to read it and understand it.

There are two really useful sections in this report for genealogy research:

1. The recommendations of RPAC for birth, death and adoption record access are:

"The Records Preservation and Access Committee (RPAC) recommends that birth records be considered open records not less than one-hundred (100) years from the date of birth.

"The RPAC recommends that death records be considered open records not less than twenty-five (25) years from the date of death.

"The RPAC recommends that adoption records be considered open records to adoptees, preferably when they reach their majority, age 18 in most states, but no later than age 30, while effective use may be made of health information. We also recommend that adoption records become open records to the public through the state archives or another means after one-hundred (100) years from the date of the adoption. "

2. The Appendix of this report provides a state-by-state summary of the records collected, the year started, applicable codes, and the availability of those records. For instance, for California:

"Birth - 1905 - Health and Safety Code § 102430

Marriage - 1905 - Family Code § 5112; Health and Safety Code § 10361 (both repealed in 1995) - FHLC Marriage Indexes 1960 – 1981; California provides for confidential marriages which are not open to the public.

Divorce

Death - 1905 - Microfiche Index 1905-1995 FHLC Death Indexes 1940 – 1995

Adoption - Closed - Health and Safety Code § 102705

The RPAC has taken a responsible position in this white paper to protect privacy while making reasonable recommendations to open records to the public and to genealogy researchers. I really appreciate this effort - I know it took a long time to work it out. I hope that the states will take these recommendations to heart.

SDGS Beginning Genealogy Classes

The San Diego Genealogical Society (SDGS) offers FREE classes in Beginning Genealogy twice each year to help people learn more about their family. The next round starts this Saturday, 14 March, from 10 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. at St. Andrew's Lutheran Church, 8350 Lake Murray Blvd. (corner of Jackson Drive), San Diego CA 92119.

The four class dates and topics are:

March 14 - Genealogy Basics
April 11 - Census Records
May 9 - Vital Records
June 13 - Computer Resources

The course will be repeated on 11 July, 8 August, 12 September and 10 October.

Registration is recommended, but not required. For more information, or to register, call 1-619-588-0065. Walk-ins are welcome.

These classes have been a good drawing card for SDGS to gain new members. They are held before the regular SDGS program meeting.

If you are interested in becoming a genealogist in San Diego, these classes are an excellent way to start your lifelong search for ancestors. You can't beat the price, and the lessons are excellent, not to mention the fellowship in the class and the subsequent SDGS meeting. You will find that this is almost the most fun there is in your intellectual life!