I am posting family photographs from my collection on Wednesdays, but they aren't "Wordless" - I am incapable of having a wordless post!
Here is a photograph from the Seaver/Carringer family photograph collection from my 40 years of photo albums, boxes and piles of family photographs:
This photo was taken in the summer of 1982 in Clinton, Massachusetts at the home of Bowers and Ruth (Seaver) Fischer. Ruth (1907-2000) was my father's sister. She married Bowers Arnold Fischer (1906-1988) in 1930. They had two daughters, my first cousins. Bowers grandparents were from Germany, France, and New Hampshire. I haven't traced his line past them.
I met Ruth and Bowers for the first time in 1967 when I went to Boston on business and then spent some time with my Seaver family in Leominster, Mass. before going on to Montreal for a radio club convention. Bowers worked at a bank, and I needed Canadian money, and he greased those skids for me. They were very warm and friendly people.
The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/10/bowers-and-ruth-seaver-fischer-post-329.html
copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver
Welcome to my genealogy blog. Genea-Musings features genealogy research tips and techniques, genealogy news items and commentary, genealogy humor, San Diego genealogy society news, family history research and some family history stories from the keyboard of Randy Seaver (of Chula Vista CA), who thinks that Genealogy Research Is really FUN! Copyright (c) Randall J. Seaver, 2006-2024.
Wednesday, October 15, 2014
Tuesday, October 14, 2014
Requesting a Microfilm Image From the FHL
I read Diane Gould Hall's post on Photo Duplication Requests on FamilySearch back in July on her excellent Michigan Family Trials blog, and thought to myself "Randy, you really need to do that!"
Last week, I identified the will of John Seaver on a microfilm in the Family History Library Catalog as a document that might help me solve a research challenge (see Attacking a Seaver Relationship Problem - Parents of Joseph T. Seaver (1805-????)). I'm going to request a digital photograph of that document from the Family History Library.
The FamilySearch Wiki page describing this service is https://familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Photoduplication_Services. This should be read from top to bottom. The site says:
"Photoduplication is a service provided to FamilySearch patrons who would like individual images from microfilm or fiche, copies of records, or pages in books that can be found in the Family History Library."
"WE WILL LIMIT YOUR REQUEST TO FIVE (5) REQUESTS PER MONTH. EACH REQUEST CAN CONTAIN ONLY ONE (1) IMAGE. Requests are processed in the order they are received. Allow 4 to 6 weeks for delivery."
And: "There is NO CHARGE for photoduplication services e-mailed to you. We do not mail photocopies."
The FamilySearch website has the Photo Duplication Services form at https://familysearch.org/ask/photoduplication
Here is the form I filled out (two screens):
I know that the 1853 will of John Seaver in Bristol County, Massachusetts is in Volume 99 of the microfilms for Probate records 1687-1916; index, 1687-1926 [Bristol county, Massachusetts] on page 189, but I don't know if it is only on page 189 or if goes on to page 190 and perhaps further. I guess, in the worst case, if it continues on but I get only page 189, I can request the next page with another request. I asked for "page 189 + if more than one page."
I'm actively looking for more single pages that I "want" to request in digital image format. Unfortunately, most of them are multiple pages.
The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/10/requesting-microfilm-image-from-fhl.html
Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver
Last week, I identified the will of John Seaver on a microfilm in the Family History Library Catalog as a document that might help me solve a research challenge (see Attacking a Seaver Relationship Problem - Parents of Joseph T. Seaver (1805-????)). I'm going to request a digital photograph of that document from the Family History Library.
The FamilySearch Wiki page describing this service is https://familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Photoduplication_Services. This should be read from top to bottom. The site says:
"Photoduplication is a service provided to FamilySearch patrons who would like individual images from microfilm or fiche, copies of records, or pages in books that can be found in the Family History Library."
"WE WILL LIMIT YOUR REQUEST TO FIVE (5) REQUESTS PER MONTH. EACH REQUEST CAN CONTAIN ONLY ONE (1) IMAGE. Requests are processed in the order they are received. Allow 4 to 6 weeks for delivery."
And: "There is NO CHARGE for photoduplication services e-mailed to you. We do not mail photocopies."
The FamilySearch website has the Photo Duplication Services form at https://familysearch.org/ask/photoduplication
Here is the form I filled out (two screens):
I know that the 1853 will of John Seaver in Bristol County, Massachusetts is in Volume 99 of the microfilms for Probate records 1687-1916; index, 1687-1926 [Bristol county, Massachusetts] on page 189, but I don't know if it is only on page 189 or if goes on to page 190 and perhaps further. I guess, in the worst case, if it continues on but I get only page 189, I can request the next page with another request. I asked for "page 189 + if more than one page."
I'm actively looking for more single pages that I "want" to request in digital image format. Unfortunately, most of them are multiple pages.
The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/10/requesting-microfilm-image-from-fhl.html
Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver
One Family Tree File or Many Tree Files?
On the Technology for Genealogy group on Facebook, Betty Marek asked this question yesterday:
"What is recommended on FTM--one huge single tree, including all branches of your family as well as spouse's family; or several trees for each branch of the family surname as well as separate trees in a spouse's family?"
We also talked about this in the Monday, 13 October Hangout On Air for Mondays With Myrt (on YouTube. This discussion starts at 1:00:00 on the video.
1) My response was "One big tree." My reasons:
* I have several cousin relationships between my mother and my father which were unknown when I started growing my family tree. If I had one tree for my mother, and one for my father, I would have to input information for their common ancestral families twice.
* The same thing happens for my daughters and their husbands - one of them is her husband's distant cousin in several New England lines. It also happens for my cousins spouses.
* I started several One Name Studies with separate trees for each - Seaver, Carringer, Auble, Vaux, Buck, Dill, Richman, etc. I had to enter information for my own ancestral families twice in several different trees. I finally combined them into my one big tree about ten years ago and haven't regretted it.
The chart above shows that my parents are seventh cousins.
2) My family tree database has one "Big Tree" (my ancestral families, with my daughters' spouses' ancestry, and my one-name study families that connect to me. My database also has many "bushes" of various sizes because some of my One Name Study subjects that are not connected to the "Big Tree."
I do have some family tree files sent to me by other researchers, but I have extracted the information that I want, and that sources support, and added it to my "Big tree" one person at a time.
3) I also have several separate "client" trees that I have created over the years. I've wondered if I should add those to my "Big Tree" as just another "Bush" in order to save the research, but I haven't done that yet. The alternative is to add these client bushes as separate Ancestry Member Trees on Ancestry, and to add the data to the FamilySearch Family Tree from the client trees.
4) What are your reasons for having one "Big Tree" or several smaller "Grandpa Trees?"
The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/10/one-family-tree-file-or-many-tree-files.html
Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver
"What is recommended on FTM--one huge single tree, including all branches of your family as well as spouse's family; or several trees for each branch of the family surname as well as separate trees in a spouse's family?"
We also talked about this in the Monday, 13 October Hangout On Air for Mondays With Myrt (on YouTube. This discussion starts at 1:00:00 on the video.
1) My response was "One big tree." My reasons:
* I have several cousin relationships between my mother and my father which were unknown when I started growing my family tree. If I had one tree for my mother, and one for my father, I would have to input information for their common ancestral families twice.
* The same thing happens for my daughters and their husbands - one of them is her husband's distant cousin in several New England lines. It also happens for my cousins spouses.
* I started several One Name Studies with separate trees for each - Seaver, Carringer, Auble, Vaux, Buck, Dill, Richman, etc. I had to enter information for my own ancestral families twice in several different trees. I finally combined them into my one big tree about ten years ago and haven't regretted it.
2) My family tree database has one "Big Tree" (my ancestral families, with my daughters' spouses' ancestry, and my one-name study families that connect to me. My database also has many "bushes" of various sizes because some of my One Name Study subjects that are not connected to the "Big Tree."
I do have some family tree files sent to me by other researchers, but I have extracted the information that I want, and that sources support, and added it to my "Big tree" one person at a time.
3) I also have several separate "client" trees that I have created over the years. I've wondered if I should add those to my "Big Tree" as just another "Bush" in order to save the research, but I haven't done that yet. The alternative is to add these client bushes as separate Ancestry Member Trees on Ancestry, and to add the data to the FamilySearch Family Tree from the client trees.
4) What are your reasons for having one "Big Tree" or several smaller "Grandpa Trees?"
The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/10/one-family-tree-file-or-many-tree-files.html
Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver
Technology Tuesday - FamilySearch Family Tree Mobile App
FamilySearch recently released its mobile app called Family Tree for iOS 7+ and Android 2.3+devices - see the FamilySearch blog post at https://familysearch.org/blog/en/familysearch-introduces-moble-apps/. There is a Family Tree mobile app landing page at https://familysearch.org/mobile/tree.
The mobile app is FREE from the App Store on the iOS products, and from Google Play for Android products. A user must have a FREE FamilySearch account and have connected themselves to the FamilySearch Family Tree in order to use the mobile app to its fullest potential.
A user can add Memories (Photos, Stories, Audio) and Sources using the mobile app and the information will synchronize with the online FamilySearch Family Tree. Adding or updating ancestor details like names, dates, places and relationships is not yet available.
1) The opening screen of the Family Tree mobile app on my iPhone looks like this:
The Pedigree view above shows myself and three more generations. I can pinch or expand the view to make the information larger or smaller.
Tapping on the up arrow above a person in the top line expands the pedigree chart for two more generations for that person, as shown below:
2) If I tap on a person on the Pedigree View above, I can see their "Details":
Scrolling down, I can see the "Other Information" on the list:
3) If I tap on the "spouses" menu item, I can see the spouses and children of the person:
If I tap on any of the blue names, I will go to the profile of that person.
4) Tapping on the "Parents" link, I can see their names, their marriage date, and their children:
5) Tapping on the "Sources" link shows me the sources attached for this person in the Family Tree:
Tapping on a specific source item takes you to a web page with a 404 Error at this time if the user has added the source manually rather than linking to a FamilySearch record summary.
6) There are more links to the right of the "Sources" link, so I scrolled to the left to see them.
Here is the "Photos" link screen:
I have attached only these two photos to my great-grandfather. If I tap one of the photos, I can see a larger image on the screen and can add or edit a caption to it. If I tap on the plus sign in the lower right-hand corner, I can add a photograph and attach it to this Person.
7) Tapping on the "Stories" link, I can see the stories attached to the person:
If I tap on one of the Stories, I can read the whole story, but I cannot edit it.
8) Tapping on the "Charts" link, I can see a list of the different charts that can be saved as a PDF file:
Here is what it looks like using the Adobe Reader app on my mobile device:
I could also save the PDF in Evernote, Dropbox, or in eBooks.
9) All in all, this mobile app is very useful. I essentially have the FamilySearch Family Tree in my pocket for ready reference. I can navigate up and down the tree using the Pedigree View or by tapping on names, and I can see the information for persons in the Family Tree.
10) The mobile app, at this time, does not permit adding persons or editing information about persons. The blog post indicated that those features were coming soon. I don't see a way to easily Search for a person in the Family Tree. There is a Search capability for an FSID number in the History screen (the icon on the right-hand side of the "Person" title on the screens above).
The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/10/technology-tuesday-familysearch-family.html
Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver
The mobile app is FREE from the App Store on the iOS products, and from Google Play for Android products. A user must have a FREE FamilySearch account and have connected themselves to the FamilySearch Family Tree in order to use the mobile app to its fullest potential.
A user can add Memories (Photos, Stories, Audio) and Sources using the mobile app and the information will synchronize with the online FamilySearch Family Tree. Adding or updating ancestor details like names, dates, places and relationships is not yet available.
1) The opening screen of the Family Tree mobile app on my iPhone looks like this:
The Pedigree view above shows myself and three more generations. I can pinch or expand the view to make the information larger or smaller.
Tapping on the up arrow above a person in the top line expands the pedigree chart for two more generations for that person, as shown below:
2) If I tap on a person on the Pedigree View above, I can see their "Details":
Scrolling down, I can see the "Other Information" on the list:
3) If I tap on the "spouses" menu item, I can see the spouses and children of the person:
If I tap on any of the blue names, I will go to the profile of that person.
4) Tapping on the "Parents" link, I can see their names, their marriage date, and their children:
5) Tapping on the "Sources" link shows me the sources attached for this person in the Family Tree:
Tapping on a specific source item takes you to a web page with a 404 Error at this time if the user has added the source manually rather than linking to a FamilySearch record summary.
6) There are more links to the right of the "Sources" link, so I scrolled to the left to see them.
Here is the "Photos" link screen:
I have attached only these two photos to my great-grandfather. If I tap one of the photos, I can see a larger image on the screen and can add or edit a caption to it. If I tap on the plus sign in the lower right-hand corner, I can add a photograph and attach it to this Person.
7) Tapping on the "Stories" link, I can see the stories attached to the person:
If I tap on one of the Stories, I can read the whole story, but I cannot edit it.
8) Tapping on the "Charts" link, I can see a list of the different charts that can be saved as a PDF file:
Here is what it looks like using the Adobe Reader app on my mobile device:
I could also save the PDF in Evernote, Dropbox, or in eBooks.
9) All in all, this mobile app is very useful. I essentially have the FamilySearch Family Tree in my pocket for ready reference. I can navigate up and down the tree using the Pedigree View or by tapping on names, and I can see the information for persons in the Family Tree.
10) The mobile app, at this time, does not permit adding persons or editing information about persons. The blog post indicated that those features were coming soon. I don't see a way to easily Search for a person in the Family Tree. There is a Search capability for an FSID number in the History screen (the icon on the right-hand side of the "Person" title on the screens above).
The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/10/technology-tuesday-familysearch-family.html
Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver
Monday, October 13, 2014
New or Updated Collections at Family Search - October 5 to 11, 2014
It is always a struggle to keep up with the new and updated record collections at FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/search/collection/list). As of 5 October, there were 1,838 record collections on FamilySearch (up 1 from last week, which one was it?).
Here are the new and updated collections for the week of 5 to 11 October 2014:
* Maryland, Register of Wills Records, 1629-1999, Browse Images, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* Ohio, Cuyahoga County Probate Files, 1813-1932, Browse Images, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* Belgium, East Flanders, Civil Registration, 1541-1910, 212,210 indexed records, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* Belgium, West Flanders, Civil Registration, 1582-1910, 184,816 indexed records, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* Belgium, Liège, Civil Registration, 1621-1910, 79,005 indexed records, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* Belgium, Namur, Civil Registration, 1800-1912, Browse Images, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* Belgium, Hainaut, Civil Registration, 1600-1913, 197,522 indexed records, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* England and Wales, Marriage Registration Index, 1837-2005, 95,810,909 indexed records, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* Pennsylvania Obituaries, 1977-2010, 99,894 indexed records, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* Ohio, County Death Records, 1840-2001, 2,155,570 indexed records, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* New York, Queens County Probate Records, 1785-1950, Browse Images, added or updated 08 Oct 2014
* India, Hindu Pilgrimage Records, 1194-2014, Browse Images, added or updated 08 Oct 2014
* New Jersey, State Census, 1915, 2,785,409 indexed records, added or updated 08 Oct 2014
* United States General Index to Pension Files, 1861-1934, 2,210,004 indexed records, added or updated 07 Oct 2014
* Indonesia, Jawa Tengah, Mungkid District Court Records, 1985-2013, Browse Images, added or updated 06 Oct 2014
* Slovakia, Church and Synagogue Books, 1592-1910 , 13,829,595 indexed records, added or updated 06 Oct 2014
Unfortunately, it is difficult to tell which collections are brand new and which ones are updated. The asterisk is for "new or updated." I am particularly interested in new collections, for the obvious reasons.
Each one of the collections listed above has a Research Wiki page (use the "Learn more" link). It would be very useful if the Wiki page for each collection listed the dates for when the collection was added as a new collection and the major updates also.
The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/10/new-or-updated-collections-at-family_13.html
Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver
Here are the new and updated collections for the week of 5 to 11 October 2014:
* Maryland, Register of Wills Records, 1629-1999, Browse Images, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* Ohio, Cuyahoga County Probate Files, 1813-1932, Browse Images, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* Belgium, East Flanders, Civil Registration, 1541-1910, 212,210 indexed records, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* Belgium, West Flanders, Civil Registration, 1582-1910, 184,816 indexed records, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* Belgium, Liège, Civil Registration, 1621-1910, 79,005 indexed records, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* Belgium, Namur, Civil Registration, 1800-1912, Browse Images, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* Belgium, Hainaut, Civil Registration, 1600-1913, 197,522 indexed records, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* England and Wales, Marriage Registration Index, 1837-2005, 95,810,909 indexed records, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* Pennsylvania Obituaries, 1977-2010, 99,894 indexed records, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* Ohio, County Death Records, 1840-2001, 2,155,570 indexed records, added or updated 09 Oct 2014
* New York, Queens County Probate Records, 1785-1950, Browse Images, added or updated 08 Oct 2014
* India, Hindu Pilgrimage Records, 1194-2014, Browse Images, added or updated 08 Oct 2014
* New Jersey, State Census, 1915, 2,785,409 indexed records, added or updated 08 Oct 2014
* United States General Index to Pension Files, 1861-1934, 2,210,004 indexed records, added or updated 07 Oct 2014
* Indonesia, Jawa Tengah, Mungkid District Court Records, 1985-2013, Browse Images, added or updated 06 Oct 2014
* Slovakia, Church and Synagogue Books, 1592-1910 , 13,829,595 indexed records, added or updated 06 Oct 2014
Unfortunately, it is difficult to tell which collections are brand new and which ones are updated. The asterisk is for "new or updated." I am particularly interested in new collections, for the obvious reasons.
Each one of the collections listed above has a Research Wiki page (use the "Learn more" link). It would be very useful if the Wiki page for each collection listed the dates for when the collection was added as a new collection and the major updates also.
The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/10/new-or-updated-collections-at-family_13.html
Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver
My Top Genea-Discoveries: Isaac Buck's (1757-1846) Birth Father
Betty on the Betty's Boneyard Genealogy Blog wrote My Top Ten Genealogical Discoveries--So Far! on 31 August 2014, and I've been meaning to write about my own genea-discoveries ever since.
I'm not going to rank them all, and I'm going to do them one at a time so I can describe them in some detail - perhaps my experience will help others.
Genea-Discovery: Isaac Buck's (1757-1846) Birth Father
1) One of my most challenging genealogy mysteries has been to identify the father of Isaac Buck, born in 1757 in Southborough MA.
According to the Southborough (Mass.) Town Record book:
"Born to Mary Richards, a son named Isaac Buck reputed by her to be a son of Isaac Buck on Sepr 27, 1757."
This record is on the same page, and just below, the list of children born to Joseph and Mary Richards, including their daughter Mary in 1733.
While browsing through The American Genealogist for 1992, I found an article called "Southborough Mass. Notifications", which included the following:
"I have taken into my house ... a famaley Last from Framingham the
name of Isaac Buck and his wife Ruth and ther Children Susanna and
Joseph, March ye 25:1756. Joseph Richards."
This Joseph Richards is the son of Joseph (died 1748) and Mary (died 1755) Richards who also were the parents of Mary Richards (born 24 September 1733 in Lynn, Mass.). It may be that the young Mary Richards lived with her brother Joseph Richards (and his wife Lydia) when Isaac and Ruth (Graves) Buck moved into the home of Joseph Richards in 1756. Isaac and Ruth went to Southborough to close out her father's estate.
It would appear that Isaac Buck, husband of Ruth, or some other, perhaps younger, Isaac Buck had the opportunity to impregnate Mary Richards. It is most likely to have been a younger Isaac Buck.
In 1765, "spinster Mary Richards" and her siblings conveyed their share of the homestead land to their brother, William Richards. This is the last found record of Mary Richards, and indicates she was known as Mary Richards and not Mary Buck at that time.
A Mary Richards married John Phillips in 1774, according to records in both Southborough and Lancaster, Mass. They had no children recorded.
Isaac Buck, son of Mary Richards, married Martha (Patty) Phillips, daughter of John and Hannah (Brown) Phillips, on 18 May 1780 in Lancaster, Mass.
It is apparent to me that Mary Richards, mother of Isaac Buck, married John Phillips, father of Martha (Patty) Phillips. Isaac and Martha were probably living in the same house in Lancaster MA as teenagers!
But - the question remained - who is the Isaac Buck that fathered Isaac Buck in 1757 by Mary Richards? Was it the older Isaac Buck, husband of Ruth Graves? Or was it another Isaac Buck who was perhaps an unrecorded son of the older Isaac and Ruth (Graves) Buck?
"(V) Isaac Buck, son of Ephraim Buck (IV) was born about 1705 in Woburn Mass or vicinity. He was living at Woburn when he married at Reading Mass, Dec 3 1729, Ruth Graves. Isaac Buck moved to Southboro and with his wife Ruth sold their rights in the estate of her father, Joseph Graves, late of Southboro, Mass, October 19 1757. Among their children were: Isaac, born about 1730; Esther, married at Southboro, May 4 1762, Elisha Bruce Jr.; probably others.
"(VI) Isaac Buck, son of Isaac Buck (V), was born about 1730. He removed to Southboro with his father, and married Mary Richards about 1755. His children: Isaac, born in Southboro, Sept 27 1757, see forward; Susanna, married November 14 1793 Elisha Bemis. The family removed to Bolton, Mass."
It goes on to tell about Isaac Buck's (born 1757) family (he settled finally in Sterling, which was created in 1791 from Lancaster), had a big family with Patty Phillips, and provides several more generations in one line.
3) The question arises: Did the Isaac Buck, born 1730, really exist? There are no vital records for birth, marriage or death, and no land or probate records in Worcester or Middlesex Counties for him. Just because a memoir book says he existed doesn't make it true. The memoir book entry may have been from an earlier family history book or unpublished research efforts.
There are no other Buck records in Southborough town records other than the ones noted above.
The index and abstracts of all Buck probate records in Worcester and Middlesex Counties were reviewed, and do not reveal records for the elder, middle or younger Isaac Buck. Land index records for Worcester County were reviewed, and do not reveal any land bought or sold by any Isaac Buck (except the husband of Ruth) before 1800. There are many listings for other Buck families, including Isaac Buck's (1757-1846) descendants around Sterling MA.
Isaac and Ruth Buck granted land in Southborough to Joseph Graves in 1765. This record was dated 19 October 1757 and registered by the court 29 October 1765. Isaac and Ruth Buck "of Southborough" deeded the property received from their "honoured father Thomas Graves" to Joseph Graves, Ruth (Graves) Buck's brother. Their parents Thomas and Ruth (Collins) Graves had died in February 1756, and this was why the Bucks had come to Southborough.
I'm not going to rank them all, and I'm going to do them one at a time so I can describe them in some detail - perhaps my experience will help others.
Genea-Discovery: Isaac Buck's (1757-1846) Birth Father
1) One of my most challenging genealogy mysteries has been to identify the father of Isaac Buck, born in 1757 in Southborough MA.
According to the Southborough (Mass.) Town Record book:
"Born to Mary Richards, a son named Isaac Buck reputed by her to be a son of Isaac Buck on Sepr 27, 1757."
This record is on the same page, and just below, the list of children born to Joseph and Mary Richards, including their daughter Mary in 1733.
While browsing through The American Genealogist for 1992, I found an article called "Southborough Mass. Notifications", which included the following:
"I have taken into my house ... a famaley Last from Framingham the
name of Isaac Buck and his wife Ruth and ther Children Susanna and
Joseph, March ye 25:1756. Joseph Richards."
This Joseph Richards is the son of Joseph (died 1748) and Mary (died 1755) Richards who also were the parents of Mary Richards (born 24 September 1733 in Lynn, Mass.). It may be that the young Mary Richards lived with her brother Joseph Richards (and his wife Lydia) when Isaac and Ruth (Graves) Buck moved into the home of Joseph Richards in 1756. Isaac and Ruth went to Southborough to close out her father's estate.
It would appear that Isaac Buck, husband of Ruth, or some other, perhaps younger, Isaac Buck had the opportunity to impregnate Mary Richards. It is most likely to have been a younger Isaac Buck.
In 1765, "spinster Mary Richards" and her siblings conveyed their share of the homestead land to their brother, William Richards. This is the last found record of Mary Richards, and indicates she was known as Mary Richards and not Mary Buck at that time.
A Mary Richards married John Phillips in 1774, according to records in both Southborough and Lancaster, Mass. They had no children recorded.
Isaac Buck, son of Mary Richards, married Martha (Patty) Phillips, daughter of John and Hannah (Brown) Phillips, on 18 May 1780 in Lancaster, Mass.
It is apparent to me that Mary Richards, mother of Isaac Buck, married John Phillips, father of Martha (Patty) Phillips. Isaac and Martha were probably living in the same house in Lancaster MA as teenagers!
But - the question remained - who is the Isaac Buck that fathered Isaac Buck in 1757 by Mary Richards? Was it the older Isaac Buck, husband of Ruth Graves? Or was it another Isaac Buck who was perhaps an unrecorded son of the older Isaac and Ruth (Graves) Buck?
2) The book Genealogical and Personal Memoirs of Worcester County, Massachusetts, edited by Ellery Bickell Crane (new York : The Lewis Publishing Company, 1907), Volume 2, pg. 363, says:
"(V) Isaac Buck, son of Ephraim Buck (IV) was born about 1705 in Woburn Mass or vicinity. He was living at Woburn when he married at Reading Mass, Dec 3 1729, Ruth Graves. Isaac Buck moved to Southboro and with his wife Ruth sold their rights in the estate of her father, Joseph Graves, late of Southboro, Mass, October 19 1757. Among their children were: Isaac, born about 1730; Esther, married at Southboro, May 4 1762, Elisha Bruce Jr.; probably others.
"(VI) Isaac Buck, son of Isaac Buck (V), was born about 1730. He removed to Southboro with his father, and married Mary Richards about 1755. His children: Isaac, born in Southboro, Sept 27 1757, see forward; Susanna, married November 14 1793 Elisha Bemis. The family removed to Bolton, Mass."
It goes on to tell about Isaac Buck's (born 1757) family (he settled finally in Sterling, which was created in 1791 from Lancaster), had a big family with Patty Phillips, and provides several more generations in one line.
3) The question arises: Did the Isaac Buck, born 1730, really exist? There are no vital records for birth, marriage or death, and no land or probate records in Worcester or Middlesex Counties for him. Just because a memoir book says he existed doesn't make it true. The memoir book entry may have been from an earlier family history book or unpublished research efforts.
There are no other Buck records in Southborough town records other than the ones noted above.
The index and abstracts of all Buck probate records in Worcester and Middlesex Counties were reviewed, and do not reveal records for the elder, middle or younger Isaac Buck. Land index records for Worcester County were reviewed, and do not reveal any land bought or sold by any Isaac Buck (except the husband of Ruth) before 1800. There are many listings for other Buck families, including Isaac Buck's (1757-1846) descendants around Sterling MA.
Isaac and Ruth Buck granted land in Southborough to Joseph Graves in 1765. This record was dated 19 October 1757 and registered by the court 29 October 1765. Isaac and Ruth Buck "of Southborough" deeded the property received from their "honoured father Thomas Graves" to Joseph Graves, Ruth (Graves) Buck's brother. Their parents Thomas and Ruth (Collins) Graves had died in February 1756, and this was why the Bucks had come to Southborough.
I transcribed the deed in Amanuensis Monday - Post 204: 1756 Deed of Isaac and Ruth Buck to Joseph Graves in Southborough, Mass. (posted 3 February 2014).
For the purposes of this study, there is a very important statement in the deed:
"...In witness whereof we the said Isaac Buck and Ruth his wife have hereunto put our hands and seals this thirtieth day of December Anno Domini one thousand seven hundred and fifty six and in ye thirtieth year of his majestie's reign, Isaac Buck [seal] and Ruth Buck [seal] signed, sealed and delivered in presence of Isaac Buck Jr [mark] & Ebenr Buck.
Worcester Oct^r 18^th AD 1757 the within named Isaac Buck and Ruth Buck his wife both personally appeared and acknowledged their Signing sealing and delivering the within was their free act and deed." (Worcester County Land Records vol. 65, page 62).
This is the first and only direct evidence of the existence of an Isaac Buck Jr. The senior Isaac Buck is the only Isaac Buck found in the Southborough records in that time period (except for the baby Isaac born in 1757). Why was the deed signed in the presence of Isaac Buck Jr and Ebenezer Buck? My hypothesis is that they were sons of age 18 or more and heirs of Isaac and Ruth Buck. Their other known son, Joseph Buck, was baptized in 1748 and was probably not of age in 1756 when the deed was signed.
4) If I apply the Genealogical Proof Standard, the best piece of evidence I have is this deed, and the information in the deed is primary (Isaac Buck Jr. was a witness to the deed), the source is derivative (but is a microfilm copy of a deed transcription in an official county record book) and the evidence is direct (requires no supporting evidence). There is no other piece of evidence except for the memoir book (which corroborates the deed information), after an exhaustive search for other evidence.
The only conflicting evidence at hand is that there was another Isaac Buck (born 1706) in Southborough at the time, residing, with his wife Ruth, with Joseph Richards, the brother of Mary Richards. Could this older Isaac Buck have been the father of Isaac Buck, born 1757 to Mary Richards? What are the chances that an Isaac Buck age 50 had a child with Mary Richards aged 23? With an extra family (Isaac and Ruth Buck, and probably their son Joseph) in the Joseph Richards household in late 1756 and early 1757, what opportunities would Isaac Buck 1706 have to be alone with a young Mary Richards? It is possible but, in my opinion, not very probable.
This is the first and only direct evidence of the existence of an Isaac Buck Jr. The senior Isaac Buck is the only Isaac Buck found in the Southborough records in that time period (except for the baby Isaac born in 1757). Why was the deed signed in the presence of Isaac Buck Jr and Ebenezer Buck? My hypothesis is that they were sons of age 18 or more and heirs of Isaac and Ruth Buck. Their other known son, Joseph Buck, was baptized in 1748 and was probably not of age in 1756 when the deed was signed.
4) If I apply the Genealogical Proof Standard, the best piece of evidence I have is this deed, and the information in the deed is primary (Isaac Buck Jr. was a witness to the deed), the source is derivative (but is a microfilm copy of a deed transcription in an official county record book) and the evidence is direct (requires no supporting evidence). There is no other piece of evidence except for the memoir book (which corroborates the deed information), after an exhaustive search for other evidence.
The only conflicting evidence at hand is that there was another Isaac Buck (born 1706) in Southborough at the time, residing, with his wife Ruth, with Joseph Richards, the brother of Mary Richards. Could this older Isaac Buck have been the father of Isaac Buck, born 1757 to Mary Richards? What are the chances that an Isaac Buck age 50 had a child with Mary Richards aged 23? With an extra family (Isaac and Ruth Buck, and probably their son Joseph) in the Joseph Richards household in late 1756 and early 1757, what opportunities would Isaac Buck 1706 have to be alone with a young Mary Richards? It is possible but, in my opinion, not very probable.
What are the chances that the father was an Isaac Buck Jr. age 26, perhaps visiting his parents, to impregnate Mary Richards at age 23? We don't know if Isaac Buck 1730 resided with his parents in the house of Joseph Richards or not. He may have visited his parents in late 1756 or early 1757. I think that is very probable. If there was a younger Isaac Buck, an unrecorded son of the older Isaac Buck, then I think that he is probably the father of the baby by Mary Richards.
My conclusion is that Isaac and Ruth (Graves) Buck had a son named Isaac Buck Jr., born around 1730, not recorded in any town record or church record, who fathered Isaac Buck (born 1757) by Mary Richards.
5) What if i'm wrong? Well, if the father of the baby was Isaac Buck 1706, then I retain the Buck ancestry and lose the Graves ancestry in my family tree.
6) Now I wonder what happened to the middle Isaac Buck, born about 1730? The memoir book says he removed to Bolton, Mass. (at least one Isaac Buck entered the Revolutionary War from Bolton - I've always thought it was the Isaac born 1757, who is recognized as a Revolutionary War soldier with a Pension Record). But there are no other records to my knowledge.
Your comments on the research problem and my hypothesis and conclusion are welcome! What have I missed?
My conclusion is that Isaac and Ruth (Graves) Buck had a son named Isaac Buck Jr., born around 1730, not recorded in any town record or church record, who fathered Isaac Buck (born 1757) by Mary Richards.
5) What if i'm wrong? Well, if the father of the baby was Isaac Buck 1706, then I retain the Buck ancestry and lose the Graves ancestry in my family tree.
6) Now I wonder what happened to the middle Isaac Buck, born about 1730? The memoir book says he removed to Bolton, Mass. (at least one Isaac Buck entered the Revolutionary War from Bolton - I've always thought it was the Isaac born 1757, who is recognized as a Revolutionary War soldier with a Pension Record). But there are no other records to my knowledge.
Your comments on the research problem and my hypothesis and conclusion are welcome! What have I missed?
The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/10/my-top-genea-discoveries-isaac-bucks.html
Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver
Amanuensis Monday - Post 239: 1871 Deed of Land in Taylor County, Iowa from A.A and Rebecca Hancock to Devier J. Smith
Genea-blogger John Newmark (who writes the excellent TransylvanianDutch blog) started a Monday blog theme years ago called "Amanuensis Monday." John offers this definition for "amanuensis:"
"A person employed to write what another dictates or to copy what has been written by another."
The subject today is an 1871 deed in the Taylor County, Iowa deed books for A.A. and Rebecca Hancock selling land to Devier J. Smith.
The transcription of this deed is (handwritten text in italics, form fields underlined):
01 DEED RECORD, TAYLOR CO., IOWA
=================================================
02 A A Hancock } Filed for record, this 20 day of December A.D. 18 71
03 } at 2 o'clock, P. M.
04 To: D.J. Smith }
05 } E.G. Medford, Recorder
06
=================================================
07 Know all Men by these Presents:
08 That We A A Hancock and
09 Rebecca Hancock of the County of Taylor and State of Iowa
10 in consideration of the sum of Three Thousand Dollars,
11 in hand paid by Devier J. Smith
12 of Taylor County and State of Iowa do hereby SELL AND CONVEY
13 unto the said Devier J. Smith the following
14 described premises, situated in the County of Taylor and State of Iowa to wit:
15 The South East Quarter of the South East Quarter of Sect. No Eleven
16 (11) and the North East Qr of the N E 1/4 of Sect. fourteen (14)
17 all in Township No Sixty Seven (67) Range Thirty three (33) West.
18 and We hereby covenant with the said Devier J. Smith
19 that We hold said premises by good and perfect title, that We have good right and lawful authority to sell
20 and convey the same; that they are free and clear of all liens and incumbrances whatsoever, And We covenant
21 to WARRANT AND DEFEND the said premises, against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. And the said
22 Rebecca Hancock
23 hereby relinquishes her right of dower in and to the above described premises.
======================================
24 Signed this 18th day of December A.D. 18 71
25 IN PRESENCE OF { $ 3.00 U.S. Rev.Stamp } A A Hancock
26 {Annexed and Cancelled by } Rebecca X Hancock
27 { A A H & R H 18 dec 71 }
28 STATE OF IOWA, Taylor County SS
29 On this 18th day of December A.D. 18 71 , before me James P. Hick
30 a Notary Public within and for said County, personally came A A Hancock &
31 Rebecca Hancock personally known to be the identical person s whose
32 name s are affixed to the above instrument as Grantor s , and acknowledged the same
33 to be Their voluntary act and deed, for the purposes therein expressed.
34 In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed my
35 official seal at Bedford Iowa on the date last above written.
36 J.P. Hick
37 Notary Public
============================================
38 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original deed, as filed for record on the
39 20 day of December 18 71
40 E.G. Medford Recorder.
The source citation for this Deed is:
Taylor County, Iowa, Taylor County, Iowa, deed records, 1855-1953; index, 1855-1902, "Deed Records (Land) v. O (cont'd), 1873-1874, v. P 1871-1873, v. Q (to p.391)" Volume P, page 91 (stamped), Deed of A A and Rebecca Hancock to Devier J. Smith, 1871; accessed 4 February 2014 on FHL US/CAN microfilm 1,535,635.
This is a new purchase of land. Devier J. Smith had sold many of the lots in Section 23 of Section 68 in the months previous, and he then bought these two parcels.
Devier J. and Abby A. Smith are my second great-grandparents. By 1875, they were residing in Concordia, Cloud County, Kansas. Subsequently, they moved to McCook, Red Willow County, Nebraska in 1885, and then bought land in Cheyenne County, Kansas before Devier died in 1894 in McCook. Abby came to San Diego to live with her daughter's family in the early 1890s.
The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/10/amanuensis-monday-post-239-1871-deed-of.html
Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver
Sunday, October 12, 2014
Best of the Genea-Blogs - 5 to 11 October 2014
Hundreds of genealogy and family history bloggers write thousands of posts every week about their research, their families, and their interests. I appreciate each one of them and their efforts.
My criteria for "Best of ..." are pretty simple - I pick posts that advance knowledge about genealogy and family history, address current genealogy issues, provide personal family history, are funny or are poignant. I don't list posts destined for daily blog prompts or meme submissions (but I do include summaries of them), or my own posts.
Here are my picks for great reads from the genealogy blogs for this past week:
* Planning an Ancestral Trip by Penny Stratton on the Vita Brevis blog. Penny outlines some research strategies for visiting the homeland of your ancestors.
* Genealogy Should Be Free -- Say What? by Lorine McGinnis Schulze on the Olive Tree Genealogy Blog. Lorine rebuts the statement, noting that there are costs and tradeoffs for every website.
* Books Are Still Better and Beautiful and Terrifying by Jacqi Stevens on A Family Tapestry blog. Jacqi is in Tipperary tracking down her Irish ancestors, and acquires a local history book. Then they drive to an ancestral townland.
* Your Online Genealogy Tips by Janet Hovorka on The Chart Chick blog. Janet received some excellent research tips on her Facebook page.
* When Less is More by Judy G. Russell on The Legal Genealogist blog. Judy reviews what she learned at the Ancestry DNA day.
* DNA Day at Ancestry by Roberta J. Estes on the DNAeXplained - Genetic Genealogy blog. Roberta summarizes her experiences at Ancestry's DNA day.
* Wordless Wednesday -- I'm Published and Finding Della ... Again (The Power of Offline Records) by Schalene Dagutis on the Tangled Roots and Trees blog. Schalene's article in a British magazine resulted in a reader helping her find more about Della, her third cousin.
* 5 Reasons You Should Take a Genealogy Break by Kenneth R. Marks on The Ancestor Hunt blog. Ken suggests ways to refresh your genealogy records.
* #Gaenovium and #Famillement in Tweets by Louis Kessler on Louis Kessler's Behold Blog. Louis attended these events in Leiden, Holland and shares tweets from the events.
* Scholarships, Awards and Cash Prizes . . Oh My! by Sheri Fenley on The Educated Genealogist blog. Sheri lists the available benefits.
* Tenth Annual Family Tree DNA Conference, Opening Reception; Day 2 by Roberta J. Estes on the DNAeXplained - Genetic Genealogy blog. Roberta summarizes the FTDNA Conference to date. The Day 2 is about Spencer Wells presentation - fascinating!
* Looking at the Process of doing Genealogical Research by James Tanner on the Genealogy's Star blog. Can "anyone be a genealogist?" James address this - he says there are critical abilities required.
These genea-bloggers wrote weekly pick posts and news summary posts this week:
* GAGs - GeniAus Gems - 10 October 2014 by Jill Ball on the GeniAus blog.
* Recommended Reads by Linda S. on the Empty Branches on the Family Tree blog.
* Friday Finds and Follows: 10 October 2014 by Miriam J. Robbins on the Ancestories: The Stories of My Ancestors blog.
* Follow Friday ~ Fab Finds for October 10, 2014 by Jana Last on Jana's Genealogy and Family History Blog.
* Blog Posts and News Stories for Genealogists, October 10, 2014 by Michael J. Leclerc on the Mocavo Genealogy Blog.
* Friday Finds - 10/10/14 by Julie Cahill Tarr on Julie's Genealogy & History Hub blog.
* Creme de la Creme -- October 11, 2014 by Gail Dever on the Genealogy a la Carte blog.
* Saturday Serendipity (October 11, 2014) by John D. Tew on the Filiopietism Prism blog.
Readers are encouraged to go to the blogs listed above and read their articles, and add their blogs to your Favorites, Feedly, another RSS feed, or email if you like what you read. Please make a comment to them also - all bloggers appreciate feedback on what they write.
Did I miss a great genealogy blog post? Tell me! I am currently reading posts from over 1540 genealogy bloggers using Feedly, but I still miss quite a few it seems.
Read past Best of the Genea-Blogs posts here.
The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/10/best-of-genea-blogs-5-to-11-october-2014.html
Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver
My criteria for "Best of ..." are pretty simple - I pick posts that advance knowledge about genealogy and family history, address current genealogy issues, provide personal family history, are funny or are poignant. I don't list posts destined for daily blog prompts or meme submissions (but I do include summaries of them), or my own posts.
Here are my picks for great reads from the genealogy blogs for this past week:
* Planning an Ancestral Trip by Penny Stratton on the Vita Brevis blog. Penny outlines some research strategies for visiting the homeland of your ancestors.
* Genealogy Should Be Free -- Say What? by Lorine McGinnis Schulze on the Olive Tree Genealogy Blog. Lorine rebuts the statement, noting that there are costs and tradeoffs for every website.
* Books Are Still Better and Beautiful and Terrifying by Jacqi Stevens on A Family Tapestry blog. Jacqi is in Tipperary tracking down her Irish ancestors, and acquires a local history book. Then they drive to an ancestral townland.
* Your Online Genealogy Tips by Janet Hovorka on The Chart Chick blog. Janet received some excellent research tips on her Facebook page.
* When Less is More by Judy G. Russell on The Legal Genealogist blog. Judy reviews what she learned at the Ancestry DNA day.
* DNA Day at Ancestry by Roberta J. Estes on the DNAeXplained - Genetic Genealogy blog. Roberta summarizes her experiences at Ancestry's DNA day.
* Wordless Wednesday -- I'm Published and Finding Della ... Again (The Power of Offline Records) by Schalene Dagutis on the Tangled Roots and Trees blog. Schalene's article in a British magazine resulted in a reader helping her find more about Della, her third cousin.
* 5 Reasons You Should Take a Genealogy Break by Kenneth R. Marks on The Ancestor Hunt blog. Ken suggests ways to refresh your genealogy records.
* #Gaenovium and #Famillement in Tweets by Louis Kessler on Louis Kessler's Behold Blog. Louis attended these events in Leiden, Holland and shares tweets from the events.
* Scholarships, Awards and Cash Prizes . . Oh My! by Sheri Fenley on The Educated Genealogist blog. Sheri lists the available benefits.
* Tenth Annual Family Tree DNA Conference, Opening Reception; Day 2 by Roberta J. Estes on the DNAeXplained - Genetic Genealogy blog. Roberta summarizes the FTDNA Conference to date. The Day 2 is about Spencer Wells presentation - fascinating!
* Looking at the Process of doing Genealogical Research by James Tanner on the Genealogy's Star blog. Can "anyone be a genealogist?" James address this - he says there are critical abilities required.
These genea-bloggers wrote weekly pick posts and news summary posts this week:
* GAGs - GeniAus Gems - 10 October 2014 by Jill Ball on the GeniAus blog.
* Recommended Reads by Linda S. on the Empty Branches on the Family Tree blog.
* Friday Finds and Follows: 10 October 2014 by Miriam J. Robbins on the Ancestories: The Stories of My Ancestors blog.
* Follow Friday ~ Fab Finds for October 10, 2014 by Jana Last on Jana's Genealogy and Family History Blog.
* Blog Posts and News Stories for Genealogists, October 10, 2014 by Michael J. Leclerc on the Mocavo Genealogy Blog.
* Friday Finds - 10/10/14 by Julie Cahill Tarr on Julie's Genealogy & History Hub blog.
* Creme de la Creme -- October 11, 2014 by Gail Dever on the Genealogy a la Carte blog.
* Saturday Serendipity (October 11, 2014) by John D. Tew on the Filiopietism Prism blog.
Readers are encouraged to go to the blogs listed above and read their articles, and add their blogs to your Favorites, Feedly, another RSS feed, or email if you like what you read. Please make a comment to them also - all bloggers appreciate feedback on what they write.
Did I miss a great genealogy blog post? Tell me! I am currently reading posts from over 1540 genealogy bloggers using Feedly, but I still miss quite a few it seems.
Read past Best of the Genea-Blogs posts here.
The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2014/10/best-of-genea-blogs-5-to-11-october-2014.html
Copyright (c) 2014, Randall J. Seaver
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





