Friday, April 28, 2017

This Week's We're Related Relationships - 28 April 2017

I received 11 new cousin relationships on the We're Related mobile app over the last two weeks, which is based on a "Big" Ancestry Trees which is, apparently, unsourced.  The new relationships, and my initial evaluation of them, are:

1)  Sir Walter Scott -- Author, 5th cousin 7x removed, common ancestor is Robert Whitney (1543-1612).  

The app says my line to Robert Whitney goes through son Thomas Whitney (1550-1637) and grandson John Whitney (1592-1673) of Watertown, Mass.  However, there is an obvious problem there with Robert Whitney having a son Thomas at 7 years old.  There is scholarship that indicates that Thomas Whitney's father was Robert Whitney (1498-1555) of Hertfordshire.  Therefore, the app has my line wrong.  I don't know about Walter Scott's line. My judgment is that this relationship is Unlikely.

2)  Stevie Ray Vaughan -- Musician, 8th cousin 1x removed, common ancestor is Anne Bartlett (1684-1721).

My line to Anne Bartlett is through son Joseph Colby (1707-1768), while Stevie's is to Benaiah Colby (1705-1746), who I have as a brother to my Joseph.  My judgment is that this relationship is Likely.

3)  Peggy Lauritzen -- Facebook friend, 9th cousin, common ancestor is Henry Bennett (1664-1739).

My line to Henry Bennett (who married Frances Barr in 1685) of Ipswich, Mass. is through his daughter, Mary Bennett (1685-1717), who married Nathaniel Knowlton. Peggy's line is through his son John Bennett (1680-1730), who I do not have in my database as a son Henry Bennett.  There are a number of Ancestry Member Trees with John Bennett's parents being Henry Bennett and Sarah Champion of New London, Conn.  My guess is that the Ancestry "Big Tree" used for these relationships conflated the two Henry Bennetts into one person.  My judgment is that this relationship is Unlikely.

4)  Thomas Watson -- Scientist, 6th cousin 5x removed, common ancestor is Thomas Farrar (1615-1694).

The app says my line to Thomas Farrar adds 5 generations to the ancestry of Jerusha (--?--) Metcalf (1750-1817).  Nobody knows who Jerusha's parents are, even the Ancestry "Big Tree."  My judgment is that this relationship is Wrong.

5)  Michelle Williams -- Actress, 9th cousin, common ancestor is Samuel Blodgett (1658-1743).

My line to Samuel Blodgett goes through daughter Huldah Blodgett (1689-1777), while Michelle's line goes through Joshua Blodgett (1694-1756), who I have as a brother to my Huldah.  My judgment is that this relationship is Very Likely.

6)  Randy Clark -- Facebook friend, 7th cousin 1x removed, common ancestor is Rebecca Drake (1697-1749).

The app says that Rebecca Drake is them other of Samuel Fitz Randolph (1730-????) of Woodbridge, N.J.  I don't know the name of Samuel's mother, but I know that his father is Jacob Fitz Randolph (1706-1779).  Randy's line goes through a Private person (why?) who is the apparent father of Catherine Randolph (1739-1826), who married a Jackson.  The Fitz Randolph book says that Rebecca Drake married Joseph Fitz Randolph (1691-1750) in 1712 and had 13 children.  The Fitz Randolph book also says that Catherine Randolph born in 1739 was the daughter of Edward Fitz Randolph (1706-1750).  I think that the app has messed up Randy's line.  My judgment is that this specific relationship is Unlikely, but since we both have Fitz Randolph, we are likely 9th cousins.

7)  Neil Patrick Harris - Actor, 8th cousin 1x removed, common ancestor is Anna Barbara --?-- (1664-1783).

The app adds two generations to my ancestor Maria Magdalena Ritter (1706-1784).  Neil's line goes through a daughter Anna Maria --?-- (1725-1784) and a grandson John Nicholas Radabaugh (1752-1850).  So Anna Barbara --?-- lived 119 years and had a daughter Anna Maria at age 61.  That doesn't look right to me.  My judgment is that this relationship is Unlikely.  

8)  Beth King -- Facebook friend, 8th cousin 1x removed, common ancestor is Nathaniel Soule (1637-1699).

My line to Nathaniel Soule is through his son Jacob Soule (1687-1747), while Beth's line goes through son Nathaniel Soule (1681-1766), whom I have as a brother to my Jacob in my database.  My judgment is that this relationship is Very Likely.

9)  Cindy Scherwinski -- Facebook friend, 8th cousin 1x removed, common ancestor is Adam Mott (1623-1711).

My line to Adam Mott of Portsmouth, R.I. is through his daughter Elizabeth Mott (1659-1723), who married Matthew Wing.  Cindy's line is through Gershom Mott (1653-1733).  I don't have Gershom Mott as a son to Adam Mott (1623-1711).  There are many online trees that show Gershom Mott was the son of Adam Mott (1619-1693) who married Jane Hulet.  There were several Mott families in New York and Rhode Island in the 1640-1700 time frame.  It may be that the Ancestry "Big Tree" has conflated two Adam Motts to create this relationship.  My judgment is that this relationship is Possible.

10)  Mike Huckabee -- Politician, 9th cousin 1x removed, common ancestor is George Brown (1651-1721).

My line to George Brown of Eastham, Mass. is through his son Samuel Brown (1686-1739), while Mike's line is through Samuel Brown (1694-1769).  Two Samuel Browns!  Many Ancestry Member Trees indicate that Samuel Brown (1694-1769) was the son of George Brown of Bucks County, Pennsylvania, not of Eastham, Mass.  Again, the app has apparently conflated two or more George Brown persons.  My judgment is that this relationship is Wrong.

11)  Les Brown -- Musician, 9th cousin, common ancestor is Anna Merz (1641-1705).

Who the heck is Anna Merz?  The app added three generations to the ancestry of my Michael Able (1719-1791) of New Jersey.  Les's line goes through son Peter Maier (1672-1741) in Germany.  My judgment is that this relationship is Unlikely.

My count is up to 222 famous or Facebook cousins provided by the app.  This week, my judgment is that 3 of the 11 cousin relationships are Likely or better.

The app may be right -- I don't know for sure -- and I can't really find out because the app provides no source material to back up their assertions.  If there was authoritative information for my end-of-line ancestors, I would add it.  None of the "Unlikely" or "Wrong" relationships have been convincing to me yet.



=======================================


Copyright (c) 2017, Randall J. Seaver


Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.


New Records Available To Search This Findmypast Friday, 28 April 2017

I received this information from Findmypast via email today:

================================================


New Records Available To Search This Findmypast Friday


There are over 782,000 new records available to search this weekend, including;

Kent Baptisms
Over 18,000 records have been added to our collection of Kent Baptisms. The new additions cover the parishes of from Bapchild, Brompton, Chatham, New Gillingham, Wingham and Wittersham. Kent Baptisms spans the years 1538 to 1988 and covers 127 parishes across the English County. Each record includes a transcript of the original source material that will allow you to find out when your ancestor was born, when and where they were baptised, their residence, parent’s names and father’s occupation. A number may also reveal additional information such as the mother’s maiden name and/or additional notes.

Kent Banns
Over 3,000 records have been added to our collection of Kent Banns. The new additions cover the parishes of Bapchild, Biddenden, and Wittersham. Each record includes a transcript of the original banns book that will reveal the couple’s names, their home parishes, marital status, where their banns were announced and the date they were read.

Kent Marriages
A whopping 312,000 new records have been added to our collection of Kent parish marriage records. The new additions cover the parishes of Bapchild, Biddenden, Kilndown, Tenterden, and Wittersham. The entire collection now contains over 693,000 records from over 149 parishes across the county. Each transcript will reveal information about both your ancestor and their spouse, allowing you to effectively add a whole new branch to your family tree. Each record will reveal the couple’s names, birth years, occupations, father’s names, father’s occupations, residence, witnesses, marriage date and location. 

Kent Burials
Over 18,000 new records covering the parishes of Bapchild, Kilndown, Tenterden, and Wittersham have been added to our collection of Kent Burials. The entire collection now contains over 421,000 records covering 116 parishes across the county. Each transcript will reveal your ancestors age at death and their residence as well as when and where they were laid to rest. A number of records may also reveal additional information such as their occupation, dedication and notes on their marital status, parent’s names and whether they were a “foundling”.

North West Kent Baptisms
Over 23,000 records have been added to our collection of North West Kent Baptisms. North West Kent, is used to describe areas within the London boroughs which were historically part of Kent. Each record includes a transcript that will reveal your ancestors birth date, residence, the date and location of their baptism, parent’s names and father’s occupation.

North West Kent Burials
An additional 15,000 records have been added to our collection of North West Kent Burials that will allow you to discover if your ancestor was buried in the Garden of England. Each transcript will reveal your ancestor’s age at death, residence, place of burial and burial date. A number of records may also include a brief description and/or additional notes.

Irish Newspapers
Over 401,089 new articles and one brand new title have been added to our collection of historic Irish Newspapers. The Ballymena Weekly Telegraph is the latest publication to join the collection and currently covers the years 1904, 1906-1916, 1921-1929 and 1931-1957.


=============================================

Disclosure:  I have a complimentary subscription for Findmypast.com, which does not affect my objectivity toward the company.

The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2017/04/new-records-available-to-search-this_28.html

Copyright (c) 2017, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.


52 Ancestors - Week 173: #252 Peter Victorse Putman (1760-1835) of New Jersey and New York

Here is my 52 Ancestors biography for week #173:

Peter Victorse Putman (1760-1835)  is #252 on my Ahnentafel List, my 5th great-grandfather, who married #253 Sarah Kinnan (1764-1841)   in 1780, in Wantage, New Jersey.

I am descended through:

*  their son, #126 John Putman (1785-1863), who married #127 Sarah Martin (1792-1860) in 1810.
*  their daughter, #63 Elizabeth Putman (1818-1895)  who married #62 Alexander Sovereen (1814-1907), in 1840.
*  their daughter, #31 Mary Jane Sovereen (1840-1874), who married #30 James Abraham Kemp (1831-1902) in 1861.
*  their daughter #15 Georgianna Kemp (1868-1952) who married #14 Charles Auble (1849-1916),  in 1898.
*  their daughter #7 Emily Kemp Auble (1899-1977) who married #6 Lyle Lawrence Carringer (1891-1976) in 1918.
* their daughter #3 Betty Virginia Carringer (1919-2002), who married #2 Frederick Walton Seaver (1911-1983), in 1942.
*  their son #1 Randall J. Seaver (1943-....)

 =====================================================

1)  PERSON (with source citations as indicated in brackets):


*  Name:                         Peter Victorse Putman
*  Alternate Name:           Peter Putman[1-2]   

*  Sex:                             Male   

*  Father:                        Victor Davidse Putman (1721-1765)   
*  Mother:                      Margriet Wies (1726-    )   
  
2)  INDIVIDUAL EVENTS (with source citations as indicated in brackets):
  
*  Birth:                         about 1760, Wantage, Sussex, New Jersey, United States[1]   
*  Military:                    5 March 1778 (about age 18), Sussex, New Jersey, United States[2]
*  Census:                     1 June 1810 (about age 50), Ulysses, Tompkins, New York, United States[3]
*  Census:                     1 June 1820 (about age 60), Wayne, Steuben, New York, United States[4]    
*  Pension:                    2 February 1825 (about age 65), Steuben, New York, United States[2]   
*  Census:                    1 June 1830 (about age 70), Barrington, Yates, New York, United States[5]   
*  Death:                      3 October 1835 (about age 75), Barrington, Yates, New York, United States[2]   
3)  SHARED EVENTS (with source citations as indicated in brackets):
   
*  Spouse 1:                 Sarah Mary Kinnan (1761-1841)   
*  Marriage 1:              20 March 1780 (about age 20, Wantage, Sussex, New Jersey, United States[2]

*  Child 1:                   Victor Putman (1782-1845)   
*  Child 2:                   John Putman (1785-1863)   
*  Child 3:                   Peter Putman (1788-1855)   
*  Child 4:                   David Putman (1790-1855)   
*  Child 5:                   Isaac Kinnan Putman (1796-1875)   
  
4)  NOTES (with source citations as indicated in brackets):   

Much of the data presented on the Putman family was obtained from Mark Putman, who published the Putman Family Bulletin for several years.  One of his publications, " David Janse Putman," covers the present ancestral line.  Additional information about this family is on Mark Putnam's web page at http://www.putmanfamily.org/Family/David%20Janse%20Pottman.pdf (as of April 2017)[1].

Peter Putman was born during the French and Indian War, probably about 1760 in Sussex County, New Jersey, the son of Victor and Margaret (Weis) Putman[1].  

He served in the Revolutionary War as a private in Captain Holmes Company in the 3rd Regiment in the New Jersey Continental Line.  Enlisting on 5 March 1778, he fought in the Battle of Monmouth New Jersey on 28 June 1778, which was a turning point in the War.  Peter Putman later was at the smaller Battle of Pompton Plains, New Jersey.  He was probably at Valley Forge during the spring encampment and he also served in Captain Harker's Company in the 2nd Regiment of the Sussex County Militia serving six weeks in 1780.  Peter was discharged from the military at the hospital in Princeton, New Jersey 1 October 1780.  He attained the rank of Captain following the Revolution in the Sussex County (NJ) State Militia[1,2].

Peter Putman married Sarah Kinnan (or Canaan) on 20 March 1780 in Wantage township, Sussex County, New Jersey, according to his pension record[2].  Sarah was born in June 1761, and her parents are probably John and Martha (Morrison) Kinnan of Wantage township.  Peter and Sarah resided in Wantage after their marriage, and then they lived in Sandyston township after the war ended, where they owned land on the Delaware River[1].  They had at least five children, born between 1782 to 1796, probably born in Sussex County, New Jersey[1].

A land deed between Henry Cuyler, perhaps Collier, of Greenbush, Rensselaer County, New York, and Peter Putman dated May 19, 1800, indicates that Henry Cuyler had purchased 1,500 acres of land along the Delaware River in Sandyston, New Jersey (from James Parker of Perth Amboy), and on this date conveyed 152 acres to Peter Putman. Witnesses to the transaction were Even Bevens, Mathias Clark, and Thomas Anderson the later an officer of the High Court of Chancery. Consideration was 152 Pounds, or 1 Pound per acre[1].

The 1793 Military Census of New Jersey shows the Peter Putman homestead as located in the Beven's Post Office area north of Peter's Valley.  Peter and Sarah bough land in Sussex County in 1801 and 1808[1].

In a June 20, 1808, deed, Peter and Sarah Putman of Sandyston, New Jersey, conveyed 141 perches of land in Sandyston to James Van Auken of the Township of Montague.  The consideration was $1,500. Witnesses were Jacob Hornbeck and Isaac Van Auken.  The land sold butted the southeast corner of 52 acres Peter Putman had previously sold to Andrew Dingman and he to Jacob Smith[1].

Following the paths of other Revolutionary War veterans of Sussex County, by 1810 Peter Putman may have removed to Seneca County, New York, where a Peter Putman was listed in that year's census near Joseph Cannan and Ephraim Rolfe in the Town of Ulysses.  Ulysses became a part of Tompkins County[1].

In the 1810 US Census for Ulysses, Seneca county, New York, the Peter Putman family had[3]:

*  one male under age 10
*  one male aged 10 to 16 (perhaps son Isaac)
*  one male aged 16-25 (perhaps son David, Peter or John)
* one male aged 25 to 45 (perhaps son Victor)
* one male over age 45 (certainly Peter)
* one female aged 10 to 16
* one female aged 16 to 25 (perhaps a wife of a son)
* one female over age 45 (likely Sarah)

During, or shortly after, the War of 1812, the family moved to Wayne township, Steuben County, New York, as did many Revolutionary War veterans.  Peter's sons may have worked in the lumbering industry, which was the second most common occupation following agriculture in Steuben County[1].

According to the History of Yates County, New York, Joseph Kinnan, and his wife, and Peter Putnam, and his wife, helped in the founding of the Methodist Church of Barrington in 1810.

In the 1820 United States Census, Peter Putman was listed in the Town of Wayne, Steuben County, New York next to Victor Putman[4].  The household included:

*  one male aged over 45 (certainly Peter)
*  one female aged over 45 (likely Sarah)

Peter Putman and his sons probably worked in the lumber woods during the winter months and farmed during the summer.  Lumbering was a common occupation of Steuben County.  Loggers constructed rafts of lumber on Mud Lake just south of Barrington and floated them down the Susquehanna River to Pennsylvania and Maryland[1].

In the 1830 United States Census, Peter Putman was listed in the Town of Barrington, Yates County, New York next to Victor Putman[5].  The household included:

*  one male aged 30 and 40 (perhaps son Isaac)
*  one male aged  70 and 80 (certainly Peter)
*  one female aged 60 and 70 (likely Sarah)

After Peter died, on October 3, 1835, at age 75 in Yates County, New York, Sarah received Peter's Revolutionary War pension[2].  On August 30, 1838, Sarah at 76 years 2 months was living with her son David Putman in Barrington.  She afterward lived with her son, Peter, Jr., and died at his home in Springwater, New York, November 22, 1841, at 80 years old[1].

The Revolutionary War Pension File for Peter Putman included the following affidavit and inventory[2]:

"State of New York County of Steuben: On this second day of February 1825 personally appeared in open Court being a court of record for said County Peter Putman aged sixty five years resident in the town of Barrington in the said County who being first duly sworn according to law doth on his oath made the following declaration in order to obtain the provision made by the acts of Congress of the 18th March 1818 and then 1st May 1820.  That he the said Peter Putman enlisted for the term of two years during the revolutionary war on or about the 5th day of March 1778 in the State of New Jersey in the company commanded by Captain Holmes in the 2d Regiment commanded by Colonel Dayton in the line of the State of New Jersey on the continental establishment: that he continued to serve in the said corps until about the 1st October 1780 when he was discharged from the said service at Princeton in the State of New Jersey from the hospital that he was in the battle of Monmouth and also in another battle which was fought in the State of New Jersey, which battle used to go by the name of the Pompton battle: that he received a written discharge from said service signed as the declarant believes by the said Colonel Dayton and which discharge was delivered to him by the Surgeon and which discharge he has long since lost and cannot now produce: that he has no other evidence now in his power of his said services except the affidavits of Moor Wilson & John Jolly, that the said Moor Wilson is very old and infirm and is now confined to his bed in consequence of a fall; and that the said John Jolly now resides fifty four miles from Bath in the said County of Steuben, is old and very weak and infirm and cannot as this declarant believes endure so long a journey - That the family of this declarant consists of himself and his wife Sarah aged 64 years, neither of whom are able to work much being afflicted with rheumatism.  That he made a declaration in writing of his said services before Thomas McBurney Esq. first Judge of the County of Steuben on the 3d February 1820: that he hereby relinquishes every claim whatsoever to a pension except the present: that his name is not on the roll of any State except that of New York, and that the following are the reasons for not making earlier application for a pension: that he did not wish to be dependent on his country while he was able to maintain himself and wife: that owing to sickness and misfortunes he has become unable to work and is quite reduced in his circumstances - and in pursuance of the act of 1st May 1820 I do solemnly swear that I was a resident citizen of the United States on the eighteenth day of March 1818 and that I have not since that time by gift sale or in any manner disposed of my property or any part thereof with intent thereby so to diminish it as to bring myself within the provisions of an act of Congress entitled "An act to provide for certain persons engaged in the land and naval service of the United States in the revolutionary war" passed on the 18th day of March 1818 and that I have not nor had any other person in trust for me any property or securities contracts or debts due to me nor have I any income other than what is contained in the schedule hereto annexed and by me subscribed.  That I am a farmer by occupation but owing to my advanced age and rheumatic complaints I am not able to do much labor.
........................................................Peter Putman

"Sworn to and declared on the 2d day of February 1825 before me: John Metcalfe, Clerk of Steuben County."

"Property in former Schedule
Real estate I have none
Personal estate
one cow which will be 8 years old next spring $10
two calves which will be one year old next spring $8
four sheep common blood $4
Ten pigs four or five months old very small $2
One old feather bed - been in use thirty years small Slight $4
Two old and worn blankets & one coverlet also old & worn $1.50
Two old linen sheets $0.50
An old indifferent ash bedstead $0.35
An old 3 pail kettle & one other old small kettle both cracked & hooped $1.50
An old table broken & split cost one dollar when purchased $0.25
An old chest been in wear thirty years $0.25
An old small trunk been in use as long $0.13
Three pewter plates $0.38
4 small earthen plates $0.12
2 old knives & 3 forks $0.12
6 old iron spoons $0.18
3 old earthen tea cups &saucers $0.06
One old axe & one old hoe $0.75
One old worn out mowing scythe $0.25

"Schedule of property
Real estate I have none
One two year old steer $8
One yearling heifer $6
Three shotes $3
One chest $1
One small trunk $1
One dinner kettle $1
One tea kettle $1
One pan $0.75
Six earthen plates $0.37
Three chairs $1
One table $1
Three tea cups & saucers $0.12
One large wheel $1
Two earthen crocks $0.25
One bucket $0.25
One churn $0.50
Two Barrels $1
Several knives & forks say 5 $0.25
Two basons $0.50
Two bowls $0.12
One old waggon $15
[Total owned"]  $43.62

"And that since the exhibition of the former schedule the following changes have taken place in my property -
The Cow mentioned therein died last spring
The two calves have been killed for provisions for my family
The four sheep have been sold for grain for the use of my family
The four pigs have been killed for provisions for the use of my family

"That I am indebted to Abraham P. Vosburgh Esq. of Penn Yan for a plough which I have since parted with to pay Doctors bill $14
To Daniel Shannon for carding & fulling $12.80
To William Babcock for pork for provisions for my family $10
To. Mrs. Ellsworth for do for do $5
[Total owed] $41.80"

After Peter Putman's death, his widow, Sarah, continued receiving his pension.  She wrote an affidavit, which is included in the Revolutionary War Pension File (W 7,501) about her qualifications for the pension on 3 August 1836[2]:

"State of New York
County of Yates.

"Then this 3d day of August personally appeared before Court of Common Pleas of the county of Yates Sarah Putman, a resident of the town of Barrington in the county of Yates and State of New York, aged seventy six years and two months, who being first duly sworn according to Law, doth on her oath make the following declaration in order to obtain the benefit of the provision made by the Act of Congress passed July 4th 1836. That she is the widow of Peter Putman, who was draughted out of Hankinson Regiment about the year 1780 under Captain Joseph Horker and served in the New Jersey Militia for about six weeks. She further declared that she was married to the said Peter Putman on the 20th day of March in 1780 that her husband the aforesaid Peter Putman died on the 3 day of October in the year 1835 and that she has remained a widow ever since that period as will more fully appear by reference to the proof hereto annexed.

"Sworn to and subscribed on ...................................... her
the day and year above written .......................... Sarah X Putman
before me ................................................................. mark
A.W. Woodworth Co. Ck."

This affidavit by Peter Putman's widow provides more biographical information, including the approximate month and year of her birth and the marriage date of Peter and Sarah (Kinnan) Putman. She recounts additional service by her husband in 1780 for some reason (probably related to the Act of Congress on 4 July 1836). 

No death, cemetery or probate records have been found for Peter Putman in Yates County, New York records.
 
5)  SOURCES

1. Mark R. Putman, The Putman Family Bulletin, website  (http://www.putmanfamily.org/), "David Janse Putman," Peter Putman sketch, pages 32 to 43 (accessed 27 April 2017).

2. "Revolutionary War Pension and Bounty-Land Warrant Application Files,"  online database with digital images, Fold3.com (http://www.Fold3.com) : accessed 12 December 2007), Pension application W 17501, New Jersey, Peter Putman of Steuben County, New York.

3. 1810 United States Federal Census, Seneca County, New York, population schedule, Ulysses town, page 297, Peter Putman household, indexed database and digital image, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com); citing National Archives Microfilm Publication M292, Roll 36.

4. 1820 United States Federal Census, Population Schedule, Steuben County, New York, population schedule, Wayne town, page 249, Peter Putman household, indexed database and digital image, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com), citing National Archives Microfilm Publication M33, Roll 74.

5. 1830 United States Federal Census, Population Schedule, Yates County, New York, population schedule, Barrington town; Page 244, Peter Putman household, indexed database and digital image, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com), citing National Archives Microfilm Publication M19,  Roll 117.

=======================================

NOTE:  Amy Johnson Crow suggested a weekly blog theme of "52 Ancestors" in her blog post Challenge:  52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks on the No Story Too Small blog.  I have extended this theme in 2017 to 208 Ancestors in 208 Weeks.




Copyright (c) 2017, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.

Thursday, April 27, 2017

Seavers in the News - Disputing Sarah A.C. Seaver's Will

It's time for another episode of Seavers in the News, wherein I find a newspaper article about a person with the surname Seaver who has had something interesting printed in a newspaper.

This week's article is from the Baltimore Sun newspaper, dated 28 June 1900:


The transcription of the article is:

"AGAINST MISS SEAVER'S WILL

"She Left $250 Each to Orphans' and Confederate Homes

"A caveat to the will of Miss Sarah A.C. Seaver, who died the 10th of last April, was filed in Orphans' Court yesterday by her cousins, Charles L. Davis, Gilbert A. Davis, James M. Miller, Mary F. Herrick, Charles A. Miller, M.M. Miller, William A. Miller, John O. Miller, Samuel S. Davis and Sarah Anna Gordan, through Willis & Homer, attorneys. Letters on the estate were granted April 17 to James W. Denny and William L. Lyon, who were named as executors.

"The will in dispute was executed December 5, 1898.  It bequeaths $250 each to St. Mary's Catholic Orphan Asylum, the Protestant Orphan Asylum on Stricker street and the Confederate Home at Pikesville.  After the payment of three and a number of other small bequests the residue of the estate is left to Alverda Fullerton Schumacher, Isabella Fullerton, Mrs. Garafilla C. Lyon and Wilhelmina Friedly, friends of the testatrix.

"The value of the estate is about $15,000.  The main allegation against the validity of the will is that Miss Seaver was of unsound mind when it was executed."

The source citation for this article is:

"AGAINST MISS SEAVER'S WILL," Baltimore [Md.] Sun newspaper, online index and digital image, GenealogyBank (http://www.genealogybank.com : accessed 27 April 2017), Thursday, 28 June 1900, page 7.

From the article, I figured that Miss Sarah A.C. Seaver died unmarried, and I found her in my RootsMagic database, born in 1816 in Baltimore, Maryland, the daughter of William Seaver (1782-1821) and Martha (Davis) (Seaver) Bowen (1793-1868).  Then I recalled that I had found information about the murder of her father, William Seaver, in 1821 - see William Seaver Murder Mystery, and Family History Compendium (posted 29 June 2011) for a list of all of the blog posts about this case.  Included is a post about Sarah's will in More Information on the Family of William Seaver (1783-1821) (posted 4 May 2011).  Apparently, Sarah's will was sustained by the Orphans' Court in 1901.

Who were all of the persons who contested the will?  I think they were Miss Seaver's cousins - probably nieces and nephews (and perhaps grand nieces and nephews) of Sarah's mother, who was born Martha Davis in Massachusetts. I easily found the first two of them in the Davis records.

It was fun reviewing the earlier blog posts and trying to figure out who the cousins.  I went down this rabbit hole again!


=============================================

The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2017/04/seavers-in-news-disputing-sarah-ac.html

Copyright (c) 2017, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.


Findmypast Offers Free Access to 1.9 Billion Essential Records for Five Days

I received this information from Findmypast:

==============================================

FINDMYPAST ENCOURAGE BUDDING GENEALOGISTS TO GET STARTED WITH FIVE DAYS OF FREE ACCESS TO OVER 1.8 BILLION ESSENTIAL RECORDS

From Thursday 27th April until 1st May 2017, over 1.9 billion birth marriage, death & and census records will be completely free to search and explore at Findmypast

This includes 595 million UK BMDs, the largest collection available online, over 80 million exclusive parish records you won’t find anywhere else, over 13 million Catholic Sacramental Registers covering England, Ireland, Scotland & the US, and over 168 million United States Marriages

London, UK, 27th April 2017

Findmypast is encouraging fledgling family historians to start their journey of discovery by providing five days of free access to their entire collection of birth, marriage, death and census records. From 09:00 BST, 27th April until 23:00 BST, May 1st 2017, all record matches on Findmypast Family trees and the 1.9 billion records they cover will be completely free to view and explore.

By providing free access to these essential beginner records, Findmypast aims to help budding genealogists start building their family tree and discover new ancestors through their records. Researchers will also be provided with daily getting started guides, expert insights and useful how-to blogs over the course of the free access period. A free webinar entitled “Start Your Family History Journey” will also be broadcast at 4pm BST, Friday April 28th.

For the next five days, all visitors to Findmypast will be able to access all of the following records for free:
  • Over 595 million UK birth, marriages & death records including exclusive parish collections
  • The Catholic Heritage Archive – a rich archive of over 13 million baptisms, marriages, burials & Sacramental registers from Ireland, Scotland, Westminster, Birmingham and Philadelphia – only available on Findmypast
  • Over 370 million US & Canadian vital records
  •  Over 9 million Irish census records including the 1901 & 1911 census – the only Irish censuses to survive intact
  • Over 27 million Australian & New Zealand BMDS
  • Over 257 million UK census records including all intact national censuses and a variety of early census fragments
  • Over 704 million US & Canadian Census records
  • Over 487,000 Australian & New Zealand Census records
All 1.9 billion records covered by the free access period are automatically matched against the names, dates and locations stored in Findmypast’s online Family Tree Builder. As information is added, Findmypast does all the hard work by sifting through the archives to instantly identify potential matches. Once potential matches have been made, users can quickly and easily review possible leads before adding the relevant information to their tree.

Keeping a tree on Findmypast is the first step towards exploring their archive of more than 8 billion records from around the world, more than 1 billion of which aren’t available anywhere else online.

=============================================

Disclosure:  I have a complimentary subscription for Findmypast.com, which does not affect my objectivity toward the company.

The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2017/04/findmypast-offers-free-access-to.html

Copyright (c) 2017, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.

1917 Connecticut Military Census Record for John Henry Richmond - Post #362 of Treasure Chest Thursday

It's Treasure Chest Thursday - time to look in my digital image files to see what treasures I can find for my family history and genealogy musings.

The treasure today is the  1917 Connecticut Military Census record for John Henry Richmond:


The extracted information from this record is (handwritten entries in italics):

Town or City:  Putnam                                            Date:  Feb. 24 [1917]    
Full Name:  John Henry Richmond                   
Post Office Address:  Putnam R.F.D. #3              
1.  What is your Present Trade, Occupation or Profession:    farmer     
2.  Have you experience in any other Trade, Occupation or Profession?  No     
3.  What is Your Age?    51       Height:  5' 7"      Weight:  150    
4.  Are You Married? Single? or Widower?   Married      
5.  How many persons are dependent on you for support?   Three      
6.  Are you a Citizen of the United States?    Yes     
7.  If not a citizen of the United States have you taken out your first papers?                              
8.  If not a citizen of the United States, what is your nationality?                                  
9.  Have you ever done any Military or Naval Service in this or any other Country?   No      
      Where?                                         How long?                    What Branch?                     Rank?           
10. Have you any serious physical disability?           If so, name it                           
11.  Can you do any of the following:  Ride a horse?   yes   Handle a team?   yes   Drive an automobile?  no   
Ride a motrocycle?  no  Understand telegraphy?  no  Operate a wireless?  no  Any experience with
a steam engine  no  Any experience with electrical machinery?  no  Handle a boat, power or sail?  no Any experience in simple coastwise navigation?  no  Any experience with High Speed Marine Gasoline
Engines?  no  Are you a good swimmer?  no  

The source citation for this record is:

"Connecticut, Military Census, 1917," indexed database with digital images, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 25 April 2017), Putnam > Ra-Ro, no. 510 (image 70 of 71), John Henry Richmond entry

My friend, John Finch, gave a presentation on World War I today and showed this database and the form with questions.  I found this page for my great-granduncle, John Henry Richmond (1865-1947) in the database.

If you have a male residing in Connecticut in 1917 and born in the 1850 to 1900 range, there may be a form for him.  


=============================================

The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2017/04/1917-connecticut-military-census-record.html

Copyright (c) 2017, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.

Wednesday, April 26, 2017

More on Find A Grave Memorials and My Family Tree

I wrote How Many Find A Grave Hints Do I Have on Ancestry? yesterday and had several pertinent questions in Comments which I will answer below:

1)  David B. Farstead asked:  "The Find A Grave memorial didn't have a photo of the headstone or a copy of the obituary. Are memorials like these any more reliable than unsourced Family Trees on Ancestry? Is it a good idea to add this information to your tree?"

My response:  At a minimum, a memorial without a photo of the gravestone or an obituary transcription can provide a clue for further research.

The memorial for Alice E. Emery Pickford had a birth date and a death date on it, but the source of those dates is not explicitly known.  There could be cemetery records that the Find A Grave memorial creator had access to and extracted information from, or perhaps the creator saw the gravestone, extracted information from it, and added it to the Find A Grave memorial.

Then there are the Suggested Records which appear on the Ancestry record summary page:


The first one is the U.S. Social Security Death Index record for Alice Pickford, which had the same birth date and death date as the Find A Grave memorial.  The other Suggested Records are all for City Directory entries, and are not too helpful.

The other clue from the Find A Grave memorial is Alice's maiden surname - Emery.  A search for Alice Emery, born in 1919, on Ancestry.com revealed U.S. census records in Leominster, Mass. for Alice Emery, daughter of Raymond and Margaret Emery, in the 1920, 1930 and 1940 enumerations.

In addition, I searched for an obituary on GenealogyBank, and found one for both Alice E. Pickford and J. Barry Pickford.  The obituary for Alice identified her as Mrs. Alice E. Emery Pickford age 89, and named her deceased husband, parents, son, granddaughter, brother and sister.

If this was one of my ancestral families, I would do more extensive searching in online resources and library or archive resources.  But Alice isn't in an ancestral family - she's a cousin's spouse who resided in the place my father grew up in.

I added all of the records above (except the City Directory records) to my profile for Alice E. Emery in RootsMagic and added a source citation for them to the events.  My hope is, of course, that a person searching for Alice on Ancestry.com would find her in my Ancestry Member Tree, learn something about her and her ancestry, and perhaps contact me to share more information (or thank me for leading them to Alice's information).

So, I think a Find A Grave memorial page with or without a gravestone image is a record that may provide enough clues to find actual records for a person.  In that way, it is similar to an undocumented online family tree.  It may be correct, or not; the record search needs to be performed in order to support the assertions.  I use online family trees in the same way - I look for clues and then find records to document the person profile.

2)  Justin York asked:  "Do you mine all hints that are correct? I ignore hints for people that I don't want to research. I typically limit myself to my ancestors and their descendants. It's pretty rare for me to research the family of a cousin's spouse. If you don't limit the scope of your research then your tree will explode in size as you mine hints and generate many more hints than the number you processed."

My response:  I try to mine all of the Hints in a database or for a person, especially for someone who may be a distant cousin, and a potential sharer of family DNA.

I do try to limit myself to Hints that are actual records (e.g., census records, military records, probate records, etc.) or record derivatives (e.g., a vital records index, a Find A Grave memorial, etc).

My RootsMagic family tree contains all of my known ancestral families, and many of their descendants. I also have ancestral families for my wife's ancestry, and the ancestry of my sons-in-law - which is all of the ancestry of my grandchildren.  Then there are one-name studies for Seaver, Carringer, Auble, Vaux, Dill, Buck, and McKnew surnames where I'm collecting records and trying to link those persons into my ancestral families.  For the descendants of my ancestors, I am trying to limit myself to descendants of my 5th great-grandparents or later, because they are the ones most likely to show up in an autosomal DNA match.  All of that is in my big RootsMagic database, some of it connected together in a really big tree and some in smaller bushes or twigs that are not connected to the big tree.

It used to take a long time (it took months in, say, 2005 and before!) to do all of the above for a person in my tree like Alice - a cousin's spouse.  These days, with database subscriptions, Hints, Suggested Records and search engines, the search took just minutes, but the data and source entry took a bit longer.

I do ignore Hints that are not for my person of interest, and for databases that I don't consider to be records, such as other online trees and compilations of records (e.g., the American Genealogical-Biographical Index, Millennium File, Family Data Collection, etc.)

As you surmised, my RootsMagic family tree database has exploded in size to over 47,600 persons over 29 years, and I have over 37,000 Record Hints waiting to be reviewed on Ancestry.com.

I doubt that I will ever finish the Family Tree task, but I will leave a fairly well documented online family tree for my descendants, and other researchers, to discover and work with.  A genealogist's work is never done!

3)  Thank you to David and Justin for their questions!!  

=============================================

The URL for this post is: http://www.geneamusings.com/2017/04/more-on-find-grave-memorials-and-my.html

Copyright (c) 2017, Randall J. Seaver

Please comment on this post on the website by clicking the URL above and then the "Comments" link at the bottom of each post.  Share it on Twitter, Facebook, Google+ or Pinterest using the icons below.  Or contact me by email at randy.seaver@gmail.com.